IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
We just create an dummy binding handle here
as it's not really dcerpc...
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
All gensec backends support GENSEC_FEATURE_SIGN_PKT_HEADER, so there's
no point in negotiating header signing based on the
auth context used during the DCERPC Bind.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
We only ever create domain->lsa_pipe_tcp with
cli_rpc_pipe_open_schannel_with_creds() and hardcoded NCACN_IP_TCP.
And schannel_update_internal returns an error with
an auth level lower than DCERPC_AUTH_LEVEL_INTEGRITY.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
It's not per auth_context_id, currently there's no difference
but that will change in future...
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Note we only need to call this once per connection, not after
each request...
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Note we only need to call this once per connection, not after
each request...
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
We already used DCERPC_AUTH_LEVEL_PRIVACY for the connection.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Now that we check for NT_STATUS_RPC_UNSUPPORTED_TYPE, there's no
need to check for DCERPC_NCA_S_UNSUPPORTED_TYPE.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
We should build with lmdb support also if it is not in AD case. The lmdb
backend is also used e.g. by sssd.
If you don't want to build it, you can always specify --without-ldb-lmdb
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15721
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Sep 25 05:36:13 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
When turn-on 'log level = 3', sending SIGHUP to samba processes, for
example: smbd parent/children, smbd-notifyd, and smbd-cleanupd. Then
monitor log.smbd in order to parse sighup logs, it looks like the log level
is inconsistent among these processes: smbd parent/children use level 1,
and smbd-notifyd/smbd-cleanupd use level 3.
This patch raises sighup handler's log level from level 1 to level 3, which
is more consistent with smbd-notifyd by Commit 6e5bff80a0 ("s3:notifyd:
Handle sigup in notifyd to reparse smb.conf"), and smbd-cleanupd by Commit
57c1e115ec ("smbd: reopen logs on SIGHUP for notifyd and cleanupd").
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15706
Signed-off-by: Jones Syue <jonessyue@qnap.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Autobuild-User(master): Martin Schwenke <martins@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Sep 25 01:38:02 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
GPOs containing GPWL (Wireless/Wired Protocol Extension) policies could not be deleted with samba-tool
as those policies were stored as subentries of the GPO and only the main root was deleted.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15387
RN: Fix for inability to delete GPOs containing GPWL policies using samba-tool
Signed-off-by: Kacper Boström <kacper@kacper.se>
Reviewed-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Sep 24 17:11:53 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
