IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This is not performance critical, and this removes source3 specific
code
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Jun 17 09:27:07 CEST 2014 on sn-devel-104
This also changes the layering
messaging_send_iov -> messaging_send_buf -> messaging_send
to
messaging_send_buf -> messaging_send -> messaging_send_iov
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
With this patch it will be possible to use nested event contexts with
messaging_filtered_read_send/recv. Before this patchset only the one and only
event context a messaging_context is initialized with is able to receive
datagrams from the unix domain socket. So if you want to code a synchronous
RPC-like operation using a nested event context, you will not see the reply,
because the nested event context does not have the required tevent_fd's.
Unfortunately, this patchset has to add some advanced array voodoo. The idea
is that state->watches[] contains what we hand out with watch_new, and
state->contexts contains references to the tevent_contexts. For every watch we
need a tevent_fd in every event context, and the routines make sure that the
arrays are properly maintained.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Messaging based on unix domain datagram sockets
This makes every process participating in messaging bind on a unix domain
datagram socket, similar to the source4 based messaging. The details are a bit
different though:
Retry after EWOULDBLOCK is done with a blocking thread, not by polling. This
was the only way I could in experiments avoid a thundering herd or high load
under Linux in extreme overload situations like many thousands of processes
sending to one blocked process. If there are better ideas to do this in a
simple way, I'm more than happy to remove the pthreadpool dependency again.
There is only one socket per process, not per task. I don't think that per-task
sockets are really necessary, we can do filtering in user space. The message
contains the destination server_id, which contains the destination task_id. I
think we can rebase the source4 based imessaging on top of this, allowing
multiple imessaging contexts on top of one messaging_context. I had planned to
do this conversion before this goes in, but Jeremy convinced me that this has
value in itself :-)
Per socket we also create a fcntl-based lockfile to allow race-free cleanup of
orphaned sockets. This lockfile contains the unique_id, which in the future
will make the server_id.tdb obsolete.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
