IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This reverts commit 80c0b41689.
With the previous patch it is no longer required. We open
share_info.tdb as root when starting up rpcd_classic and keep it open.
Commit 80c0b41689 only fixed the
problem in one place, but we had it in a lot more places...
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15265
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Dec 20 11:20:51 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
This fixes a regression in commit f03665bb7e
The use of reload_services() has a lot of side effects, e.g. reopen of
log files and other things, which are only useful in smbd, but not in rpcd_classic.
It was also unloading the user and registry shares we loaded a few lines
above.
We need to do all (re-)loading as root, otherwise we won't be able
to read root only smb.conf files, access registry shares, ...
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15243
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15266
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Walker <awalker@ixsystems.com>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Dec 29 21:14:02 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
share_info.tdb has permissions of 0o600 and so we need
to become_root() prior to retrieving the security info.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15265
Signed-off-by: Andrew Walker <awalker@ixsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Dec 19 20:41:15 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15243
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Nov 18 19:17:31 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
Okay because lp_csc_policy() is an enum with 4 choices
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri May 20 19:59:07 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
This patch has two flaws: First, it does not cover api_RNetShareEnum()
for SMB1, and the second one is: To make this elegant, we would have
to restructure our share handling. It is really only listing shares
for which we have to pull in everything from smb.conf, registry,
usershares and potentially printers. What we should do is modify our
loadparm handling to only load share definitions on demand and for
listing shares handle all the potential sources specially. Add code
that walks the registry shares without adding them to our services
list and so on.
This patch is the quick&dirty way to fix the bug, the alternative
would be weeks or more. And hopefully nobody notices the SMB1
problem...
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15062
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed May 18 17:42:20 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
This reverts commit 322574834f.
Not strictly a revert anymore, but for future work we do need "dirfsp"
in create_file_default() passed through the VFS.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Quite a few places already had this in the caller, but not all. Rename
close_file() to close_file_free() appropriately. We'll factor out
close_file_smb() doing only parts of close_file_free() later.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This is a big patch, but all it does is replace all "p->session_info"
with "session_info" after introducing a local variable from
dcesrv_call_session_info(p->dce_call).
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
The call to messaging_send_all() skips ourselves. This is tested in
source3/script/tests/test_rpcclientsrvsvc.sh, which right now we only
survive because the rpcclient call spawns a new smbd, which reloads
smb.conf. Once you start running srvsvcd in a long-running daemon,
this fails.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
It's a bit shocking how many references we have to global
contexts. Make this a bit more obvious.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
To me this is then easier to figure out what is defined there, and
where it's exactly used.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This was supposed to be a shortcut to avoid passing dirfsp around as an explicit
function argument throughout the whole codebase when the new VFS design idea was
based on using *AT functions throughout the VFS.
Now that we've opted for basing the VFS on handles and *AT functions will only
be used in a much more limitted extent, it makes sense to remove this internal
dirfsp reference, otherwise the combination of internal fsp->dirfsp and
smb_fname->fsp is going to be a tough to wrap your head around.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Oct 2 21:00:05 UTC 2020 on sn-devel-184
As create_file_default() still need to be updated in the future to replace the
SMB_VFS_STAT() calls with AT-based versions, it asserts (dirfsp ==
dirfsp->conn->cwd_fsp).
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
With share_infos.tdb this is a locking order violation:
share_infos.tdb is level 4, brlock.tdb is level 2. Avoid this by first
walking the share_infos.tdb and then fetching all the brlock entries.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14355
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu May 14 22:06:32 UTC 2020 on sn-devel-184
To me this was not very transparent, and now that we have "ctr3" a
single indirect looks okay
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14355
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu May 14 19:43:27 UTC 2020 on sn-devel-184
Prototype is generated by the server compat parser.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Cabrero <scabrero@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We currently have the following substitution functions:
talloc_sub_basic()
talloc_sub_advanced()
talloc_sub_basic() currently substitutes a subset of talloc_sub_advanced().
We'll need a function X that only substitutes what talloc_sub_advanced()
substitutes *without* what talloc_sub_basic() does.
To get there rename talloc_sub_advanced() to talloc_sub_full(). A subsequent
commit will then bring back talloc_sub_advanced() as described above.
Examples with fictional replacement letters A and B. Currently:
talloc_sub_basic: A
talloc_sub_advanced: AB
New:
talloc_sub_basic: A
talloc_sub_advanced: B
talloc_sub_full: AB
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13745
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
All existing callers pass NULL, no change in behaviour.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13455
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
