IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15237
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This is the clearer way to trigger the destruction of this variable
and so the LDB connection under it.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
While the invalid escape sequence worked and was passed to the LDB
layer for it's use, linting tools will complain so we should not do
this. We don't want to get caught out when a future python version
becomes more strict.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This follows the same with 'attrs' in the previous commit.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This now local and static const list was otherwise a duplicate symbol
shadowing with the global user_attrs.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This helps explain these better than WERR_GEN_FAILURE.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15189
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Sep 16 06:47:43 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
leaving the carefully constructed verbosity there for whoever choses
to switch it on.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
It is strange that sDRightsEffective pays no attention to the
dSHeuristics flags.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Sep 16 03:31:42 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
The implicit right of an object's owner to modify its security
descriptor no longer exists, according to the new access rules. However,
we continue to grant this implicit right for fileserver access checks.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
Signed-off-by: Nadezhda Ivanova <nivanova@symas.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Test using non-priviledged accounts now need to make sure they have
WP access on the prvided attributes, or Write-DACL
Some test create organizational units with a specific SD, and those now
need the user to have WD or else they give errors
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
Signed-off-by: Nadezhda Ivanova <nivanova@symas.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Up to now, the rights to modify an attribute were not checked during an LDAP
add operation. This means that even if a user has no right to modify
an attribute, they can still specify any value during object creation,
and the validated writes were not checked.
This patch changes this behavior. During an add operation,
a security descriptor is created that does not include the one provided by the
user, and is used to verify that the user has the right to modify the supplied attributes.
Exception is made for an object's mandatory attributes, and if the user has Write DACL right,
further checks are skipped.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
Pair-Programmed-With: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Nadezhda Ivanova <nivanova@symas.com>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This allows us to make use of it in acl_add().
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Up to now, the rights to modify an attribute were not checked during an LDAP
add operation. This means that even if a user has no right to modify
an attribute, they can still specify any value during object creation,
and the validated writes were not checked.
This patch includes tests for the proposed change of behavior.
test_add_c3 and c4 pass, because mandatory attributes can still be
set, and in the old behavior SD permissions were irrelevant
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
Pair-Programmed-With: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Nadezhda Ivanova <nivanova@symas.com>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This helps reduce the profusion of magic constant values in Python
tests.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We want to be able to use these values in Python tests.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
These are the newly-added AttributeAuthorizationOnLDAPAdd and
BlockOwnerImplicitRights.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
The variable sub_sddl1 previously went unused, so this call to
modify_sd_on_dn() was presumably intended to go here.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
All of its callers, where necessary, take out a transaction covering the
entire password set or change operation, so a transaction is no longer
needed here.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We reread the account details inside the transaction in case the account
has been locked out in the meantime. If it has, we return the
appropriate error code.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Previously, there was a gap between calling dsdb_update_bad_pwd_count()
and dsdb_module_modify() where no transaction was in effect. Another
process could slip in and modify badPwdCount, only for our update to
immediately overwrite it. Doing the update inside the transaction will
help for the following commit when we make it atomic.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This is more specific than NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL, and for the SAMR
password change, matches the result the call to samdb_result_passwords()
would give.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
samdb_result_msds_LockoutObservationWindow() is split out of
samdb_result_effective_badPwdCount()
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611
Signed-off-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
If the message changes the sAMAccountName, we'll check dNSHostName and
servicePrincipalName values against the new value of sAMAccountName,
rather than the account's current value. Similarly, if the message
changes the dNSHostName, we'll check servicePrincipalName values against
the new dNSHostName. This allows setting more than one of these
attributes simultaneously with validated write rights.
We now pass 'struct ldb_val' to acl_validate_spn_value() instead of
simple strings. Previously, we were relying on the data inside 'struct
ldb_val' having a terminating zero byte, even though this is not
guaranteed.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14833
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
If we have an account without a trailing $, we should ensure the
servicePrincipalName matches the entire sAMAccountName. We should not
allow a match against the sAMAccountName prefix of length
strlen(samAccountName) - 1, as that could conflict with a different
account.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14833
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
When this control is specified, we'll assume we have Validated Write on
dNSHostName and servicePrincipalName, and Write Property on other
attributes.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14833
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Passing this control will grant the right to set validated values for
dNSHostName and servicePrincipalName, and non-validated values for other
attributes.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14833
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
We need to be able to determine whether an object is a subclass of a
specific objectclass such as 'computer'.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14833
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This function simulates an add or modify operation for an ldb message to
determine the final value of a particular single-valued attribute. This
is useful when validating attributes that should stay in sync with other
attributes, such as servicePrincipalName and dNSHostName.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14833
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
To use memcpy(), we need to specify the number of bytes to copy, rather
than the number of ldb_val structures.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15008
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Currently, we can crash the server by sending a large number of values
of a specific attribute (such as sAMAccountName) spread across a few
message elements. If val_count is larger than the total number of
elements, we get an access beyond the elements array.
Similarly, we can include unrelated message elements prior to the
message elements of the attribute in question, so that not all of the
attribute's values are copied into the returned elements values array.
This can cause the server to access uninitialised data, likely resulting
in a crash or unexpected behaviour.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15008
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
This aims to minimise usage of the error-prone pattern of searching for
a just-added message element in order to make modifications to it (and
potentially finding the wrong element).
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15009
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Using the newly added ldb flag, we can now detect when a message has
been shallow-copied so that its elements share their values with the
original message elements. Then when adding values to the copied
message, we now make a copy of the shared values array first.
This should prevent a use-after-free that occurred in LDB modules when
new values were added to a shallow copy of a message by calling
talloc_realloc() on the original values array, invalidating the 'values'
pointer in the original message element. The original values pointer can
later be used in the database audit logging module which logs database
requests, and potentially cause a crash.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15009
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
LDB_FLAG_MOD_* values are not actually flags, and the previous
comparison was equivalent to
(el->flags & LDB_FLAG_MOD_MASK) == 0
which is only true if none of the LDB_FLAG_MOD_* values are set, so we
would not successfully return if the element was a DELETE. Correct the
expression to what it was intended to be.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15009
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
