IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
smbd has no business modifying a shadow copy filesystem, it should be read-only.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Aug 7 17:59:25 UTC 2019 on sn-devel-184
smbd has no business modifying a shadow copy filesystem, it should be read-only.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
smbd has no business modifying a shadow copy filesystem, it should be read-only.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
smbd has no business modifying a shadow copy filesystem, it should be read-only.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
smbd has no business modifying a shadow copy filesystem, it should be read-only.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
smbd has no business modifying a shadow copy filesystem, it should be read-only.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
smbd has no business modifying a shadow copy filesystem, it should be read-only.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
smbd has no business modifying a shadow copy filesystem, it should be read-only.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
smbd has no business modifying a shadow copy filesystem, it should be read-only.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
smbd has no business modifying a shadow copy filesystem, it should be read-only.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Stacked VFS modules might use the file name, not the file
handle. Looking at you, vfs_fruit...
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13455
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Can be used by callers to determine if a path is in fact pointing at a
file in a snapshot. Will be used in the next commit.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13688
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Not used for now, all existing callers pass NULL.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13688
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Dec 18 13:32:00 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Jul 1 07:20:28 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Jun 18 07:03:18 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Jun 1 02:58:53 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Not currently used - no logic changes inside.
This will make it possible to pass down a long-lived talloc
context from the loading function for modules to use instead
of having them internally all use talloc_autofree_context()
which is a hidden global.
Updated all known module interface numbers, and added a
WHATSNEW.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Apr 22 01:17:00 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
Snapshot paths are a read-only filesystem.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12531
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Uri Simchoni <uri@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Jan 30 22:26:29 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
Rationale:
VFS calls must act like their POSIX equivalents, and the POSIX versions
*only* set errno on a failure. There is actually code in the upper smbd
layers that depends on errno being correct on a fail return from a VFS call.
For a compound VFS module like this, a common pattern is :
SMB_VFS_CALL_X()
{
int ret;
syscall1();
ret = syscall2();
syscall3();
return ret;
}
Where if *any* of the contained syscallX()'s fail, they'll set errno.
However, the actual errno we should return is *only* the one returned
if syscall2() fails (the others are lstat's checking for existence etc.).
So what we should do to correctly return only the errno from syscall2() is:
SMB_VFS_CALL_X()
{
int ret;
int saved_errno = 0;
syscall1()
ret = syscall2();
if (ret == -1) {
saved_errno = errno;
}
syscall3()
if (saved_errno != 0) {
errno = saved_errno;
}
return ret;
}
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12531
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Uri Simchoni <uri@samba.org>
Completely cleans up the horrible shadow_copy2_strip_snapshot()
and adds an explaination of what it's actually trying to do.
* This function does two things.
*
* 1). Checks if an incoming filename is already a
* snapshot converted pathname.
* If so, it returns the pathname truncated
* at the snapshot point which will be used
* as the connectpath, and then does an early return.
*
* 2). Checks if an incoming filename contains an
* SMB-layer @GMT- style timestamp.
* If so, it strips the timestamp, and returns
* both the timestamp and the stripped path
* (making it cwd-relative).
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12531
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Uri Simchoni <uri@samba.org>
