IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
We may have a dn in '<SID=...>' form and ldb_dn_get_linearized()
just gives in empty string.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13300
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
This implements the handling for FPO-enabled attributes, see
[MS-ADTS] 3.1.1.5.2.3 Special Classes and Attributes:
FPO-enabled attributes: member, msDS-MembersForAzRole,
msDS-NeverRevealGroup, msDS-NonMembers, msDS-RevealOnDemandGroup,
msDS-ServiceAccount.
Note there's no msDS-ServiceAccount in any schema (only
msDS-HostServiceAccount and that's not an FPO-enabled attribute
at least not in W2008R2)
msDS-NonMembers always generates NOT_SUPPORTED against W2008R2.
See also [MS-SAMR] 3.1.1.8.9 member.
We now create foreignSeurityPrincipal objects on the fly (as needed).
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13300
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
We have several schema related tests, which already prove
that for the defaultObjectCategory attribute.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13307
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
It's quite likely that there're more than one attribute and we may
already altered values.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13307
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
We have several tests which already test that, we can avoid doing
searches at all in that case.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13307
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Simo Sorce <idra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Simo Sorce <idra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Mar 19 20:29:28 CET 2018 on sn-devel-144
Signed-off-by: Andrej Gessel <Andrej.Gessel@janztec.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13319
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Mar 17 04:04:32 CET 2018 on sn-devel-144
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Mar 13 23:48:28 CET 2018 on sn-devel-144
This is not strictly needed to fig bug 13272, but it makes sense to also
fix this while fixing the overall ACL checking logic.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13272
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This is used to pass information about which password change operation (change
or reset) the acl module validated, down to the password_hash module.
It's very important that both modules treat the request identical.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13272
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Will be used to pass "user password change" vs "password reset" from the
ACL to the password_hash module, ensuring both modules treat the request
identical.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13272
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This is needed, because a later commit will let the acl module add a
control to the change request msg and we must ensure that this is only
done once.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13272
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This change ensures we correctly treat the following LDIF
dn: cn=testuser,cn=users,...
changetype: modify
delete: userPassword
add: userPassword
userPassword: thatsAcomplPASS1
as a password reset. Because delete and add element counts are both
one, the ACL module wrongly treated this as a password change
request.
For a password change we need at least one value to delete and one value
to add. This patch ensures we correctly check attributes and their
values.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13272
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Note that the request using the clearTextPassword attribute for the
password change is already correctly rejected by the server.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13272
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
By default, use tdb, but otherwise read the value from backendStore.
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reload the schema just after getting the tranaction lock
but before the transaction counter is bumped.
This ensures we reload the schema exactly once but with
the DB locked.
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
It appears that there was a race condition between searching for the
attribute & class definitions, and searching for the schema object, if
the schema was changed in-between the two searches.
This is likely the cause of ldap_schema being flapping.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12889
Signed-off-by: Bob Campbell <bobcampbell@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
With the lmdb patches, I have cleanly observed the database being read
in between the commit of the metadata.tdb and the eventual commits of
the individual partitions.
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
During a read lock, we find ourselves seeing an unchanged schema, but
reading any updates to the metadata.tdb (in the case of lmdb, where
reads do not block writes).
The alternative is to read-lock the entire metadata.tdb, however, this
allows more concurrency by allowing reads not to block writes.
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This is critical as otherwise we can read a sequence number in advance
of the data that it represents and so have a false cache.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
This simplifies selecting a specific test to run.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlet <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Mar 3 05:19:38 CET 2018 on sn-devel-144
Zero libnet_LookupName out struct before setting results,
preventing false result interpretation.
Signed-off-by: Swen Schillig <swen@vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
In addition to converting the except line another line is also added
for each except to extract the tuple contents.
Signed-off-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
