IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Since scavenging is implemented the samba_dnsupdate command always updates all
dns records required by the dc. This is not needed if dns zone scavenging
is not enabled.
This avoids the repeating TSIG error messages:
# samba_dnsupdate --option='dns zone scavenging = yes' 2>&1 | uniq -c
29 ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure
1 Failed update of 29 entries
# echo ${PIPESTATUS[0]}
29
# samba_dnsupdate --option='dns zone scavenging = no' 2>&1 | uniq -c
# echo ${PIPESTATUS[0]}
0
Note that this results in about 60 lines in the log file,
which triggered every 10 minutes ("dnsupdate:name interval=600" is the default).
This restores the behavior before 8ef42d4dab,
if "dns zone scavenging" is not switched on (which is still the default).
Avoiding the message from happening at all is subject for more debugging,
most likely they are caused by bugs in 'nsupdate -g' (from the bind package).
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13605
Pair-programmed-with: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Björn Baumbach <bb@sernet.de>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Björn Baumbach <bb@sernet.de>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Sep 12 18:03:10 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Sep 10 16:51:09 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Sep 5 21:56:11 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
This changes behaviour flagged as being for Java 1.6. My hope is that this does not
set f.canonicalize
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
The ability the kinit with an SPN (not also being a UPN) has gone away as
windows doesn't offer this functionality.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
The failures in this test compared with Windows Server 1709 are added to
knownfail.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
This reverts commit 20dc68050d.
Tests (the krb5.kdc testsuite) show this behaviour is incorrect.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
The krb5.kdc.canon testsuite has been updated to pass against Windows
Server 1709 in four modes:
* A normal user
* A user with a UPN
* A user with an SPN (machine account)
* A user with an SPN as the UPN
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Salt principal for the interdomain trust is krbtgt/DOMAIN@REALM where
DOMAIN is the sAMAccountName without the dollar sign ($)
The salt principal for the BLA$ user object was generated wrong.
dn: CN=bla.base,CN=System,DC=w4edom-l4,DC=base
securityIdentifier: S-1-5-21-4053568372-2049667917-3384589010
trustDirection: 3
trustPartner: bla.base
trustPosixOffset: -2147483648
trustType: 2
trustAttributes: 8
flatName: BLA
dn: CN=BLA$,CN=Users,DC=w4edom-l4,DC=base
userAccountControl: 2080
primaryGroupID: 513
objectSid: S-1-5-21-278041429-3399921908-1452754838-1597
accountExpires: 9223372036854775807
sAMAccountName: BLA$
sAMAccountType: 805306370
pwdLastSet: 131485652467995000
The salt stored by Windows in the package_PrimaryKerberosBlob
(within supplementalCredentials) seems to be
'W4EDOM-L4.BASEkrbtgtBLA' for the above trust
and Samba stores 'W4EDOM-L4.BASEBLA$'.
While the salt used when building the keys from
trustAuthOutgoing/trustAuthIncoming is
'W4EDOM-L4.BASEkrbtgtBLA.BASE', which we handle correct.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13539
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Bokovoy <ab@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Sep 5 03:57:22 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
This demonstrates the bug we currently have.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13539
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This makes sure we don't treat trusted domains in the same way we treat
our primary domain.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11517
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
These must be set correctly for each command in provision also.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Otherwise this relies on the order that tests run to cause the environment variable
to be left behind.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Otherwise this relies on the order that tests run to cause the environment variable
to be left behind.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
This avoids a race in durable handle reconnects if the reconnect comes
in while the old session is still in the tear-down phase.
The new session is supposed to rendezvous with and wait for destruction
of the old session, which is internally implemented with
dbwrap_watch_send() on the old session record.
If the old session deletes the session record before calling
file_close_user() which marks all file handles as disconnected, the
durable handle reconnect in the new session will fail as the records are
not yet marked as disconnected which is a prerequisite.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13549
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This might reduce issues with the first winbind-using test failing
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
The original fix for bug 13441 was missing a check that verifies that
fruit_ftruncate() is actually called on a stream.
Follow-up to
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13441
Pair-Programmed-With: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Aug 23 15:28:48 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
A user that doesn't have access to view an attribute can still guess the
attribute's value via repeated LDAP searches. This affects confidential
attributes, as well as ACLs applied to an object/attribute to deny
access.
Currently the code will hide objects if the attribute filter contains an
attribute they are not authorized to see. However, the code still
returns objects as results if confidential attribute is in the search
expression itself, but not in the attribute filter.
To fix this problem we have to check the access rights on the attributes
in the search-tree, as well as the attributes returned in the message.
Points of note:
- I've preserved the existing dirsync logic (the dirsync module code
suppresses the result as long as the replPropertyMetaData attribute is
removed). However, there doesn't appear to be any test that highlights
that this functionality is required for dirsync.
- To avoid this fix breaking the acl.py tests, we need to still permit
searches like 'objectClass=*', even though we don't have Read Property
access rights for the objectClass attribute. The logic that Windows
uses does not appear to be clearly documented, so I've made a best
guess that seems to mirror Windows behaviour.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13434
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Currently Samba is a bit disclosive with LDB_OP_PRESENT (i.e.
attribute=*) searches compared to Windows.
All the acl.py tests are based on objectClass=* searches, where Windows
will happily tell a user about objects they have List Contents rights,
but not Read Property rights for. However, if you change the attribute
being searched for, suddenly the objects are no longer visible on
Windows (whereas they are on Samba).
This is a problem, because Samba can tell you about which objects have
confidential attributes, which in itself could be disclosive.
This patch adds a acl.py test-case that highlights this behaviour. The
test passes against Windows but fails against Samba.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Adds tests that assert that a confidential attribute cannot be guessed
by an unprivileged user through wildcard DB searches.
The tests basically consist of a set of DB searches/assertions that
get run for:
- basic searches against a confidential attribute
- confidential attributes that get overridden by giving access to the
user via an ACE (run against a variety of ACEs)
- protecting a non-confidential attribute via an ACL that denies read-
access (run against a variety of ACEs)
- querying confidential attributes via the dirsync controls
These tests all pass when run against a Windows Dc and all fail against
a Samba DC.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13434
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
This fixes a regression that came in via 00db3aba6c.
Found by Vivek Das <vdas@redhat.com> (Red Hat QE).
In order to demonstrate simply run:
smbclient //server/share -U user%password -mNT1 -c quit \
--option="client ntlmv2 auth"=no \
--option="client use spnego"=no
against a server that uses "ntlm auth = ntlmv2-only" (our default
setting).
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13360
CVE-2018-1139: Weak authentication protocol allowed.
Guenther
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13360
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Previously the only test was to load these modules to trigger the
smb_vfs_assert_all_fns check. As these modules just pass through the
calls, they can be loaded for all tests to ensure that the codepaths are
exercised. This would have found the problem in
smb_time_audit_offload_read_recv.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13568
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Aug 13 22:35:20 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
This is a selftest target built from a restored offline backup.
Other backup routines are modified to remove the assumption that every backup
requires server and credentials arguments, since offline backup doesn't
want them. Also, prepare_dc_testenv now returns the generated ctx so we can
run or re-run routines that require it later.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Haslett <aaron.haslett@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Autobuild-User(master): Gary Lockyer <gary@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Aug 6 08:45:19 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
