IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Nov 23 01:25:12 UTC 2019 on sn-devel-184
Now we have one fixed field for the exclusive lock holder and an array
of shared locks. This way we now prioritize writers over readers: If a
pending write comes in while readers are active, it will put itself
into the exclusive slot. Then it waits for the readers to vanish. Only
when all readers are gone the exclusive lock request is granted. New
readers will just look at the exclusive slot and see it's taken. They
will then line up as watchers, retrying whenever things change.
This also means that it will be cheaper to support many shared locks:
Granting a shared lock just means to extend the array. We don't have
to walk the array for possible conflicts.
This also adds explicit UPGRADE and DOWNGRADE operations for better
error checking.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
In the future, g_lock will not check for duplicate READ locks anymore,
as there might be many of them and the check might be expensive
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Soon the g_lock database format will change. There will be one
exclusive entry and an array of shared entries. In that format,
there's no need to attach a lock_type to each entry in the g_lock
database. Reflect this change in the g_lock_dump API
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
I want to reduce dbwrap_record_get_value(). It makes the caller believe it can
make a copy of the TDB_DATA returned and that the value remains constant. It's
not, as you can always do a dbwrap_record_store().
This patch removes one requirement for getting the value out of a
db_record via dbwrap_record_get_value(). You can still make a copy, but from an
API perspective to me it's more obvious that "value" as a parameter to the
callback has a limited lifetime.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Piggyback on existing tests, ensure we don't regress on:
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14161
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
[MS-FSA] 2.1.5.1 Server Requests an Open of a File.
Checks how to behave on both files and directories.
Tested against Windows 10 server - passes. Currently smbd fails this.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
This goes directly into the database, for which the format changes
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This does a vfs_ChDir() to the share root (not changing the
directory) which correctly sets up the conn->cwd_fsp member
so any XXXAT() calls correctly work inside vfstest.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
LOCK9A is the original test (with a timeout of -1)
and LOCK9B is the same but with timeout of 10 seconds.
LOCK9B is needed to demonstrate a server bug in the next
commits.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14113
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
smbXcli_conn_disconnect(alarm_cli->conn, NT_STATUS_OK)
means existing requests are not finished with an error,
but instead just keep dangling arround.
Pass NT_STATUS_LOCAL_DISCONNECT in order to fail the
cli_lock32() call after getting SIGALARM.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14113
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Use conn->cwd_fsp as current src and dst fsp's.
No logic change for now.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Use conn->cwd_fsp as current src and dst fsp's.
No logic change for now.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Survives against W2k12R2
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Aug 8 01:05:38 UTC 2019 on sn-devel-184
Tests commit 9f6b87d3f6
To run: make test TESTS="samba3.smbtorture_s3.plain.TLDAP"
Reverting the above commit makes this test fail:
'GUID format in control (no hyphens) doesn't match output
tldap_search with extended dn (no val) failed: LDAP error 0 (TLDAP_SUCCESS),
TEST TLDAP FAILED!'
This behaviour couldn't be tested via LDB libraries because they never
deal with the underlying DN string.
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14029
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Aug 1 06:20:28 UTC 2019 on sn-devel-184
The test never worked correctly because the code was overlooked. It was
also the case that the connection was never authenticated, and so an
LDAP BIND call has now been added.
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14029
Show that the current smb1 server does not properly retry a nonblocking
open of a kernel-oplocked file
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14060
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Jun 26 19:31:28 UTC 2019 on sn-devel-184
(Spoiler alert, it breaks the oplock :-).
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Jun 24 20:05:34 UTC 2019 on sn-devel-184
Change test to check two things:
1) Open a symlink for SD read or write access should fail.
2) Request attribute open. Getsd/Setsd on this handle should
fail.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Samba aborts the read&x after a blocked, but eventually successful
locking&x call. Both Windows and source4/ntvfs do the read properly,
source3/smbd does not. With later code, this will become possible much
easier. Lets see if it's worth it given that we've got away with this
forever.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Right now we fail this with smbd, we return LOCK_NOT_GRANTED instead
of FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT. This will change with later commits.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Torture tests should return true on success and false on failure.
Returning -1 is the same as returning true and returning 0 is the same
as returning false. Change the return values to true and false to fix
the return values.
Detected by the help of cppcheck.
Signed-off-by: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun May 19 18:48:01 UTC 2019 on sn-devel-184
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13865
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Apr 6 06:08:42 UTC 2019 on sn-devel-144
This is a deviation from the Posix readlink function that from my
point of view makes this function easier to use. In Posix, probably
the assumption is that readlink is cheap, so someone under memory
constraints could just start with a small buffer and incrementally
increase the buffer size. For us, it's a network round-trip, and we
have the luxury of [mt]alloc, which the syscall kernel interface does
not have.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Mar 27 12:31:37 UTC 2019 on sn-devel-144
s/vald/valid/
Signed-off-by: Michael Hanselmann <public@hansmi.ch>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
