IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
On open without create, the file did exist, but some
other (local or NFS) process either renamed/unlinked
and re-created the file with different dev/ino after
we walked the path, but before we did the open. We
could retry the open but it's a rare enough case it's
easier to just fail the open to prevent creating any
problems in the open file db having the wrong dev/ino
key.
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Jul 10 21:57:33 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
Move the inheritance work into the if block
where we created the file. We can never have
created the file (and thus need no inheritance)
for a stat-open.
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Jul 10 03:30:22 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
Move the fstat call into the block which opens a file descriptor.
Remove the stat() call in the stat-open case. We already failed
the open if !file_existed.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Jun 25 17:13:59 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
or should we leave the NetBSD and FreeBSD platforms just broken? Actually these
two *want* to have broken platforms as they use different errno's than POSIX
demands *interntionally*. The POSIX errno ELOOP for O_NOFOLLOW open calls on
symlinks is clear and unambiguous. See http://gnats.netbsd.org/43154 for the
interesting NetBSD discussion on that.
Autobuild-User(master): Björn Jacke <bj@sernet.de>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Jun 10 16:10:02 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
Pair-Programmed-With: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Jun 8 23:20:20 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
We can't manipulate file_attributes if it's a posix call. I'll look
at adding a test for this asap.
Autobuild-User: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Tue Jun 5 04:26:11 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
get_share_mode_lock_fresh is just a confusing name
Autobuild-User: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Sun Feb 19 19:16:41 CET 2012 on sn-devel-104
The second if-statement could never have kicked in, assuming the
SMB_ASSERT above was right.
Jeremy, please check!
Autobuild-User: Volker Lendecke <vlendec@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Tue Jan 31 20:15:36 CET 2012 on sn-devel-104
This slightly simplifies the code path for all callers which assume
that a share mode exists already. Only the callers in open_file_ntcreate
and open_directory will ever create new share modes.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
