IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
"find_element" returns an "int" since there is also the possibility that a
certain element doesn't exist - then "-1" is returned. But beside this
exception treat all other return values as unsigned.
this function takes the operator being invoked, which will allow
schema functions to provide more fine grained control over
comparisons.
The key bug this was introduced to fix is the incorrect handling of
the LDB_OP_PRESENT test for deleted linked attributes. The backends
are unaware of the deleted state of these links, so they cannot do a
LDB_OP_PRESENT test on their own.
Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
the problem was the inconsistency between the key form of DNs between
the itdb used for indexing and the on disk form
Thanks to Matthieu Patou for finding this bug!
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
It seems to me more consistent (and also to keep the same behaviour on all
backends).
Also the DRS hack should therefore not be needed anymore since the
"repl_meta_data" module launches requests behind "objectclass_attrs".
When using w2k3 linked attributes we are allowed to have multiple
values on a single valued attribute. This happens when the other
values are deleted.
Setting the RELAX control tell the ldb-tdb backend to not check for
this on replace, which means the caller has to check for single valued
violations.
It isn't very useful just saying that a control is not supported,
without saying which one is the problem
Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
- The outside API contains "DN" string arguments: Bad. Since in this way we
fully rely on the outside calls regarding the right DN format. Solution: Use
always a "struct ldb_dn" entry. Since this one is interchangeable and we can
handle it in our preferred way.
- DN comparison: The function doesn't seem that efficient. I "upgraded" it a bit
to be more powerful (added a second length check and do both before the string
comparison)
When we rename or modify a record, we need to update the indexes at
the same time. It is important that we use the DN of the actual
message that is stored in the database to do this, not the DN that was
passed in by the user. If the two differ in case then the index
records needs to use the 'real' record DN, as index handling is
currently case sensitive.
The ldb_dn_explode code normally enforces all special characters,
including a '=', must be escaped. Unfortunately this conflicts with
the ltdb index DNs, which for binary attributes may be base64
encoded. This allows a unescaped '=' as a special case for index DNs.
I think this is better since "ldb_backend_connect" and "ldb_connect" which
propagate those values should return only LDB constants. Therefore a conversion
(especially for "-1") would be needed.
