IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
the ripple effects this causes. utmp has to change etc. Remove some
global varables and store address/port in the unexpected db.
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 18c6a2211d9e25233d01715b3f78977edcd6d869)
two places i found where it was appropriate to _use_ that third argument,
in locking.c and brlock.c! there was a static traverse_function and
i removed the static variable, typecast it to a void*, passed it to
tdb_traverse and re-cast it back to the traverse_function inside the
tdb_traverse function. this makes the use of tdb_traverse() reentrant,
which is never going to happen, i know, i just don't like to see
statics lying about when there's no need for them.
as i had to do in samba-tng, all uses of tdb_traverse modified to take
the new void* state argument.
2) disabled rpcclient: referring people to use SAMBA_TNG rpcclient.
i don't know how the other samba team members would react if i deleted
rpcclient from cvs main. damn, that code's so old, it's unreal.
20 rpcclient commands, instead of about 70 in SAMBA_TNG.
(This used to be commit 49d7f0afbc1c5425d53019e234d54ddf205c8e9a)
I also fixed up the lookup_pdc_name() code so that it now works, even
with a NT server that insists on replying to udp/138.
The method I used to match packets was to use the mailslot string as a
datagram ID. The true dgm_id doesn't work as NT doesn't set it
correctly. uggh.
PS: Jeremy, I had to change your code quite a bit, are you sure this
worked with a Samba PDC?? The code looked broken, it got the offsets
wrong in the SMB portion of the packet and filled in the IP
incorrectly.
(This used to be commit 32f66f4ea63038cb4b3785bdf1762abdde076f5d)
