IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Nov 17 05:27:39 UTC 2021 on sn-devel-184
Unicode has format control characters that affect the appearance —
including the apparent order — of other characters. Some of these,
like the bidi controls (for mixing left-to-right scripts with
right-to-left scripts) can be used make text that means one thing look
very much like it means another thing.
The potential for duplicity using these characters has recently been
publicised under the name “Trojan Source”, and CVE-2021-42694. A
specific example, as it affects the Rust language is CVE-2021-42574.
We don't have many format control characters in our code — in fact,
just the non-breaking space (\u200b) and the redundant BOM thing
(\ufeff), and this test aims to ensure we keep it that way.
The test uses a series of allow-lists and deny-lists to check most
text files for unknown format control characters. The filtering is
fairly conservative but not exhaustive. For example, XML and text
files are checked, but UTF-16 files are not.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14901
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
[metze@samba.org removed unused tests for a feature that
was removed before merging]
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14901
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
If multiple calls to get_tgt() or get_service_ticket() specify different
expected parameters, we want to perform the request again so that the
checking can be performed, rather than reusing a previously obtained
ticket and potentially skipping checks.
It should be fine to cache tickets with the same expected parameters, as
tickets that fail to be obtained will not be stored in the cache, so the
checking will happen for every call.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14561
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Because the sam account name + the dns host name is used as the
default user principal name, we need to check for collisions between
these. Fixes are coming in upcoming patches.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14564
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This did not actually *force* the creation of a duplicate SPN, it just
ignored the client-side check for the existing copy. Soon we are going
to enforce SPN uniqueness on the server side, and this --force will not
work. This will make the --force test fail, and if that tests fail, so
will others that depend the duplicate values. So we remove those tests.
It is wrong-headed to try to make duplicate SPNs in any case, which is
probably why there is no sign of anyone ever having used this option.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14564
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Following the convention and making testing easier
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14564
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This makes it easier to convert tests that don't have good messages.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14564
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
You can give ldb_err() it a number, an LdbError, or a sequence of
numbers, and it will return the corresponding strings. Examples:
ldb_err(68) # "LDB_ERR_ENTRY_ALREADY_EXISTS"
LDB_ERR_LUT[68] # "LDB_ERR_ENTRY_ALREADY_EXISTS"
expected = (ldb.ERR_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS,
ldb.ERR_INVALID_CREDENTIALS)
try:
foo()
except ldb.LdbError as e:
self.fail(f"got {ldb_err(e)}, expected one of {ldb_err(expected)}")
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14564
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
