IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
leaving panic or more appropriate action to callers.
This can for instance happen in a clustered setup, when
ctdb is not running. This allows for a more defined behaviour,
reducing chicken-egg-problems.
Michael
(This used to be commit 3b6541ff48)
Jeremy, setting "exists" to True in _dfs_Add prevented the initial creation of
a new symlink for me, because the SMB_VFS_UNLINK failed. This also exists in
3.2. I only check it into 3.3 as I would like you to look at it first.
Thanks,
Volker
(This used to be commit f58b098a41)
At least form_junctions() does not initialize refcount, and I don't see it in
get_referred_path(). For the latters, the callers might initialize it. But even
if they did, I think parse_msdfs_symlink() should unconditionally return the
number of referrals it found. I don't think it makes sense to count them up
from somewhere else.
(This used to be commit 7317211348)
fsp_belongs_conn only used the vuid struct member anyway, and this is available
in the smb_request structure as well.
(This used to be commit 64e9372ab9)
Without this the changed checks in can_delete_file_in_directory give DELETE
access where there is none. So we can end up granting the ntcreate&x preparing
the unlink where we should not, which leads to a NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED at
close time later, which in turn does *not* give the access denied error message
in the Windows GUI.
can_delete_file_in_directory will grant access now by looking at the directory
permissions.
(This used to be commit 51b5364c2a)
With at least NFSv4 ACLs around the write permission for the owner is a bogus
check if we can delete a file in a directory. Like in Windows, there are two
ways which can grant us such: First, the DELETE permission on the file itself,
or if that does not help, the DELETE_CHILD permission on the directory. It
might be a bit more code that runs, but essentially we should end up with the
same set of syscalls in the non-acl case.
(This used to be commit daa9b05664)
Most already used it, these two still used SNUM(conn), where the only caller of
this routine (change_to_user) had set snum = SNUM(conn).
(This used to be commit b14e59bfdb)
Can someone with gpfs available test this ? The only codepath using this
function is the modules/gpfs.c module. The fix resolves at least the build
issues Samba has with recent kernel / libcap versions by using the portable
cap_get_proc()/cap_set_proc() interface (instead of using capget/capset).
Guenther
(This used to be commit 1779551412)
