IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
el->values is caller-provided memory that should be thought of as constant,
it should not be assumed to be a talloc context.
Otherwise, if the caller gives constant memory or a stack
pointer we will get an abort() in talloc when it expects
a talloc magic in the memory preceeding the el->values.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14258
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
I regularly get requests for my simple script to print the
password from the secrets.tdb (or secrets.ldb on the AD DC).
This removes the old script that only reads the secrets.ldb.
Neither new nor old script has tests, however it seems
better to have it in the tree where it can be found rather
that me digging it out of my outbound e-mail.
Originally posted here:
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2017-November/212362.html
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This improves commit bebee47e6386476e9948089484f89d213fcc2660 a bit
further.
I just got this:
connect samr pipe1
use assoc_group_id[0x00000001] for new connections
connect lsa pipe2
got assoc_group_id[0x00000001] for p2
samr_Connect to open a policy handle on samr p1
use policy handle on lsa p2 - should fail
closing policy handle on samr p1
connect samr pipe3 - should fail
Failed to bind to uuid 12345778-1234-abcd-ef00-0123456789ac for ncacn_np:localdc[\pipe\samr,validate,assoc_group_id=0x00000001,abstract_syntax=12345778-1234-abcd-ef00-0123456789ac/0x00000001] NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL
connect lsa pipe4 - should fail
Failed to bind to uuid 12345778-1234-abcd-ef00-0123456789ab for ncacn_np:localdc[\pipe\lsarpc,validate,assoc_group_id=0x00000001,abstract_syntax=12345778-1234-abcd-ef00-0123456789ab/0x00000000] NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL
connect samr pipe5 with assoc_group_id[0xFFFFFFFF]- should fail
Failed to bind to uuid 12345778-1234-abcd-ef00-0123456789ac for ncacn_np:localdc[\pipe\samr,validate,assoc_group_id=0xffffffff,abstract_syntax=12345778-1234-abcd-ef00-0123456789ac/0x00000001] NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL
connect lsa pipe6 with assoc_group_id[0x00000000]- should fail
UNEXPECTED(failure): samba4.rpc.handles on ncacn_np with validate.mixed-shared(ad_dc_ntvfs)
REASON: Exception: Exception: ../../source4/torture/rpc/handles.c:500: status was NT_STATUS_OK, expected NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL: opening lsa pipe6
FAILED (1 failures, 0 errors and 0 unexpected successes in 0 testsuites)
A summary with detailed information can be found in:
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Feb 5 10:13:02 UTC 2020 on sn-devel-184
The test is meant to be run as a user and not root.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14257
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Jan 30 16:54:33 UTC 2020 on sn-devel-184
The partial surrogate test is known to fail (in
both smb1 and smb2).
Signed-off-by: David Mulder <dmulder@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Noel Power <npower@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Jan 30 12:05:13 UTC 2020 on sn-devel-184
ldb_msg_add_empty reallocates the underlying element array, leaving
old_el pointing to freed memory.
This patch takes two defensive copies of the ldb message, and performs
the updates on them rather than the ldb messages in the result.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14050
Signed-off-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Autobuild-User(master): Karolin Seeger <kseeger@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Jan 21 11:38:38 UTC 2020 on sn-devel-184
We can not process on the basis of a DN, as the DN may have changed in a rename,
not only that this module can see, but also from repl_meta_data below.
Therefore remove all the complex tree-based change processing, leaving only
a tree-based sort of the possible objects to be changed, and a single
stopped_dn variable containing the DN to stop processing below (after
a no-op change).
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12497
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Previously if there was a conflict, but the incoming object would still
win, this was not marked as a rename, and so inheritence was not done.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12497
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We need to check the SD of the parent if we rename, it is not the same as an incoming SD change.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12497
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
While we have a seperate test (sec_descriptor.py) that confirms inheritance in
general we want to lock in these specific patterns as this test covers
rename.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
A simple write() might be interrupted or do short writes. Highly
unlikely, but if it happens, it will be impossible to diagnose.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
export FOO=bar is a Bash extension, and is not required in this case, we only need the asn1_compile
to run under the variable, there are no further commands in this sub-shell.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Isaac Boukris <iboukris@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Isaac Boukris <iboukris@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Jan 18 12:25:16 UTC 2020 on sn-devel-184
Signed-off-by: Björn Baumbach <bb@sernet.de>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Jan 15 13:30:53 UTC 2020 on sn-devel-184
The charset determination makes it more difficult to deal with the real
REG_MULTI_SZ nature of that element.
Guenther
Signed-off-by: Guenther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Jan 1 12:04:52 UTC 2020 on sn-devel-184
Samba 4.10 and later versions have a process restart capability to greatly
reduce the impact of crashes due to a NULL pointer de-reference or abort().
However SIGKILL was deliberatly omitted.
Sadly this is the most likely case, due to the OOM killer, as raised here:
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2019-November/134529.html
Subsequent discussion (offline) has been to agree that we should restart in
this case.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14221
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
