IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This reverts commit 8a2ce5c47c.
Jelmer pointed out that these are also in use by other LDB databases - not only
SAMDB ones.
Autobuild-User: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer <mdw@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Sun Oct 17 13:37:16 UTC 2010 on sn-devel-104
They're only in use by SAMDB code.
Autobuild-User: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer <mdw@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Sun Oct 17 09:40:13 UTC 2010 on sn-devel-104
This includes dom_sid.h and security_token.h and will be moved
to the top level shortly.
Andrew Bartlett
Autobuild-User: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Tue Oct 12 03:35:36 UTC 2010 on sn-devel-104
Since this one relies on the right server loadparm context which we aren't able
to provide over torture.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
At first I got the impression we are not handling those cases,
but after those tests surprisingly passed I saw that
we have correct behavior implemented in a helper function.
So I decided to commit those tests in case someone change the
strange-looking check for DRSUAPI_DRS_ADD_REF flag in
a function that handles delete operation :)
Now that we support SePrintOperatorPrivilege, an interaction between
the spoolss tests and the privileges tests cause a failure. The
failure happens like this:
- the spoolss.access test creates and then deletes an account with
SePrintOperatorPrivilege privilege
- this leaves the privileges database with an entry for a deleted
account that is still visible via LSA calls. This is correct
behaviour (verified against w2k8r2)
- the lsa.privileges test then enumerates all accounts that have at
least one privilege, and gets the SID for the deleted account
- it then called LookupNames and LookupSids on this deleted account,
and gets an error.
The fix is to not call LookupSids and LookupNames on sids which have
SID_NAME_UNKNOWN as the type
Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
In case differences in messages are:
1. Attributes with different values, i.e. 'replace'
2. Those attributes are back-link attributes
then we just warn about those differences.
It turns out windows doesn't send all values for back-link
attributes in replicated_object but in linked_attributes.
I consider this as workaround for the problem.
A better solution might be to merge linked_attribute values
into replacted_objects before comparing those with LDB result
(although this will work for Win2k8 and latter)
we have already opened.
Added 'config_dn' and 'schema_dn' members which are to be used
later for extending the test_FetchData() to be executed
against every partition in case partition is not specified explicitly.
DsSyncText.site_name was removed also as it is not used anymore
