IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
"One of these locks is not like the others... One of these locks is not
quite the same" :-). When is a zero timeout lock not zero ? When it's
being processed by Windows 2000 of course.. This code change, ugly though
it is - completely fixes the foxpro/access multi-user file system database
problems that people have been having. I used a *wonderful* test program
donated by "Gerald Drouillard" <gerald@drouillard.ca> which allowed me
to completely reproduce this problem, and to finally determine the correct
fix. This also explains why Windows 2000 is *so slow* when responding to
the smbtorture lock tests. I *love* it when all these things come together
and finally make sense :-).
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 8aa9860ea2)
sharemode db in the following way.
Originally, on startup and shutdown, smbd would scan the share mode
db to ensure it was correct. This lead to scalability issues as
scans lock the db for quite a long time. Andrew had the brainstorm
that we only care about the record we're about to read.
This new code (small change really, but quite significant) causes
get_share_modes() to do a process_exists() call against each pid
in each record, and to delete any that don't and re-write the
entry if any dead records were detected.
This allowed me to remove the startup/shutdown scans of the
db (they can be added into smbstatus if anyone really cares to
have them back). This will please the vfs author who was worried
about the time taken on open() calls, and will lead to much
greater robustness and scalability in the share mode db.
We need much testing of this, and also netbench tests to
ensure the extra process_exists() calls don't hurt performance
(they shouldn't it's a very simple system call).
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 4098d44203)
was not forced to be 8 byte aligned. Use union to force it to be correctly aligned
for memcpy and use void *, to tell compiler not to optimize aligned copy (this last fix
suggested by Trond @ RedHat). The first fix should be sufficient, but this provides a
"belt and braces" fix.
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 22c5915bb4)
we set the DELETE_ON_CLOSE_FLAG on all share modes on the file, which
means the share mode in the fsp will not match the one in the tdb when
we come to close for other file handles, which means we end up with
share modes on files after all handles are closed
fixed by making the comparison function that says if two shares modes
are equal ignore the DELETE_ON_CLOSE_FLAG
(This used to be commit 7b39c4c598)
major changes include:
- added NSTATUS type
- added automatic mapping between dos and nt error codes
- changed all ERROR() calls to ERROR_DOS() and many to ERROR_NT()
these calls auto-translate to the client error code system
- got rid of the cached error code and the writebmpx code
We eventually will need to also:
- get rid of BOOL, so we don't lose error info
- replace all ERROR_DOS() calls with ERROR_NT() calls
but that is too much for one night
(This used to be commit 83d9896c1e)
link from Seattle is having problems.
I've added 3 things here to work on the fcntl spin
problem.
1). Check *all* tdb return codes... :-).
2). If we're asking ourselves to break an oplock, and we can't
find a fsp pointer that matches the entry, this is a *logic bug*
and we should abort and panic so someone with gdb can pick up
the pieces.
3). After we've broken an oplock, ensure that the entry itself
has been removed, and if not remove it ourselves. This should
not be neccessary in a correctly working environmen,t, but will
provide an added layer of robustness in error situations.
4). I hate german keyboards :-) :-).
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 1c94fa8064)
we're comparing structures (ie. don't just do a memcmp). I
don't think this will fix the fcntl spin issue, but it's a
"just in case" change.
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 41066208ad)
when copying to a full disk problem, I discovered that we were not allowing
the delete on close flag to be set properly, this led to other things, and
after investigation of the proper delete on close semantics and their relationship
to the file_share_delete flag I discovered there were some cases where we
weren't doing the deny modes properly. And this after only 5 years working
on them..... :-) :-).
So here's the latest attempt. I realised the delete on close flag needs to
be set across all smbds with a dev/ino pair open - in addition, the delete
on close flag, allow share delete and delete access requested all need to
be stored in the share mode tdb.
The "delete_on_close" entry in the fsp struct is now redundant and should
really be removed. This may also mean we can get rid of the "iterate_fsp"
calls that I didn't like adding in the first place. Whilst doing this patch,
I also discovered we needed to do the se_map_generic() call for file opens
and POSIX ACL mapping, so I added that also.
This code, although ugly, now passes the deny mode torture tests plus the
delete on close tests I added. I do need to add one more multiple connection
delete on close test to make sure I got the semantics exactly right, plus we
should also (as Andrew suggested) move to random testing here.
The good news is that NT should now correctly delete the file on disk
full error when copying to a disk :-).
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 51987684bd)
