IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
SMB1 unix extensions don't carry st_dev for stat
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14101
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Feb 26 00:50:32 UTC 2020 on sn-devel-184
This fixes doing strlen() on talloc_tos(), about which valgrind is pretty
unhappy. Without this patch we survive the tests because we have fallbacks to
the non-posix flavors of stat(). With this patch in place cli_posix_stat()
becomes functional in this code path. This creates conflicts with the readdir
libsmbclient tests, which need fixing separately.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14101
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
In case we would start to actually test kerberos auth via the libsmbclient API
(which we right now don't), this will change again. Until then,
make test TESTS=libsmbclient
is a lot faster this way.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
We don't need to plan those tests both in source3 and source4's
tests.py. The source4 version seems more "advanced", it uses
smbtorture4_testsuites() to list all tests, making it less
error-prone, and it also does the tests for all SMB1 and SMB3
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Makes an easier read of torture_libsmbclient_readdirplus_seek()
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Don't pass in the result buffer upon _send(), let the _recv() function
fill this in. Internal API only, adapt to current conventions.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This function already does the NULL check on the file pointer
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
It returned True/False, and is used as boolean only. Modernize
formatting a bit.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This had been missing in the initial async dosmode implementation. It's the
responsibility of the sync and async dosmode functions to call
vfswrap_is_offline() since the offline functionality has been converted from a
first class VFS function to be a part of the DOS attributes VFS functions.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14293
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Must use tevent_req_data() to get our tevent_req state, talloc_get_type_abort()
will just crash as struct tevent_req != struct vfswrap_getxattrat_state.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14293
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
vfswrap_is_offline() has been converted to a "helper" function some time ago, it
had been a VFS interface function before. To make this change more obvious let
it take a struct connection_struct instead of a struct vfs_handle_struct which
is the canonical first parameter to VFS functions.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14293
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
* Bug 14270:
Samba 4.11 and later give incorrect results for SCOPE_ONE searches
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Karolin Seeger <kseeger@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Feb 25 12:59:02 UTC 2020 on sn-devel-184
This changes the LDB behaviour in the combination of a SCOPE_ONE search and
an index returning less than 10 results.
After b6b5b5fe35 the list->strict flag
became set to false in all cases, rather than being left to the
value set by the caller.
This changes the ldb_kv_index_dn_one() code to force strict
mode on success instead.
Thanks to Marcus Granér, ICEYE Oy for reporting.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14270
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
The only difference is that the pull macros do the correct casting of
the integer in the end.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Feb 21 03:35:58 UTC 2020 on sn-devel-184
This is an implementation which doesn't have undefined behavior
problems. It casts correctly that calculations are don in the correct
integer space. Also the naming is less confusing than what we have in
byteorder.h.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
According to Posix and the Linux open(2) manpage, the open-syscall can
return EINTR. If that happens, core smbd saw this as an indication
that aio_pthread's open function was doing its job. With a real EINTR
without aio_pthread this meant we ended up in a server_exit after 20
seconds, because there was nobody to do the retry.
EINTR is mapped to NT_STATUS_RETRY. Handle this by just retrying after
a second.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14285
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Feb 20 22:14:25 UTC 2020 on sn-devel-184
Speed up the build a bit
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Autobuild-User(master): Martin Schwenke <martins@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Feb 19 11:28:56 UTC 2020 on sn-devel-184
This is fairly cheap and it is simple to do. This allows the Python
code to be able to specify a unclist quite simply. The level of
coupling doesn't seem worse than anything else in the
selftest/autobuild code.
There may be cleverer ways of doing this (e.g. a wrapper in
testprogs/blackbox/clusteredmember_smbtorture or similar) but cleverer
code isn't necessarily better code... and they'll probably involve
code duplication.
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
