IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Since memcmp_const_time() doesn't act as an exact replacement for
memcmp(), and its return value is only ever compared with zero, simplify
it and emphasize the intention of checking equality by returning a bool
instead.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Since data_blob_cmp_const_time() doesn't act as an exact replacement for
data_blob_cmp(), and its return value is only ever compared with zero,
simplify it and emphasize the intention of checking equality by
returning a bool instead.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This helps to avoid timing attacks.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15010
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14912
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Dec 2 14:49:35 UTC 2021 on sn-devel-184
This is a low level function that should not ignore results.
If the caller doesn't care it's his choice.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Oct 19 20:20:00 UTC 2021 on sn-devel-184
This will avoid getting rejected by the server if we generate
a weak challenge.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14497
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14195
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Nov 14 09:25:36 UTC 2019 on sn-devel-184
Fixes:
libcli/auth/netlogon_creds_cli.c:2622:2: warning: Value stored to 'status' is never read <--[clang]
status = netlogon_creds_decrypt_samlogon_validation(&state->tmp_creds,
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 warning generated.
Signed-off-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Aug 12 10:42:35 UTC 2019 on sn-devel-184
This widens the lock range to cover the check for established
credentials. Before this patch it could happen that more than one
winbind finds no credentials and does the auth3. This can pile up.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
netlogon_creds_cli_lck provides the locking around the operation
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Like netlogon_creds_cli_delete, protected by netlogon_creds_cli_lck
instead of netlogon_creds_cli_lock.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This adds an external locking scheme to protect our
netlogon_creds_CredentialState. This is needed because the routines
exposed by netlogon_creds_cli.h need a more flexible locking to
set up our credentials in a properly protected way.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This provides cleaner data dependencies. A netlogon_creds_ctx contains
everything required to open an schannel, there is no good reason to
require cli_credentials here.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
A netlogon_creds_cli_context holds all information required to do an
schannel bind. Used in the next commit.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
In a future commit we'll need a version that does not check for
context->db.locked_state
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
In a future commit we'll need a version that does not check for
context->db.locked_state
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
netlogon_creds_cli_get_internal almost does everything needed, only
the invalidating for credential chain use is missing.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Disentangle concerns, make netlogon_creds_cli_lock_fetch usable for
other callers
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
According to metze this was meant for test code that never materialized
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Don't implicitly TALLOC_FREE(creds) in the pure delete routine
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Don't implicitly TALLOC_FREE(creds) in the pure store routine. This
mixes up responsibilities, and there's not enough callers to justify
the TALLOC_FREE to be centralized.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
IMHO a full talloc_stackframe is overkill for the one allocation that is left
here.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
printf knows to only print part of a string. No need to talloc_strdup.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Same number of .text bytes, but simpler code.
Yes, this is {{0}} instead of {0}, which I always promote. I've just read a
comment on stackoverflow (which I've unfortunately just closed the tab for :-()
that {{0}} might actually be the correct way to init a struct to zero if the
first struct element is again a struct. I'm lost. 25 years of C coding and I
have no clue of the language :-(
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
