IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Failed DNS updates just echo the request flaged as response,
all other elements are unchanged.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13019
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Jun 4 17:39:21 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
With the source3/ based clilist.c, we can't test all infolevels where
this matters (see callers of get_dirent_ea_size()). But porting the
source4 based all-infolevel search code into source3/libsmb or doing
this one the reparse point test in the source4 infrastructure to me
seems like a lot of effort for moderate gain.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Change levels tested from 1 - 3 to 1 - 4 for NETLOGON_CONTROL_SET_DBFLAG
This change triggers a core dump in the server and so we add a knownfail
here. Following commit will fix (and remove known fail)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15465
Signed-off-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
I have captures where a client tries smb3 encryption on an anonymous session,
we used to allow that before commit da7dcc443f
was released with samba-4.15.0rc1.
Testing against Windows Server 2022 revealed that anonymous signing is always
allowed (with the session key derived from 16 zero bytes) and
anonymous encryption is allowed after one authenticated session setup on
the tcp connection.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15412
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
These demonstrate how anonymous encryption and signing work.
They pass against Windows 2022 as ad dc.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15412
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
This means ldb-samba/dsdb comparisons will be case-insensitive for
non-ASCII UTF-8 characters (within the bounds of the 16-bit casefold
table). And they will remain transitive.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
The default is ASCII only, which is used by SSSD and OpenChange.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Currently this fails like this:
test_ldb_comparison_fold_default_common: 118 errors out of 256
test_ldb_comparison_fold_default_ascii: 32 errors out of 100
test_ldb_comparison_fold_utf8_common: 40 errors out of 256
test_ldb_comparison_fold_utf8: 28 errors out of 100
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
By default we also export on the old and older passwords...
In order to do a kinit with a keytab it might we useful to
include only the current keys.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
gMSA password changes are usually triggered when the DC needs to fetch
the account’s keys and notices they are out of date.
Signed-off-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue May 14 23:29:46 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
This will allow the reading of SIDs that start with "s-", which
Windows allows, and we allow elsewhere.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10763
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We were mistakenly asserting something that did not happen with
Windows, because Samba already won't parse the DN string.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10763
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
9 hex-digit subauths like '0xABCDef123' will not fit in 32 bits, so
should be rejected on parsing.
In other situations, such as defaultSecurityDescriptor, overflowing
SID subauths on Windows will saturate to 0xffffffff, resulting in a
valid but probably meaningless SID. It is possible that in previous
testing we saw that here, but it is more likely I got confused. In any
case, now I see them being rejected, and that is good.
The saturating defaultSecurityDescriptor case is tested in
SidStringBehavioursThatWindowsAllows.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10763
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
And so should we.
Right now, these tests won't pass against Windows because they rely on
ldb pre-parsing of the SIDs, so they fail before Windows gets to see
them. Running them against Windows looks something like this, BTW:
SAMBA_SID_STRINGS_SKIP_LOCAL=1 \
SMB_CONF_PATH=st/ad_dc/etc/smb.conf \
PYTHONPATH=bin/default/python \
DC_SERVER=192.168.122.126 \
DC_USERNAME=Administrator DC_PASSWORD='xxx' \
python3 python/samba/tests/sid_strings.py
When things are right, the only failing tests should be from the
SidStringBehavioursThatSambaPrefers suite.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10763
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
It seems as if the well-known SID S-1-5-32-579
(DOMAIN_ALIAS_RID_ACCESS_CONTROL_ASSISTANCE_OPS) is
not always present -- specifically, it was not there on the
Windows machine used to develop these tests, but it is there on
the one I am now using.
S-1-5-32-545 (DOMAIN_ALIAS_RID_USERS) is surely going to exist,
so we use that instead.
That changes some of the assertions, making some NO_SUCH_OBJECTs
into successes.
For these tests we are only interested in the parsing of the SIDs, not
their meaning, so it's OK to change it.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10763
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
the less/greater conparisons were not case-sensitive, which made the whole
function non-transitive.
I think codepoint_cmpi() is currently only used for equality tests, so
nothing will change.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
is codepoint_cmpi as case-insensitive as it claims when it comes to
inequalities? (no, it is not!).
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon May 6 21:55:03 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
Inherit-only flag applies only to the container it was set to and it
shouldn't be automatically propagated to children.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15636
Signed-off-by: Anna Popova <popova.anna235@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Apr 29 10:56:48 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15636
Signed-off-by: Anna Popova <popova.anna235@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
In a dotless-I locale, we might meet an 'i' before we meet a byte with
the high bit set, in which case we still want the ldb casefold
comparison.
Many ldb operations will do some case-folding before getting here, so
hitting this might be quite rare even in those locales.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15637
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
In tr_TR and some other locales where the letter 'i' uppercases to
'İ', which is not ideal for LDB as we need certain strings like 'guid'
to casefold in the ASCII way.
In fixing https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15248) we solved
this problem in many cases, but for unindexed searches where the 'i'
is not the last character in the string. This test shows that.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15637
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Apr 16 05:02:30 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
We have changed strcasecmp_m() to return -1 in a place where it used
to return -3. This upset a test, but it shouldn't have: the exact
value of the negative int is not guaranteed by the function.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
for self->dn only. The other dn is a different story, next commit.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This will help avoid use-after-free of the internally cached ldb within
struct ldb_dn by ensuring that it lives as long.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Also removes knownfail for test that now passes
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15611
Signed-off-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
And add a known fail because there is a bug :-(
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15611
Signed-off-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This honours MS-GKDI 3.1.4.1.1 Creating a New Root Key
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
These show that the new root key should be based on the server
configuration object, not just hardcoded defaults.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Also removes the knownfail for the chunked transfer test
Signed-off-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15611
Adds http test client to excercise the http client library
and a blackbox test to run the client. This client is built
only with selftest
also adds a knownfail for the test
Signed-off-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15611
In the best case, this would have leaked.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Mar 20 04:53:57 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
Since 87f67d3369 samba-tool domain exportkeytab has
silently unlinked the given target file. Instead, the administrator now needs
to specify a file that does not exist.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
This mode will allow keytabs to be exported with all current keys added
to historical keys, which will be useful in a domain with many gMSA
servers that require wireshark decryption.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
We do this by setting the start time to being 10 hours 5min earlier
than now.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Mar 3 23:33:44 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jo Sutton <josutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Feb 28 04:45:48 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
The reasoning behind this is described in the previous commit message,
but essentially this should either be wrapped in certificate blocks and
imported as PEM, or converted back to binary and imported as DER.
I've opted for the latter since it's how it used to work before it
regressed in 157335ee93.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15557
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Nagy <gabriel.nagy@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
As of 8231eaf856, the NDES feature is no longer required on Windows, as
cert auto-enroll can use the certificate from the LDAP request.
However, 157335ee93 changed the implementation to convert the LDAP
certificate to base64 due to it failing to cleanly convert to a string.
Because of insufficient test coverage I missed handling the part where
NDES is disabled or not reachable and the LDAP certificate was imported.
The call to load_der_x509_certificate now fails with an error because it
expects binary data, yet it receives a base64 encoded string.
This adds a test to confirm the issue.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15557
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Nagy <gabriel.nagy@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Commit e07f8901ec broke handling of NT4 domains
which lack a DNS domain names. As the dns_name is NULL, talloc_steal(dns_name)
returns NULL, which causes _wbint_ListTrustedDomains to return
NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY.
To make things worse, at that point the new struct netr_DomainTrust is not yet
initialized correctly and the "out->count = n + 1" already increased the array
counter at the start of the loop without initializing it.
Later when NDR-pushing the result in dcesrv_call_dispatch_local(), the ndr_push() can
crash when accesssing the ununitialized values:
2023-12-08T14:07:42.759691+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: ===============================================================
2023-12-08T14:07:42.759702+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11: Segmentation fault in winbindd (wb[ADDOMAIN]) (domain child [ADDOMAIN]) pid 157227 (4.20.0pre1-DEVELOPERBUILD)
2023-12-08T14:07:42.759712+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: If you are running a recent Samba version, and if you think this problem is not yet fixed in the latest versions, please consider reporting this bug, see https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bug_Reporting
2023-12-08T14:07:42.759723+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: ===============================================================
2023-12-08T14:07:42.759730+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: PANIC (pid 157227): Signal 11: Segmentation fault in 4.20.0pre1-DEVELOPERBUILD
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: BACKTRACE: 36 stack frames:
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #0 bin/shared/private/libgenrand-samba4.so(log_stack_trace+0x1f) [0x7f1396acd441]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #1 bin/shared/private/libgenrand-samba4.so(smb_panic_log+0x20f) [0x7f1396acd3d5]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #2 bin/shared/private/libgenrand-samba4.so(smb_panic+0x18) [0x7f1396acd3f0]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #3 bin/shared/private/libgenrand-samba4.so(+0x2eb5) [0x7f1396acceb5]
92023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #4 bin/shared/private/libgenrand-samba4.so(+0x2eca) [0x7f1396acceca]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #5 /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x3dbb0) [0x7f139687abb0]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #6 bin/shared/private/libsamba-security-samba4.so(ndr_push_dom_sid2+0x2a) [0x7f13977e5437]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #7 bin/shared/libndr-standard.so.0(ndr_push_netr_DomainTrust+0x4ad) [0x7f1396deb64c]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #8 bin/shared/libndr-standard.so.0(ndr_push_netr_DomainTrustList+0x204) [0x7f1396dec7a9]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #9 bin/shared/private/libndr-samba4.so(+0x239bf9) [0x7f1397639bf9]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #10 winbindd: domain child [ADDOMAIN](winbind__op_ndr_push+0x5a) [0x55741e6857a8]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #11 bin/shared/libdcerpc-server-core.so.0(dcesrv_call_dispatch_local+0x49b) [0x7f1397be6219]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #12 winbindd: domain child [ADDOMAIN](winbindd_dual_ndrcmd+0x375) [0x55741e67a204]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #13 winbindd: domain child [ADDOMAIN](+0x9cf0d) [0x55741e674f0d]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #14 winbindd: domain child [ADDOMAIN](+0x9f792) [0x55741e677792]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #15 bin/shared/private/libtevent-samba4.so(tevent_common_invoke_fd_handler+0x121) [0x7f139802f816]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #16 bin/shared/private/libtevent-samba4.so(+0x19cef) [0x7f139803bcef]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #17 bin/shared/private/libtevent-samba4.so(+0x1a3dc) [0x7f139803c3dc]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #18 bin/shared/private/libtevent-samba4.so(+0x15b52) [0x7f1398037b52]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #19 bin/shared/private/libtevent-samba4.so(_tevent_loop_once+0x113) [0x7f139802e1db]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #20 winbindd: domain child [ADDOMAIN](+0xa03ca) [0x55741e6783ca]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #21 winbindd: domain child [ADDOMAIN](+0x9ba9c) [0x55741e673a9c]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #22 bin/shared/private/libtevent-samba4.so(_tevent_req_notify_callback+0xba) [0x7f139803194a]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #23 bin/shared/private/libtevent-samba4.so(+0xfadb) [0x7f1398031adb]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #24 bin/shared/private/libtevent-samba4.so(_tevent_req_done+0x25) [0x7f1398031b07]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #25 bin/shared/private/libtevent-samba4.so(+0xf125) [0x7f1398031125]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #26 bin/shared/private/libtevent-samba4.so(+0xe9cf) [0x7f13980309cf]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #27 bin/shared/private/libtevent-samba4.so(tevent_common_invoke_immediate_handler+0x207) [0x7f1398030343]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #28 bin/shared/private/libtevent-samba4.so(tevent_common_loop_immediate+0x37) [0x7f13980304b5]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #29 bin/shared/private/libtevent-samba4.so(+0x1a332) [0x7f139803c332]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #30 bin/shared/private/libtevent-samba4.so(+0x15b52) [0x7f1398037b52]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #31 bin/shared/private/libtevent-samba4.so(_tevent_loop_once+0x113) [0x7f139802e1db]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #32 winbindd: domain child [ADDOMAIN](main+0x1689) [0x55741e6b210a]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #33 /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x27b8a) [0x7f1396864b8a]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #34 /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0x8b) [0x7f1396864c4b]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760443+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: #35 winbindd: domain child [ADDOMAIN](_start+0x25) [0x55741e63a045]
2023-12-08T14:07:42.760685+00:00 localadmember.addom.samba.example.com log.winbindd[157227]: smb_panic(): calling panic action [cd /data/git/samba/scratch3 && /data/git/samba/scratch3/selftest/gdb_backtrace 157227 ./bin/winbindd]
Deferring assignment of r->out.domains->array and r->out.domains->count to the
end of the function ensures we don't return inconsistent state in case of an
error.
Also, r->out.domains is already set by the NDR layer, no need to create and
assign a struct netr_DomainTrustList object.
Using talloc_move() ensures we don't leave dangling pointers. Better to crash
reliably on accessing NULL, then accessing some unknown memory via a wild
pointer. As talloc_move() can't fail, there's no need to check the return value.
And using a struct initializer ensures all members are properly initialized.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15533
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Jan 20 14:23:51 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
The synthetic_pathref() call in shadow_copy2_get_real_filename_at()
fails if shadow:snapdir is set outside of the share root, it creates
an absolute path and non_widelink_open() blocks that.
We don't need shadow_copy2_get_real_filename_at() anymore because the
dirfsp already points at the correct directory in the snapshot
directory. So get_real_filename_full_scan_at() just works fine.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15556
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Jan 16 19:44:53 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
Now that check_any_access_fsp() is broadly used consistently to
restrict access for all modifying operations, we can add a check for
previous versions to check_any_access_fsp() and it gets enforced
consistently.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13688
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Frankly, I can't remember why I added this as part of bug 13688. The
goal of the corresponding test is to verify a write on a read-only
file handle fails. As the file is opened O_RDONLY, the write will fail
anyway and there's no need to inject the error.
To make things worse, having the error injected meant we didn't notice
when the underlying logic of forcing the open to be done with O_RDONLY
was done as O_RDWR, resulting in the write on the handle to succeed.
This happened when we introduced reopen_from_fsp(): the initial
pathref open of a path with a twrp value was correctly detected and
handled by shadow_copy2_openat(). However, when converting the pathref
open to a real one via reopen_from_fsp(), shadow_copy2_openat() only
sees the magic /proc/fd path and has no way of inferring that this was
originating from a prevous version open with a twrp value.
Tl;dr: we can just remove this error injection, it is not needed, the
correct fix is to implement this in the SMB layer which is done in the
subsequent commits.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13688
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15544
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Jan 2 20:37:01 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
Right now we can't traverse a subdirectory in a snapshot which was
deleted in the current set of files.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15544
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Dec 21 21:19:30 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This will return the previous password, but the pattern is to include
the option in the returned attribute name, so we need to use
vatter["raw_attr"], not 'a'.
This changes the behaviour for the ;rounds= option used when we hold
the plaintext password (possibly under GPG encryption).
This is now consistant with other parameters in the LDAP attribute,
and is now included in the returned attribute name.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This is consistant with ;format= support for time attributes and
other users of this parameter style elsewhere in LDAP.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
A side effect of being able to generate at read time unicodePwd for a gMSA is that we can also generate the unicodePwd from a virtualSambaGPG password.
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This pre-hashed value may be more practical to use than the random "UTF-16"
password. In particular it is easy to compare with the DB values.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
If a client connects to a non-public address first followed by a connect
to public address with the same client_guid and a connection to
the non-public address gets disconnected first, we hit by a use-after-free
talloc_get_type_abort() called from release_ip() as
"xconn" is already gone, taking smbd_release_ip_state with it.
We need to decide between calling ctdbd_unregister_ips() by default, as
it means the tcp connection is really gone and ctdb needs to remove the
'tickle' information. But when a connection was passed to a different
smbd process, we need to use ctdbd_passed_ips() as the tcp connection is
still alive and the 'tickle' information should not be removed within
ctdb.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15523
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
This demonstrates the crash that happens if a client connects to a
non-public address first followed by a connect
to public address with the same client_guid and a connection to
the non-public address gets disconnected first, we hit by a
use-after-free talloc_get_type_abort() called from release_ip() as
"xconn" is already gone, taking smbd_release_ip_state with it.
Note that we also need to mark some subtests as flapping
as there's a 2nd problem that happens in the interaction
between smbd processes and ctdb when passing a multichannel
connection to an existing process, it means we sometimes
loose the 'tickle' information within ctdb to that tcp connection.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15523
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
From the file itself:
> # The fl2000dc environment is provisioned with the --plaintext-secrets option
> # running the ecnrypted secrets tests on it and expecting them to fail.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
These tests have been set up to fail by smb.conf options, partly
in order to test those options.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
These tests are expected to fail because the handling of GET_ANC has
deliberately been degraded in this environment (in order to test an
upgrade path, long story).
> We now show this is in effect by the fact that tests now fail.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
To quote the original commit:
> Note that the rpc.echo tests for the testallowed and testdenied users
> fail, because we don't backup the secrets for these users. So these
> tests failing proves that the lab-DC testenv is correct.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Dec 1 08:06:44 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
If it is a wire claim (which is probably most common), the checking
and sorting has already happened. We don't need to make a copy to
sort and check.
In either case, there is still a copy step to make the conditional ACE
token.
This shuffles around some knownfails because the claim_v1_copy()
function we were using is checking for duplicates, which we don't
always want. That will be fixed soon.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This roughly returns things to where they were a few commits ago, with
the claims being checked for uniqueness.
The difference is the claims will be sorted afterwards, and the
uniqueness check will be far more efficient on large claims.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This changes the behaviour when one of the strings is NULL. Previously
a single NULL string would be ignored, and two would cause an error.
That will be restored in the next commit.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
And we allocate all the values together as an array, because
we might as well.
This and the next couple of commits might look like steps backwards,
and they are, but they allow us to get a run-up to leap over a big
fence.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Our composite comparisons are currently all wrong.
Soon they will be fixed, but we are going to have an inflection point
where we switch from the naive compare-everything approach to a sort
based comparison, and we want to test both sides. Also, we use these
tests for a little bit of timing, which reveals it is all fast enough.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We had two sets of test vectors (Windows ground-truth for SDDL
compilation) that got mixed up.
The "oversized ACLs" set is ACLs that contain repeated ACEs, like
"D:P(D;;;;;MP)(D;;;;;MP)" -- Windows will assign a size to the ACL
that is greater than the sum of the ACEs, while Samba will not (in
part because we don't actually store a size for the ACL, instead
calculating it on the fly from the size of the ACEs).
The "TX integers" set is for resource attribute ACEs with octet-string
data that contains pure integers (lacking '#' characters) in their
SDDL, like «(RA;;;;;WD;("bar",TX,0x0,0077,00,0077,00))». We used to
think that was weird, and that RA-TX ACEs should contain octet-strings
in the conditional ACE style. But now we have realised it's not weird,
it's normal, and we have fixed our handling of these ACEs.
As a result of this mix-up, some of the tests labelled as "oversized
ACLs" started passing when we fixed the TX integer problem, and that
was confusing. All of the removed tests are already on the TX integer
set -- the removed ones were duplicates.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We are going to parse octet strings like Windows (as opposed to like
Windows docs), so the tests need changing.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Douglas Bagnall <dbagnall@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Nov 23 00:32:33 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
When returning WERR_MORE_DATA the winreg server needs to indicate the
required buffer size.
Guenther
Signed-off-by: Guenther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Nov 20 04:50:00 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
When returning WERR_MORE_DATA the winreg server needs to indicate the
required buffer size.
Guenther
Signed-off-by: Guenther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This allows the usage test to pass on our CI hosts without
python-crypto and not uxsuccess on hosts with it.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
The wrong number of semicolons is usually one less than count (which
counts sections separated by semicolons), except when count is zero.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
The knownfail will stay around for a few commits, because the message
we get is slightly wrong.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Given two opens on a file:
1. Windows open with delete-on-close
2. POSIX open with delete-on-close set
When handle 1 is closed processing in has_other_nonposix_opens_fn() will not
delete the file as (fsp->posix_flags & FSP_POSIX_FLAGS_OPEN) is false, so
has_other_nonposix_opens() will return true which is wrong.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15517
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Nov 13 19:34:29 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Nov 9 09:01:25 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
This is what Windows does, and it removes a couple of knownfails.
We can change it here cheaply without affecting the core dom_sid code,
which is good because there seem to be other places where we need the
uppercase S (for example in ldap search <SID=> queries).
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Oct 27 21:19:35 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
This shows that read_symlink_reparse() is broken when trying to
replace an absolute with a relative filename within a
share.
read_symlink_reparse() is used only in openat_pathref_fsp_nosymlink()
so far to chase symlinks for non-lcomp path components. Chasing lcomp
symlinks is done through non_widelink_open(), which gets it right.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
The parser is able to convert data from binary to XML (it generates an
empty <Value> tag) but not the other way around. This is a common
occurrence for empty multitext fields.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Nagy <gabriel.nagy@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Nagy <gabriel.nagy@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
Rename test function names that were starting to get very long.
They were all prefixed with the test name, stop doing that and use double underscore for better separation.
e.g. AuthPolicyCmdTestCase.test_authentication_policy_list_json
becomes AuthPolicyCmdTestCase.test_list__json
The claim types and value types test cases have been split into two testcases.
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
User2User tgs requests use the session key of the additional
ticket instead of the long term keys based on the password.
In addition User2User also asserts that client and server
are the same account (cecked based on the sid).
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15492
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Oct 16 15:38:12 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
This revealed a bug in our dirsync code, so we mark
test_search_with_dirsync_deleted_objects as knownfail.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13595
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This makes LDAP_DIRSYNC_OBJECT_SECURITY the only behaviour provided by
Samba.
Having a second access control system withing the LDAP stack is unsafe
and this layer is incomplete.
The current system gives all accounts that have been given the
GUID_DRS_GET_CHANGES extended right SYSTEM access. Currently in Samba
this equates to full access to passwords as well as "RODC Filtered
attributes" (often used with confidential attributes).
Rather than attempting to correctly filter for secrets (passwords) and
these filtered attributes, as well as preventing search expressions for
both, we leave this complexity to the acl_read module which has this
facility already well tested.
The implication is that callers will only see and filter by attribute
in DirSync that they could without DirSync.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
The aim here is to document the expected (even if not implemented)
SEARCH_FLAG_RODC_ATTRIBUTE vs SEARCH_FLAG_CONFIDENTIAL, behaviour, so
that any change once CVE-2023-4154 is fixed can be noted.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
If the client requested FILE_OVERWRITE[_IF], we're implicitly adding
FILE_WRITE_DATA to the open_access_mask in open_file_ntcreate(), but for the
access check we're using access_mask which doesn't contain the additional
right, which means we can end up truncating a file for which the user has
only read-only access via an SD.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15439
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
We correctly handle this and just return ENOENT (NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND).
Remove knowfail.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15422
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
