IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Initialized correctly but not yet used.
Will allow 'brl_flavour' to be removed from lock calls.
This will allow SMB2 POSIX handles to call with POSIX_LOCK
flavour instead of always using WINDOWS_LOCK (as now).
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Noel Power <npower@samba.org>
This allows the vfs backend to detect a retry and keep state between
the retries.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14113
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Forgot that one in the last patches
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Jun 20 23:39:34 UTC 2019 on sn-devel-184
Note: this changes the format of brlock.tdb!
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Wed Jun 6 23:22:00 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
Metze, you'll probably be happier with this work as it
doesn't abuse tevent in the way you dislike. This is a
first cut at the code, which will need lots of testing
but I'm hoping this will give people an idea of where I'm
going with this.
Jeremy.
This extends the file_id struct to add an additional generic uint64_t
field: extid. For backwards compatibility with dev/inodes stored in
xattr_tdbs and acl_tdbs, the ext id is ignored for these databases.
This patch should cause no functional change on systems that don't use
SMB_VFS_FILE_ID_CREATE to set the extid.
Existing code that uses the smb_share_mode library will need to be
updated to be compatibile with the new extid.
This patch adds 3 new VFS OPs for Windows byte range locking: BRL_LOCK_WINDOWS,
BRL_UNLOCK_WINDOWS and BRL_CANCEL_WINDOWS. Specifically:
* I renamed brl_lock_windows, brl_unlock_windows and brl_lock_cancel to
*_default as the default implementations of the VFS ops.
* The blocking_lock_record (BLR) is now passed into the brl_lock_windows and
brl_cancel_windows paths. The Onefs implementation uses it - future
implementations may find it useful too.
* Created brl_lock_cancel to do what brl_lock/brl_unlock do: set up a
lock_struct and call either the Posix or Windows lock function. These happen
to be the same for the default implementation.
* Added helper functions: increment_current_lock_count() and
decrement_current_lock_count().
* Minor spelling correction in brl_timeout_fn: brl -> blr.
* Changed blocking_lock_cancel() to return the BLR that it has cancelled. This
allows us to assert its the lock that we wanted to cancel. If this assert ever
fires, this path will need to take in the BLR to cancel, rather than choosing
on its own.
* Adds a small helper function: find_blocking_lock_record_by_id(). Used by the
OneFS implementation, but could be useful for others.
bugs in various places whilst doing this (places that assumed
BOOL == int). I also need to fix the Samba4 pidl generation
(next checkin).
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit f35a266b3c)
This replaces the internal explicit dev/ino file id representation by a
"struct file_id". This is necessary as cluster file systems and NFS
don't necessarily assign the same device number to the shared file
system. With this structure in place we can now easily add different
schemes to map a file to a unique 64-bit device node.
Jeremy, you might note that I did not change the external interface of
smb_share_modes.c.
Volker
(This used to be commit 9b10dbbd5d)
This changes "struct process_id" to "struct server_id", keeping both is
just too much hassle. No functional change (I hope ;-))
Volker
(This used to be commit 0ad4b1226c)
a POSIX lock (applying a read-lock) and we overlap
pending read locks then send them an unlock message,
we may have allowed them to proceed.
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit a7a0b6ba50)
test. Phew - that was painful :-). But what it means
is that we now implement lock cancels and I can add
lock cancels into POSIX lock handling which will fix
the fast/slow system call issue with cifsfs !
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit f1a9cf075b)
