IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Works against Windows 2025 preview:
SMB_CONF_PATH=/dev/null \
SERVER=172.31.9.115 DC_SERVER=w2025p-115.w2025p-l8.base \
DOMAIN="W2025P-L8" REALM="W2025P-L8.BASE" \
ADMIN_USERNAME="Administrator" ADMIN_PASSWORD="A1b2C3d4" \
NETLOGON_STRONG_KEY_SUPPORT=1 NETLOGON_AUTH_KRB5_SUPPORT=1 \
STRICT_CHECKING=0 python/samba/tests/krb5/netlogon.py
The code still works against Windows 2022 with the
following options:
SMB_CONF_PATH=/dev/null \
SERVER=172.31.9.118 DC_SERVER=w2022-118.w2022-l7.base \
DOMAIN="W2022-L7" REALM="W2022-L7.BASE" \
ADMIN_USERNAME="Administrator" ADMIN_PASSWORD="A1b2C3d4" \
NETLOGON_STRONG_KEY_SUPPORT=1 NETLOGON_AUTH_KRB5_SUPPORT=0 \
STRICT_CHECKING=0 python/samba/tests/krb5/netlogon.py
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
This is how Windows 2022 (and 2025 preview) behaves...
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14356
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
This is the error Windows 2022 (and 2025 preview) return.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14356
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
We only want to test against
'allow dcerpc auth level connect:lsarpc = yes' once
in order to have the related code tests.
We use the ad_memeber for that special test and
use the default on the tested ADDC.
This reveals some knownfails, which will be fixed in
the next commit...
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14356
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Test works against Windows 2022 and works like this:
SMB_CONF_PATH=/dev/null SERVER=172.31.9.118 \
TARGET_HOSTNAME=w2022-118.w2022-l7.base IGNORE_RANDOM_PAD=1 \
DOMAIN=W2022-L7 REALM=W2022-L7.BASE \
USERNAME=administrator PASSWORD=A1b2C3d4 \
python/samba/tests/dcerpc/raw_protocol.py -v -f TestDCERPC_BIND
Against a legacy Windows2012R2 server this still works:
SMB_CONF_PATH=/dev/null SERVER=172.31.9.188 \
TARGET_HOSTNAME=w2012r2-188.w2012r2-l6.base ALLOW_BIND_AUTH_PAD=1 \
LEGACY_BIND_NACK_NO_REASON=1 AUTH_LEVEL_CONNECT_LSA=1 \
IGNORE_RANDOM_PAD=1 DOMAIN=W2012R2-L6 REALM=W2012R2-L6.BASE \
USERNAME=administrator PASSWORD=A1b2C3d4 \
python/samba/tests/dcerpc/raw_protocol.py -v -f TestDCERPC_BIND
Currently Samba behaves like 2012R2, but the next commits
will change that...
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14356
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
This shows that they are ignored for machine accounts as domain member.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
On master attempting to chdir into a nested dfs link
e.g. cd dfslink (works)
cd dfslink/another_dfslink (fails)
[1] Add a test for this scenario (nested chdir)
[2] Add test for enumerating a dfs link in root of dfs share
[3] Add a test to check case insensitive chdir into dfs link on widelink
enabled share
Add knownfails for tests 1 and 3
Signed-off-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15435
Once we have a gMSA server side the impact of deleting root keys becomes real
and so we must do this in a quiet place where it can not impact on other things.
Likewise, we want the samba.tests.dsdb_quiet_provision_tests tests to run
somewhere that is not doing other things, so we can see what a bare provision
will do. We must not allow test ordering inside the file to cause tests that
create root keys to run before checking if provision created a usable root key.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
This helps make use-after-free testing reliable.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Mar 20 04:53:57 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This is the last test left in the independent ldb testsuite,
removing this from there allows the test target to be removed.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Mar 1 01:27:30 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
This tests the witness service and its interaction with
ctdb.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Dec 21 21:19:30 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Dec 8 03:25:20 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
We would like confidence that the FAST hooks work with both implementations.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Douglas Bagnall <dbagnall@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Nov 23 00:32:33 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This is a test using conditional ACEs and claims to confirm that we understand
the full end-to-end network behaviour of these all the way from the PAC to the
application in the access check of the KDC.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Pair-programmed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Sep 28 04:35:05 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
Can Samba understand Windows security descriptors? Does it parse SDDL
the same way?
Here we test on over 7000 SDDL/descriptor pairs and find the answer
is pleasing. In later commits we will add more tests using different
classes of ACE.
The test cases are derived from fuzz seeds, exported to Windows via
the script in the last commit, with the Windows descriptor bytes found
using libcli/security/tests/windows/windows-sddl-test.py.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This is the version we test with in CI after the image update
in the next commit. This addresses the issues that were
fixed in CVE-2022-37967 (KrbtgtFullPacSignature) and ensures
that Samba builds against the MIT version that allows us to
avoid that attack.
The hooks to allow these expectations to be disabled in the tests
are kept for now, to allow this to be reverted or to test
older servers.
With MIT 1.21 as the new test standard for the MIT KDC build
we update the knownfail_mit_kdc - this was required regadless
after the CI image update.
Any update to the CI image, even an unrelated one, brings in
a new MIT Krb5, version 1.21-3 in this case. This has new
behaviour that needs to be noted in the knownfail files or
else the tests, which haven't changed, will fail and
pipelines won't pass.
(The image generated by the earlier bootstrap commit brought
in krb5-1.21-2 which was buggy with CVE-2023-39975)
Further tweaks to tests or the server should reduce the number
of knownfail entries, but this keeps the pipelines passing for now.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15231
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
This tests the reload (and if needed regeneration) of
tls certificates.
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jule Anger <janger@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
To run these tests standalone, you will need the certificate and private
key of the Certificate Authority. These can be specified together in the
same file with the environment variable CA_CERT, or the private key may
be specified in its own file with CA_PRIVATE_KEY.
If either of these files are encrypted, you can specify the password in
the environment variable CA_PASS.
These tests create a new certificate for the user account, signed with
the private key of the Certificate Authority. We negotiate the reply key
with either of the public-key and Diffie-Hellman PK-INIT variants, and
use the reply key to decrypt the enc-part in the response. We also check
that the KDC’s signatures are valid.
Most of the failures with the Heimdal KDC are due to the wrong nonce
being returned in the reply compared to Windows, which issue is simple
enough to correct.
An example command line for manual testing against Windows:
SMB_CONF_PATH=ad_dc.conf KRB5_CONFIG=krb5.conf SERVICE_USERNAME=win2k19-dc.example.com ADMIN_USERNAME=Administrator ADMIN_PASSWORD=locDCpass ADMIN_KVNO=1 FOR_USER=Administrator USERNAME=Administrator PASSWORD=locDCpass DC_SERVER=win2k19-dc.example.com SERVER=win2k19-dc.example.com DOMAIN=example REALM=example.com PYTHONPATH=bin/python STRICT_CHECKING=1 FAST_SUPPORT=1 CLAIMS_SUPPORT=1 COMPOUND_ID_SUPPORT=1 TKT_SIG_SUPPORT=1 FULL_SIG_SUPPORT=1 GNUTLS_PBKDF2_SUPPORT=1 EXPECT_PAC=1 EXPECT_EXTRA_PAC_BUFFERS=1 CHECK_CNAME=1 CHECK_PADATA=1 KADMIN_IS_TGS=0 FORCED_RC4=1 DEFAULT_ETYPES=36 CA_CERT=./win2k19-ca.pfx CA_PASS=1234 python3 python/samba/tests/krb5/pkinit_tests.py
To set up windows for this I first installed an Certificate Authority with an Enterprise CA.
Then I exported the private key and certificate of the CA:
1. go into the Certification Authority snap-in for the relevant computer,
2. right-clicking the CA
3. clicking ‘All Tasks’ → ‘Back up CA...’
4. and exporting the private key and CA certificate.
(I downloaded the resulting file via smbclient).
After setting up an Enterprise CA, I also needed to edit the domain
controller GPO to enable auto-enrollment, otherwise Windows would
refuse to accept as legitimate any certificates provided by the client.
That can be done by first enabling the policy:
‘Computer Configuration/Policies/Windows Settings/Security Settings/Public Key Policies/Certificate Services Client — Auto-Enrollment’,
and then ticking both ‘Renew expired certificates…’ and ‘Update certificates…’)
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This removes a lot of inline #ifdef and means this feature is always tested.
We can do this as we have chosen GnuTLS 3.6.13 as the new minimum version.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
For each test, we check the authentication logs and ensure the messages
are as we expect.
We only test AS-REQs and TGS-REQs with the Heimdal KDC at the moment,
assuming that MIT doesn’t support logging for those cases.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Add tests for model fields to ensure they behave as expected when
calling from_db_value and to_db_value methods.
Add a base class for the tests themselves via a mixin as unittest
doesn't support abstract test case classes.
For each field, from_db_value and to_db_value must either be a list or
a property that returns a list.
The list contains input values and expected values, the expected value
can also be a callback for more complex comparison, this is used for
the possible claim values xml.
It is important that singular values and list values are tested, and
also None to ensure that fields properly get unset when a model is
saved.
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
The domain_auth tests are also prefixed with domain, it matches the
cli command "samba-tool domain claim".
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
