IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
send unaligned unicode strings sometimes!
Fixed our handling of the workgroup name tacked on the end of the
NT1 negprot response (a unaligned unicode)
fixed a couple of places where we should be using the message_end fns instead
of pre-calculated buffer lengths
(This used to be commit 86613493a9)
when copying to a full disk problem, I discovered that we were not allowing
the delete on close flag to be set properly, this led to other things, and
after investigation of the proper delete on close semantics and their relationship
to the file_share_delete flag I discovered there were some cases where we
weren't doing the deny modes properly. And this after only 5 years working
on them..... :-) :-).
So here's the latest attempt. I realised the delete on close flag needs to
be set across all smbds with a dev/ino pair open - in addition, the delete
on close flag, allow share delete and delete access requested all need to
be stored in the share mode tdb.
The "delete_on_close" entry in the fsp struct is now redundant and should
really be removed. This may also mean we can get rid of the "iterate_fsp"
calls that I didn't like adding in the first place. Whilst doing this patch,
I also discovered we needed to do the se_map_generic() call for file opens
and POSIX ACL mapping, so I added that also.
This code, although ugly, now passes the deny mode torture tests plus the
delete on close tests I added. I do need to add one more multiple connection
delete on close test to make sure I got the semantics exactly right, plus we
should also (as Andrew suggested) move to random testing here.
The good news is that NT should now correctly delete the file on disk
full error when copying to a disk :-).
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 51987684bd)
a byte range lock (write lock only, but Win2k breaks on read lock also so I
do the same) - if you think about why, this is obvious. Also fixed our client
code to do level II oplocks, if requested, and fixed the code where we would
assume the client wanted level II if it advertised itself as being level II
capable - it may not want that.
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 213cd0b519)
