IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Signed-off-by: Isaac Boukris <iboukris@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Jan 25 21:57:57 CET 2019 on sn-devel-144
Should make us more robust when dealing with slow DNS servers.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Jan 22 23:37:16 CET 2019 on sn-devel-144
nt_errstr_const was renamed nt_errstr in 2011, rendering the
declaration useless.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Gesang <philipp.gesang@intra2net.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This will be linked into the SAMBA_LIBRARY "addns" in the next step. Because
the other user, "dnsserver_common", is also a library, we can't link this as a
subsystem anymore.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Make this a separate commit: That is the feature that libc unfortunately does
not give us.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Wrapper function to parse resolv.conf and talk to multiple nameservers. This is
the code where we might want to add a "working nameserver" cache. glibc always
looks at the first configured nameserver. If that's dead, glibc runs into a
timeout and only then asks the second one that might succeed. When more than
one dns query is to be performed, these timeouts add up.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Right now this only looks at the nameserver setting. It is initally made for
asynchronous AD DC lookup routines, where we don't need the "search", "domain"
and other settings. When we convert general "net", "smbclient" and others to
use this, we might either add "domain" handling to this code or look at
something like c-ares which already does it.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Although it's unusual to hit this case, I was seeing it happen while
working on the SMB python bindings. Even with debug level 10, there was
nothing coming out to help pin down the source of the
NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13736
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
ZERO_STRUCT is not wrong here, it will give the same result, but better
use macros with correct naming as it makes clear what happens when you
read the code.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Dec 12 22:18:52 CET 2018 on sn-devel-144
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12164
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Mulder <dmulder@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
The original commit c5cd22b5bb from bug
9175 never worked, as the preceeding signing check overwrote the status
variable.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9175
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Nov 13 17:28:45 CET 2018 on sn-devel-144
This can be used by the upper layers to force checking a response is
signed. It will be used to implement verification of session setup
reauth responses in a torture test. That comes next.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13661
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
This allows adding an additional condition to the if check where the
condition state may be modified in the "if (opcode ==
SMB2_OP_SESSSETUP)" case directly above.
No change in behaviour.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13661
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Nov 3 00:23:31 CET 2018 on sn-devel-144
This is modeled after server_id_str_buf, which as an API to me is easier to
use: I can rely on the compiler to get the buffer size right.
It is designed to violate README.Coding's "Make use of helper variables", but
as this API is simple enough and the output should never be a surprise at all,
I think that's worth it.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Nov 2 20:11:11 CET 2018 on sn-devel-144
Currently if the client and server can't negotiate an SMB protocol, you
just get the followiing error on the client-side, which doesn't tell you
much.
ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (3221225667, 'The network responded
incorrectly.')
This patch adds a debug message to help highlight what's actually going
wrong.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13621
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Sep 28 11:25:29 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
Fixes an error detected by buildroot autobuilders:
http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/573/573e2268e205e10d1352fa81122d8f225fdb4575/build-end.log
/home/rclinux/rc-buildroot-test/scripts/instance-1/output/host/mips64el-buildroot-linux-uclibc/sysroot/usr/include/stdint.h:122:27:
error: conflicting types for 'uintptr_t'
typedef unsigned long int uintptr_t;
^
In file included from ../lib/ldb/tests/ldb_msg.c:17:0:
../third_party/cmocka/cmocka.h:126:28: note: previous declaration of 'uintptr_t' was here
typedef unsigned int uintptr_t;
The define __WORDSIZE is missing when cmocka.h decides how to
define uintptr_t, this patch includes stdint.h when needed.
Patch sent upstream:
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2018-January/125306.html
Signed-off-by: Bernd Kuhls <bernd.kuhls@t-online.de>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Aug 24 17:22:10 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
An 'Object Access Allowed' ACE that assigned 'Control Access' (CR)
rights to a specific attribute would not actually grant access.
What was happening was the remaining_access mask for the object_tree
nodes would be Read Property (RP) + Control Access (CR). The ACE mapped
to the schemaIDGUID for a given attribute, which would end up being a
child node in the tree. So the CR bit was cleared for a child node, but
not the rest of the tree. We would then check the user had the RP access
right, which it did. However, the RP right was cleared for another node
in the tree, which still had the CR bit set in its remaining_access
bitmap, so Samba would not grant access.
Generally, the remaining_access only ever has one bit set, which means
this isn't a problem normally. However, in the Control Access case there
are 2 separate bits being checked, i.e. RP + CR.
One option to fix this problem would be to clear the remaining_access
for the tree instead of just the node. However, the Windows spec is
actually pretty clear on this: if the ACE has a CR right present, then
you can stop any further access checks.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13434
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Reading the spec and then reading the code makes sense, but we could
comment the code more so it makes sense on its own.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13434
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Object-specific access checks refer to a specific section of the
MS-ADTS, and the code closely matches the spec. We need to extend this
logic to properly handle the Control-Access Right (CR), so it makes
sense to split the logic out into its own function.
This patch just moves the code, and should not alter the logic (apart
from ading in the boolean grant_access return variable.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13434
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
This fixes a regression that came in via 00db3aba6c.
Found by Vivek Das <vdas@redhat.com> (Red Hat QE).
In order to demonstrate simply run:
smbclient //server/share -U user%password -mNT1 -c quit \
--option="client ntlmv2 auth"=no \
--option="client use spnego"=no
against a server that uses "ntlm auth = ntlmv2-only" (our default
setting).
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13360
CVE-2018-1139: Weak authentication protocol allowed.
Guenther
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13360
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
result_independent_of_operands: "(uint16_t)(recursive ? 1 : 0) >> 8" is
0 regardless of the values of its operands. This occurs as the operand
of assignment.
Found by Coverity.
Pair-Programmed-With: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Commit e2c9ad93cb removed the last caller
of this.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed May 9 19:18:44 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
