IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
DRSUAPI_COMPRESSION_TYPE_XPRESS is not MS-XCA nor is it implemented by
lzexpress_compress(), so disconnect from that algorithm.
This avoids someone fixing lzxpress_compress() to work for DRSUAPI
and breaking claims support.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This helps explain these better than WERR_GEN_FAILURE.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15189
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Nov 27 10:07:18 UTC 2020 on sn-devel-184
lib/util/safe_string.h is similar to source3/include/safe_string.h, but
the former has fewer checks. It is missing bcopy, strcasecmp, and
strncasecmp.
Add the missing elements to lib/util/safe_string.h remove the other
safe_string.h which is in the source3-specific path. To accomodate
existing uses of str(n?)casecmp, add #undef lines to source files where
they are used.
Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Aug 28 02:18:40 UTC 2020 on sn-devel-184
Otherwise we may not be able to construct a working schema that's
required to apply the changes.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12204
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Add a post fork hook to the service API this will be called:
- standard process model
immediately after the task_init.
- single process model
immediately after the task_init
- prefork process model, inhibit_pre_fork = true
immediately after the task_init
- prefork process model, inhibit_pre_fork = false
after each service worker has forked. It is not run on the service
master process.
The post fork hook is not called in the standard model if a new process
is forked on a new connection. It is instead called immediately after
the task_init.
The task_init hook has been changed to return an error code. This ensures
the post_fork code is only run if the task_init code completed successfully.
Signed-off-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
This is probably a note-worthy event for debugging purposes.
(Found while developing the domain rename functionality)
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed May 30 07:03:51 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
This rare error case forgot to call ldb_transaction_cancel()
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
In schema_load_init, we find that the writing of indices is not locked
in any way. This leads to race conditions. To resolve this, we need to
have a new state (SCHEMA_COMPARE) which can report to the caller that we
need to open a transaction to write the indices.
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Refactor the process model code to allow the addition of a prefork
process model.
- Add a process context to contain process model specific state
- Add a service details structure to allow service to indicate which
process model options they can support.
In the new code the services advertise the features they support to the
process model. The process model context is plumbed through to allow the
process model to keep track of the supported options, and any state
the process model may require.
Signed-off-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
This is used in the client and in the server
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
We are going to end up supporting 2 different server schemes:
A. the old/default behaviour of sending all the linked attributes last,
at the end of the replication cycle.
B. the new/Microsoft way of sending the linked attributes interleaved
with the source/target objects.
Normally if we're talking to a server using the old scheme-A, we won't
ever use the GET_TGT flag. However, there are a couple of cases where
it can happen:
- A link to a new object was added during the replication cycle.
- An object was deleted while the replication was in progress (and
the linked attribute got queued before the object was deleted).
Talking to an Samba DC running the old scheme will just cause it to
start the replication cycle from scratch again, which is fairly
harmless. However, there is a chance that the same thing can happen
again, in which case the replication cycle will fail (because GET_TGT
was already set).
Even if we're using the new scheme (B), we could still potentially hit
this case, as we can still queue up linked attributes between requests
(group memberships can be larger than what can fit into a single
replication chunk).
If GET_TGT is set in the GetNcChanges request, then the local copy of
the target object should always be up-to-date when we process the linked
attribute. So if we still think the target object is deleted/recycled at
this point, then it's safe to ignore the linked attribute (because we
know our local copy is up-to-date). This logic matches the MS spec logic
in ProcessLinkValue().
Not failing the replication cycle may be beneficial if we're trying to
do a full-sync of a large database. Otherwise it might be time-consuming
and frustrating to repeat the sync unnecessarily.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12972
- Update IDL comments to include Microsoft reference doc
- Add support for sending v10 GetNCChanges request (needed for the
GET_TGT flag, which is in the new 'more_flags' field)
- Update to also set the GET_TGT flag in the same place we were setting
GET_ANC (I split this logic out into a separate function).
- The state struct now needs to hold a 'more_flags' field as well (this
flag is different to the GET_ANC replica flag)
Note that using the GET_TGT when replicating from a Windows DC could be
highly inefficient. Because Samba keeps the GET_TGT flag set throughout
the replication cycle, it will basically receive a repeated object from
Windows for every single linked attribute that it receives.
I believe Windows behaviour only expects the client to set the GET_TGT
flag when it actually needs to (i.e. when it receives a target object it
doesn't know about), rather than throughout the replication cycle.
However, this approach won't work with Samba-to-Samba replication,
because when the server receives the GET_TGT flag it restarts the
replication cycle from scratch. So if we only set the GET_TGT flag when
the client encountered an unknown target then Samba-to-Samba could
potentially get into an endless replication loop.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12972
Currently we only check that the target object is known at the end of
the transaction (i.e. the .prepare_commit hook). It's too late at this
point to resend the request with GET_TGT. Move this processing earlier
on, after we've applied all the objects (i.e. off the .extended hook).
In reality, we need to perform the checks at both points. I've
split the common code that gets the source/target details out of the
la_entry into a helper function. It's not the greatest function ever,
but seemed to make more sense than duplicating the code.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12972
If the DRS client received a linked attribute that it couldn't resolve
the target for, then it would just ignore that link and keep going. That
link would then be lost forever (although a full-sync would resolve
this). Instead of silently ignoring the link, fail the transaction.
This *can* happen on Samba, but it is unusual. The target object and
linked-attribute would need to be added while a replication is still in
progress. It can also happen fairly easily when talking to a Windows DC.
There are two import exceptions to this:
1). Linked attributes that span partitions. We can never guarantee that
we will have received the target object, because it may be in a partition
we haven't replicated yet. Samba doesn't have a great way of handling
this currently, but we shouldn't fail the replication (because that breaks
basic join tests). Just skip that linked attribute and hope that a
subsequent full-sync will fix it.
(I queried Microsoft and they said resolving cross-partition linked
attributes is a implementation-specific problem to solve. GET_TGT won't
resolve it)
2). When the replication involves a subset of objects, e.g.
critical-only. In these cases, we don't increase the highwater-mark, so
it is probably not such a dire problem if we don't add the link. In the
case of critical-only, we will do a subsequent full sync which will then
add the links.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12972
This TODO was added in 2007 before we supported linked attributes.
It's no longer relevant.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
If we do not block these, we can get RPC faults
(DCERPC_NCA_S_PROTO_ERROR) which gives WERR_WRITE_FAULT back to the
DsReplicaSync call as there are two outstanding requests on the wire
at the one time.
We will get to the next operation as soon as this is finished
when we call run_pending_ops().
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12926
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Jul 23 12:32:49 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
When we are sent a DsReplicaSync() we should work on inbound replication
(ideally from the requested source, but so far we just start the whole queue)
right away, not after 1 second.
We should also target inbound replication, not any outbound replication
notification that may happen to be due.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12921
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Jul 22 07:45:31 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
Although we do not currently support this in the server, this will cause
data loss against a Windows DC unless we set this flag as per the docs.
This flag is required for the RODC.
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Garming Sam <garming@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Jun 15 05:31:59 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
Use the passed in context from callers. Remove one
talloc_autofree_context().
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Not currently used - no logic changes inside.
This will make it possible to pass down a long-lived talloc
context from the loading function for modules to use instead
of having them internally all use talloc_autofree_context()
which is a hidden global.
Updated all known module interface numbers, and added a
WHATSNEW.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Apr 22 01:17:00 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
Against Windows, the call will always fail without it.
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
In the case it is not in the replication group, it it correct to deny
the replication to succeed.
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Lamb <chris@chris-lamb.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Lamb <chris@chris-lamb.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Most of the time it is spamming the logs, so increase the level to debug
for most messages.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Sep 2 05:06:00 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
We already do that for objects in dsdb_convert_object_ex().
We need to be consistent and do the same for linked attributes.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12128
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
