IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Async read and write go synchronous in the same case,
so do the same here.
Remove knownfail.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15172
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Nov 17 05:55:42 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
Not yet used. Returns true if we're processing the last SMB2 request in a
compound.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15172
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Can easily be seen by doing make test TESTS=fruit
and looking in st/nt4_dc/smbd_test.log.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15210
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Nov 16 06:00:56 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
Only allow share connections if the server address matches
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
The intention of this option was to hide *files*. Before this patch we
also hide directories where new files are dropped.
This is a change in behaviour, but I think this option is niche enough
to justify not adding another parameter that we then need to test. If
workflows break with this change and people depend on directories also
to be hidden, we can still add the additional option value required.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Nov 7 22:58:33 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
Samba has always been mapping Windows EAs to the 'user' namespace on the
POSIX side. However, in the opposite direction, the mapping would also map
other user-readable POSIX EA namespaces to Windows EAs, only stripping the
'user' namespace prefix, and passing all other EA names verbatim.
This means any POSIX EA 'other.foo' collides with 'user.other.foo' on the
Windows side, hence the mapping of non-user namespaces is unreliable.
Also, copy operations via Windows would rename an existing POSIX EA
'other.foo' in the source file to 'user.other.foo' in the destination. The
'user' namespace, however, may not be enabled on the underlying filesystem,
leading to subtle failure modes like the ones reported in eg.
<https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15186>
Fix the issues by restricting the mapping to the 'user' POSIX EA namespace
consistently for either direction.
Link: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2022-September/137634.html
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15186
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kobras <kobras@puzzle-itc.de>
Reviewed-by: Michael Weiser <michael.weiser@atos.net>
Tested-by: Michael Weiser <michael.weiser@atos.net>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Probably doesn't do much in compiled code, but looks cleaner to me
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This is recent enough to justify just a README.Coding formatting change
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
subdir_of() calculates the share-relative rest for us, don't do the
strlen(connectpath) calculation twice. subdir_of() also checks that
the target properly ends on a directory. With just strncmp a symlink
to x->/aa/etc would qualify as in share /a, so a "get x/passwd" leads to a
pretty unfortunate result. This is the proper fix for bug 15207, so we
need to change the expected error code to OBJECT_PATH_NOT_FOUND
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15207
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jule Anger <janger@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Oct 25 11:27:02 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
If we get NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NOT_FOUND from smb2srv_client_connection_{pass,drop}()
we should just keep the connection and overwrite the stale record in
smbXsrv_client_global.tdb. It's basically a race with serverid_exists()
and a process that doesn't cleanly teardown.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15200
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
dbwrap_watched_watch_send() should typically be the last thing to call
before the db record is unlocked, as it's not that easy to undo.
In future we want to recover from smb2srv_client_connection_{pass,drop}()
returning NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND and it would add complexity if
would need to undo dbwrap_watched_watch_send() at that point.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15200
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
DBG_WARNING() already adds the function name as prefix.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15200
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
If we hit a race, when a client disconnects the connection after the initial
SMB2 Negotiate request, before the connection is completely passed to
process serving the given client guid, the temporary smbd which accepted the
new connection may already detected the disconnect and exitted before
the long term smbd servicing the client guid was able to send the
MSG_SMBXSRV_CONNECTION_PASSED message.
The result was a log message like this:
smbXsrv_client_connection_pass_loop: smb2srv_client_connection_passed() failed => NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND
and all connections belonging to the client guid were dropped,
because we called exit_server_cleanly().
Now we ignore NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND from
smb2srv_client_connection_passed() and let the normal
event loop detect the broken connection, so that only
that connection is terminated (not the whole smbd process).
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15200
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
The function smbd_server_connection_terminate_done() does not free subreq
which is allocated in smbXsrv_connection_shutdown_send, this can be a
memory leakage if multi-channel is enabled.
Suggested fix by haihua yang <hhyangdev@gmail.com>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15174
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Autobuild-User(master): Noel Power <npower@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Sep 23 09:51:20 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
This gives a nice speed up...
The following test with 256 commections all looping with open/close
on the same inode (share root) is improved drastically:
smbtorture //127.0.0.1/m -Uroot%test smb2.bench.path-contention-shared \
--option='torture:bench_path=' \
--option="torture:timelimit=60" \
--option="torture:nprocs=256" \
--option="torture:qdepth=1"
From something like this:
open[num/s=11536,avslat=0.011450,minlat=0.000039,maxlat=0.052707]
close[num/s=11534,avslat=0.010878,minlat=0.000022,maxlat=0.052342]
(only this commit with the close part reverted) to:
open[num/s=12722,avslat=0.009548,minlat=0.000051,maxlat=0.054338]
close[num/s=12720,avslat=0.010701,minlat=0.000033,maxlat=0.054372]
(with both patches) to:
open[num/s=37680,avslat=0.003471,minlat=0.000040,maxlat=0.061411]
close[num/s=37678,avslat=0.003440,minlat=0.000022,maxlat=0.051536]
So we are finally perform similar like we did in Samba 4.12,
which resulted in:
open[num/s=36846,avslat=0.003574,minlat=0.000043,maxlat=0.020378]
close[num/s=36844,avslat=0.003552,minlat=0.000026,maxlat=0.020321]
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15125
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This gives a nice speed up...
The following test with 256 commections all looping with open/close
on the same inode (share root) is improved drastically:
smbtorture //127.0.0.1/m -Uroot%test smb2.bench.path-contention-shared \
--option='torture:bench_path=' \
--option="torture:timelimit=60" \
--option="torture:nprocs=256" \
--option="torture:qdepth=1"
From some like this:
open[num/s=11536,avslat=0.011450,minlat=0.000039,maxlat=0.052707]
close[num/s=11534,avslat=0.010878,minlat=0.000022,maxlat=0.052342]
to:
open[num/s=13225,avslat=0.010504,minlat=0.000042,maxlat=0.054023]
close[num/s=13223,avslat=0.008971,minlat=0.000022,maxlat=0.053838]
But this is only half of the solution, the next commits will
add a similar optimization to the open code, at the end we'll
perform like we did in Samba 4.12:
open[num/s=37680,avslat=0.003471,minlat=0.000040,maxlat=0.061411]
close[num/s=37678,avslat=0.003440,minlat=0.000022,maxlat=0.051536]
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15125
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
It's good to have this in common as close_remove_share_mode()
and in the end we'll avoid get_existing_share_mode_lock()
and call them via share_mode_entry_prepare_{lock,unlock}(),
so that they can run under a tdb chainlock.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15125
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
close_share_mode_lock_prepare() will operates on share_mode_lock
in order to check if the object needs to be deleted or if
we can remove the share_mode_entry directly.
close_share_mode_lock_cleanup() will finish after the object
has been deleted.
We can reuse these function in close_directory() soon and
in the end we'll avoid get_existing_share_mode_lock()
and call them via share_mode_entry_prepare_{lock,unlock}(),
so that they can run under a tdb chainlock.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15125
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This inlines remove_oplock() into close_remove_share_mode() and
calls remove_share_oplock() and release_file_oplock() directly.
The idea is that we'll soon call remove_share_oplock()
under a tdb chainlock, while release_file_oplock() needs to be called outside.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15125
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
The logic is now similar to close_remove_share_mode().
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15125
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
We now use a goto done in order to skip the deletion part.
This means the code flow is now almost idential compared to
close_remove_share_mode().
It prepares to split common code to be shared by
close_remove_share_mode() and close_directory().
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15125
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This makes it much easier to understand the logic (at least for me).
It will make the following changes easier.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15125
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Now that we're using g_lock, it doesn't mean we're holding a tdb
chainlock.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15125
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
It will be used in close.c in the next commit.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15125
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Remember SMB2 Create is the only was to upgrade a lease.
The strategy is that opening of a file will always result
in storing the total lease bits.
But we're lazy clearing the flags on close.
We'll only clear them by traversing all entries when
we break a NONE or when opening a new handle.
We don't do any decision on SHARE_MODE_LEASE_{HANDLE,WRITE},
maybe we'll do in future, but at least it should be much more
sane for debugging now!
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15125
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This shows that the code in open_file_ntcreate() and
open_directory() is basically the same now, which
simplifies things a lot.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15125
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
It means we call open_mode_check() now only via handle_share_mode_lease()
and the fact that we never grant any directory leases (yet), means
that delay_for_oplocks() avoids the share_mode_forall_entries() loop.
This is a way into supporting directory leases, but that's not
the point for this commit, the point is that.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15125
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
We don't support directory leases yet, so it should be
an noop for now.
The point is that we want to call
delay_for_oplock(oplock_request=NO_OPLOCK)
for directories soon.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15125
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
The important part is the call to get a kernel oplock is deferred
until after set_share_mode(). The goal is to get the code
between get_share_mode_lock() and set_share_mode() free of any
blocking operation.
As we were optimistic to get the oplock that was asked for,
we need to remove_share_oplock() in order to set NO_OPLOCK
also in the share_mode entry.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15125
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This means we don't have to call remove_lease_if_stale() if
set_share_mode() fails. It's easier to cleanup the share mode entry.
And it makes the code flow easier to the following changes.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15125
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
The aim is to call set_file_oplock() after set_share_mode(), so that we
only ask for kernel oplocks after set_share_mode().
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15125
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
It means delay_for_oplocks() is no longer asking for kernel oplocks.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15125
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
We're already holding a share_mode_lock, so we can use it directly.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15125
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
share_mode_do_locked() will be make static soon.
Here we just want to avoid concurrent access to brlock.tdb
in order to maintain the lock order, we're not interested in the
locking.tdb content at all, expect that there's at least one
entry and we want to wake potential watchers.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15125
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
