IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
rpmlint has a check for this and prefers to call chdir() before
chroot(). If not it will complain with
missing-call-to-chdir-with-chroot. The old code equivalent secure. See
http://unixwiz.net/techtips/chroot-practices.html
This removes several unneeded talloc_tos() calls.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Feb 13 03:50:54 CET 2016 on sn-devel-144
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Jan 22 11:06:05 CET 2016 on sn-devel-144
This is in preperation of connection passing where we have to set
seq_low to the mid from the negprot we've handed over.
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Oct 7 00:54:34 CEST 2015 on sn-devel-104
Add an option to wait_for_read_send(), so that the request, upon
calling back, report whether the socket actually contains data
or is in EOF/error state. EOF is signalled via the EPIPE error.
This is useful for clients which do not expect data to arrive but
wait for readability to detect a closed socket (i.e. they do not
intend to actually read the socket when it's readable). Actual data
arrival would indicate a bug in this case, so the check can
be used to print an error message.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11397
Signed-off-by: Uri Simchoni <urisimchoni@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11373
Guenther
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Pair-Programmed-With: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Mainly to have the new macros actually used in the code.
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Jun 11 04:34:50 CEST 2015 on sn-devel-104
What?
This patch gets rid of the central shared memory segment referenced by
"profile_p". Instead, every smbd gets a static profile_area where it collects
profiling data. Once a second, every smbd writes this profiling data into a
record of its own in a "smbprofile.tdb". smbstatus -P does a tdb_traverse on this
database and sums up what it finds.
Why?
At least in my perception sysv IPC has not the best reputation on earth. The
code before this patch uses shmat(). Samba ages ago has developed a good
abstraction of shared memory: It's called tdb.
The main reason why I started this is that I have a request to become
more flexible with profiling data. Samba should be able to collect data
per share or per user, something which is almost impossible to do with
a fixed structure. My idea is to for example install a profile area per
share and every second marshall this into one tdb record indexed by share
name. smbstatus -P would then also collect the data and either aggregate
them or put them into individual per-share statistics. This flexibility
in the data model is not really possible with one fixed structure.
But isn't it slow?
Well, I don't think so. I can't really prove it, but I do believe that on large
boxes atomically incrementing a shared memory value for every SMB does show up
due to NUMA effects. With this patch the hot code path is completely
process-local. Once a second every smbd writes into a central tdb, this of
course does atomic operations. But it's once a second, not on every SMB2 read.
There's two places where I would like to improve things: With the current code
all smbds wake up once a second. With 10,000 potentially idle smbds this will
become noticable. That's why the current only starts the timer when something has
changed.
The second place is the tdb traverse: Right now traverse is blocking in the
sense that when it has to switch hash chains it will block. With mutexes, this
means a syscall. I have a traverse light in mind that works as follows: It
assumes a locked hash chain and then walks the complete chain in one run
without unlocking in between. This way the caller can do nonblocking locks in
the first round and only do blocking locks in a second round. Also, a lot of
syscall overhead will vanish. This way smbstatus -P will have almost zero
impact on normal operations.
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
This attaches a smbXsrv_connection to a smbXsrv_client structure.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
These should be per client (based on the SMB >= 2.1 client_guid),
this is a preparation for multi-channel support.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This structure is supposed to hold the global state shared between
multiple connections from the same client.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
instead of manually assembling the address string
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
instead of manually assembling the address string
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
The case where the client starts with a SMB2 Negprot is already handled
in smbd_smb2_request_dispatch().
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10766
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Sep 9 13:02:21 CEST 2014 on sn-devel-104
MS-CIFS 2.2.4.42.2 states: "Pad (1 byte): This field is optional. When
using the NT LAN Manager dialect, this field can be used to align the
Data field to a 16-bit boundary relative to the start of the SMB Header.
If Unicode strings are being used, this field MUST be present. When
used, this field MUST be one padding byte long."
Always add the padding byte to all readx responses to avoid additional
complexity.
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Aug 6 12:15:57 CEST 2014 on sn-devel-104
These parameters are not really used currently, but may be in future.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
