IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
We need to use CTDB_CONTROL_TCP_CLIENT instead of CTDB_CONTROL_TCP_ADD.
CTDB_CONTROL_TCP_CLIENT has support for 2 modes in newer ctdb versions:
- with struct ctdb_control_tcp it only supports ipv4.
- with struct ctdb_control_tcp_addr it supports ipv4 and ipv6.
You need new header files which defines struct ctdb_control_tcp_addr,
but at runtime it should be fine to work against older
ctdb versions (<= 1.0.68).
metze
version.h changes rather frequently. Since it is included via includes.h,
this means each C file will be a cache miss. This applies to the following
situations:
* When building a new package with a new Samba version
* building in a git branch after calling mkversion.sh
after a new commit (i.e. virtually always)
This patch improves the situation in the following way:
* remove inlude "version.h" from includes.h
* Use samba_version_string() instead of SAMBA_VERSION_STRING
in files that use no other macro from version.h instead of
SAMBA_VERSION_STRING.
* explicitly include "version.h" in those files that use more
macros from "version.h" than just SAMBA_VERSION_STRING.
Michael
"It seems to me that if the lock is already held by another process when we
enter this code, there is a race between the timeout and the granting. If
the lock is subsequently granted, the process releasing the lock will signal
the wait variable (or whatever) and our process will be scheduled. However,
if the timeout occurs before we are scheduled, the timeout will be delivered
first.
We will have the lock but will forget we have the lock, and never release
it."
Jeremy.
The splice manpage explicitly requires loff_t as offset. Copy "offset" there.
Probably not required, but I wanted to make sure it's as required.
Splice blocks with large buffers. For me it worked with 16k and blocked with
32k and beyond. It would be nice to see a clarification in the manpage of
splice for this behaviour.
Splice if used with an offset increments the offset. From the manpage this was
at least not entirely obvious :-)
I haven't yet activated this (try_splice_call ist still false by default), it
needs more testing.
Volker
