IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
According to [MS-RPCE].pdf, section 2.2.2.11:
----
A client or a server that (during composing of a PDU) has allocated more space
for the authentication token than the security provider fills in SHOULD fill in
the rest of the allocated space with zero octets. These zero octets are still
considered to belong to the authentication token part of the PDU.<36>
----
RPC implementations are allowed to send padding bytes at the end of an auth
footer. Windows 7 makes use of this.
Thanks to Nick Meier <nmeier@microsoft.com>
Volker
The first is "kerberos method" and replaces the "use kerberos keytab"
with an enum. Valid options are:
secrets only - use only the secrets for ticket verification (default)
system keytab - use only the system keytab for ticket verification
dedicated keytab - use a dedicated keytab for ticket verification.
secrets and keytab - use the secrets.tdb first, then the system keytab
For existing installs:
"use kerberos keytab = yes" corresponds to secrets and keytab
"use kerberos keytab = no" corresponds to secrets only
The major difference between "system keytab" and "dedicated keytab" is
that the latter method relies on kerberos to find the correct keytab
entry instead of filtering based on expected principals.
The second parameter is "dedicated keytab file", which is the keytab
to use when in "dedicated keytab" mode. This keytab is only used in
ads_verify_ticket.
Not exactly an uninitialized variable, but having Coverity figure out that
we're only UNMARSHALLING here is probably asking for a bit too much.
(This used to be commit 07a9f7daa8)
This actually shows up in a valgrind massif run with 4.1% of allocated memory.
I don't see why we would have to make a copy here.
Metze?
(This used to be commit 616d6b97e5)
bugs in various places whilst doing this (places that assumed
BOOL == int). I also need to fix the Samba4 pidl generation
(next checkin).
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit f35a266b3c)
and PRIVACY, so no other cases to take care of so far...
Andrew B., if you have time, could you take a look? This makes us survive the
RPC-SAMBA3SESSIONKEY test.
Volker
(cherry picked from commit 25cc1e7ff1)
(This used to be commit b474600973)
This adds the two functions talloc_stackframe() and talloc_tos().
* When a new talloc stackframe is allocated with talloc_stackframe(), then
* the TALLOC_CTX returned with talloc_tos() is reset to that new
* frame. Whenever that stack frame is TALLOC_FREE()'ed, then the reverse
* happens: The previous talloc_tos() is restored.
*
* This API is designed to be robust in the sense that if someone forgets to
* TALLOC_FREE() a stackframe, then the next outer one correctly cleans up and
* resets the talloc_tos().
The original motivation for this patch was to get rid of the
sid_string_static & friends buffers. Explicitly passing talloc context
everywhere clutters code too much for my taste, so an implicit
talloc_tos() is introduced here. Many of these static buffers are
replaced by a single static pointer.
The intended use would thus be that low-level functions can rather
freely push stuff to talloc_tos, the upper layers clean up by freeing
the stackframe. The more of these stackframes are used and correctly
freed the more exact the memory cleanup happens.
This patch removes the main_loop_talloc_ctx, tmp_talloc_ctx and
lp_talloc_ctx (did I forget any?)
So, never do a
tmp_ctx = talloc_init("foo");
anymore, instead, use
tmp_ctx = talloc_stackframe()
:-)
Volker
(This used to be commit 6585ea2cb7)
Many things work (OpenHKLM, etc...) but some still don't.
This shouldn't block anyone so I'm checking it in.
Will probably move to a bzr tree after this for
longer dev cycles between checkins.
(This used to be commit cf1404a0d7)
