IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
case when I was developing the deferred open case and made it
too tight. It will fire (incorrectly) and panic when a client
does a second open for a file with a different mid (multiplex-id)
request. Doh ! This is a perfectly valid thing for a client to
do (have two pending opens with different mids outstanding on
the same file) and currently when the first pending open expires
with a share violation the paranoia code will panic smbd.
It's a rare condition, but obvious now I've looked at the
code.
Fix for bug #1743.
Jeremy.
* remove corrupt tdb and shutdown (only for printing tdbs, connections,
sessionid & locking)
* decrement smbd counter in connections.tdb in smb_panic()
* various Makefile hack to get things to link
'max smbd processes' looks like it might be broken. The counter KEY is not
being set. Will look into that tomorrow.
displaying pid_t, uid_t and gid_t values. This removes a whole lot of warnings
on some of the 64-bit build farm machines as well as help us out when 64-bit
uid/gid/pid values come along.
1. Finally work with cascaded modules with private data storage per module
2. Convert VFS API to macro calls to simplify cascading
3. Add quota support to VFS layer (prepare to NT quota support)
Patch by Stefan (metze) Metzemacher, with review of Jelmer and me
Tested in past few weeks. Documentation to new VFS API for third-party developers to follow
- use safe_strcpy() instead of pstrcpy() for malloc()ed strings
- CUPS: a failure in an attempt to automaticly add a printer is not level 0 stuff.
- Fix up a possible Realloc() failure segfault
Andrew Bartlett
"One of these locks is not like the others... One of these locks is not
quite the same" :-). When is a zero timeout lock not zero ? When it's
being processed by Windows 2000 of course.. This code change, ugly though
it is - completely fixes the foxpro/access multi-user file system database
problems that people have been having. I used a *wonderful* test program
donated by "Gerald Drouillard" <gerald@drouillard.ca> which allowed me
to completely reproduce this problem, and to finally determine the correct
fix. This also explains why Windows 2000 is *so slow* when responding to
the smbtorture lock tests. I *love* it when all these things come together
and finally make sense :-).
Jeremy.
sharemode db in the following way.
Originally, on startup and shutdown, smbd would scan the share mode
db to ensure it was correct. This lead to scalability issues as
scans lock the db for quite a long time. Andrew had the brainstorm
that we only care about the record we're about to read.
This new code (small change really, but quite significant) causes
get_share_modes() to do a process_exists() call against each pid
in each record, and to delete any that don't and re-write the
entry if any dead records were detected.
This allowed me to remove the startup/shutdown scans of the
db (they can be added into smbstatus if anyone really cares to
have them back). This will please the vfs author who was worried
about the time taken on open() calls, and will lead to much
greater robustness and scalability in the share mode db.
We need much testing of this, and also netbench tests to
ensure the extra process_exists() calls don't hurt performance
(they shouldn't it's a very simple system call).
Jeremy.
was not forced to be 8 byte aligned. Use union to force it to be correctly aligned
for memcpy and use void *, to tell compiler not to optimize aligned copy (this last fix
suggested by Trond @ RedHat). The first fix should be sufficient, but this provides a
"belt and braces" fix.
Jeremy.
