IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Confirm that record overwrite with TDB_INSERT and record insert with
TDB_MODIFY both fail with appropriate error values.
Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Jun 10 20:28:45 UTC 2020 on sn-devel-184
Only Samba does the SMB1 posix extensions, and we do the "advanced"
trans-based call.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Fix the callers. Note the special casing of mapping (uint16)-1 -> (uint32_t)-1
in SMBC_setatr() where we can't change the ABI.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Cleanup. It's never been a UNIX mode, always a DOS attribute field.
Make that explicit.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
No change in behaviour. ucf_flags are just now checked *inside*
canonicalize_snapshot_path() instead of the caller.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Prepares for having canonicalize_snapshot_path() strip any @GMT token from link
targets. In the future VFS modules won't be doing @GMT token stripping, so we
have to do it here.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Most places take twrp from a local struct smb_filename variable that the
function is working on. Some don't for various reasons:
o synthetic_smb_fname_split() is only called in very few places where we don't
expect twrp paths
o implementations of SMB_VFS_GETWD(), SMB_VFS_FS_CAPABILITIES() and
SMB_VFS_REALPATH() return the systems view of cwd and realpath without twrp info
o VFS modules implementing previous-versions support (vfs_ceph_snapshots,
vfs_shadow_copy2, vfs_snapper) synthesize raw paths that are passed to VFS NEXT
functions and therefor do not use twrp
o vfs_fruit: macOS doesn't support VSS
o vfs_recycle: in recycle_create_dir() we need a raw OS path to create a directory
o vfs_virusfilter: a few places where we need raw OS paths
o vfs_xattr_tdb: needs a raw OS path for SMB_VFS_NEXT_STAT()
o printing and rpc server: don't support VSS
o vfs_default_durable_reconnect: no Durable Handles on VSS handles, this might
be enhances in the future. No idea if Windows supports this.
o get_real_filename_full_scan: hm.... FIXME??
o get_original_lcomp: working on a raw path
o msdfs: doesn't support VSS
o vfs_get_ntquota: synthesizes an smb_filename from ".", so doesn't support VSS
even though VFS modules implement it
o fd_open: conn_rootdir_fname is a raw path
o msg_file_was_renamed: obvious
o open_np_file: pipes don't support VSS
o Python bindings: get's a raw path from the caller
o set_conn_connectpath: raw path
o set_conn_connectpath: raw path
o torture: gets raw paths from the caller
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Create -o files per -N client connections, set a specific timestamp, then write
a bit. This leads to the locking.tdb dmasters to be spread across all nodes.
Then list from one node. This makes sure that the async share mode fetch works
right.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
canonicalize_absolute_path() has a bug.
In canonicalize_absolute_path()
///a/./././///component/../////path/ -> /a//path
It should go to /a/path. Mark as knownfail.
Adding these tests so I can ultimately remove
resolve_realpath_name() and re-use the existing
canonicalize_absolute_path() code in vfs_widelinks.c
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Shows bits needed to set/get a SACL. We need a script within Samba to run this
as it depends on a user with SeSecurityPrivilege to work.
Test does the following:
1). Create a test file.
2). Open with SEC_FLAG_SYSTEM_SECURITY *only*. ACCESS_DENIED.
NB. SMB2-only behavior. SMB1 allows this as tested in SMB1-SYSTEM-SECURITY.
3). Open with SEC_FLAG_SYSTEM_SECURITY|FILE_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES.
4). Write SACL. Should fail with ACCESS_DENIED (seems to need WRITE_DAC).
5). Close (3).
6). Open with SEC_FLAG_SYSTEM_SECURITY|SEC_STD_WRITE_DAC.
7). Write SACL. Success.
8). Close (4).
9). Open with SEC_FLAG_SYSTEM_SECURITY|READ_ATTRIBUTES.
10). Read SACL. Success.
11). Read DACL. Should fail with ACCESS_DENIED (no READ_CONTROL).
12). Close (9).
13 - and on error). Delete test file.
Passes against Windows 10.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
NB. This is also tested in samba3.base.createx_access
but this makes it very explicit what we're looking for.
Shows SMB1 allows explicit open of a file with only
he SEC_FLAG_SYSTEM_SECURITY access mask requested.
SMB2 doesn't.
Requires a Windows 10 system with a user with
SeSecurityPrivilege set. Passes against Windows 10
with SMB1 enabled.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Note that as ReadDirName() returns translated names (in Windows "encoding"), in
cmd_translate_name() test we have to translate back to UNIX "encoding" to check
if the filename matches the user requested path which is also in UNIX
"encoding".
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This walks different code paths in the subsequent locker. And the one
that we did not test so far is in fact buggy
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This can happen if we fail early and cli hasn't been initialized yet.
Found by covscan.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This implements two core changes:
* use NTTIME instead of struct timespec at the database layer
* use struct timespec { .tv_nsec = SAMBA_UTIME_OMIT } as special sentinel
value in smbd when processing timestamps
Using NTTIME at the database layer is only done to avoid storing the special
struct timespec sentinel values on disk. Instead, with NTTIME the sentinel value
for an "unset" timestamp is just 0 on-disk.
The NTTIME value of 0 gets translated by nt_time_to_full_timespec() to the
struct timespec sentinel value { .tv_nsec = SAMBA_UTIME_OMIT }.
The function is_omit_timespec() can be used to check this.
Beside nt_time_to_full_timespec(), there are various other new time conversion
functions with *full* in their name that can be used to safely convert between
different types with the changed sentinel value.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7771
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Nov 23 01:25:12 UTC 2019 on sn-devel-184
Now we have one fixed field for the exclusive lock holder and an array
of shared locks. This way we now prioritize writers over readers: If a
pending write comes in while readers are active, it will put itself
into the exclusive slot. Then it waits for the readers to vanish. Only
when all readers are gone the exclusive lock request is granted. New
readers will just look at the exclusive slot and see it's taken. They
will then line up as watchers, retrying whenever things change.
This also means that it will be cheaper to support many shared locks:
Granting a shared lock just means to extend the array. We don't have
to walk the array for possible conflicts.
This also adds explicit UPGRADE and DOWNGRADE operations for better
error checking.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
In the future, g_lock will not check for duplicate READ locks anymore,
as there might be many of them and the check might be expensive
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
