IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
We used %llu as conversion specifier which results in a decimal number
being printed, so remove the misleading "0x" prefix.
While at it, I'll change %llu to the terse %ju.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Oct 25 21:44:17 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
This has been implicitly initialized to 0 with the explicit struct
initializer above.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
In future this will an impersonation wrapper tevent_context based on the
user session.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
This will be used to mark basefile opens of streams opens. This is
needed to later implement a function that can determine if a file has
stream opens.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13451
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This is a behavior change, it will modify the POSIX ACL mask
from a value of rwx instead of modifying the existing ACE
entries to be ANDed with the passed in mode. However it
will have no effect on the underlying permissions, and
better reflects the proper use of POSIX ACLs (i.e. I
didn't understand the use of the mask entry in the
ACL when I first wrote the POSIX ACL code).
In addition, the vfs_acl_common.c module already
filters these calls for all but POSIX opens, which
means the only place this change is exposed to the
client would be a cifsfs unix extensions client doing
posix acl calls (and they would expect the mask to
be set like this on chmod).
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
We have potentially called SMB_VFS_FCHMOD() here in
the file_set_dosmode() call associated with the comment
/* Overwritten files should be initially set as archive */
at line 3755 above, so there is no need to do any POSIX ACL
mask protection.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Timur I. Bakeyev <timur@iXsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed May 16 21:29:24 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
This implements a check to test the delete-on-close flag of a directory
for requests to create files in this directory.
Windows server implement this check, Samba doesn't as it has performance
implications.
This commit implements the check and a new option to control it. By
default the check is skipped, setting "check parent directory delete on
close = yes" enables it.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Feb 3 23:42:16 CET 2018 on sn-devel-144
The initial idea was to have some "atomicity" in this API. Every
caller interested in a record would have to do something with
it once it changes. However, only one caller really used this
feature, and that is easily changed to not use it. So
remove the complexity.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
If a O_NONBLOCK open fails with EWOULDBLOCK, this code changes smbd to
do a retry open every second, until either the timeout or we get a successful
open. If we're opening a file that has a kernel lease set by a non-smbd
process, this is the best we can do.
Prior to this, smbd would block on the second open on such a leased file
(not using O_NONBLOCK) which freezes active clients.
Regression test to follow.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13121
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
This reverts commit b35a296a27.
This was the cause of
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13058
1. client of smbd-1 opens the file and sets the oplock.
2. client of smbd-2 tries to open the file. open() fails(EAGAIN) and open is deferred.
3. client of smbd-1 sends oplock break request to the client.
4. client of smbd-1 closes the file.
5. client of smbd-1 opens the file and sets the oplock.
6. client of smbd-2 calls defer_open_done(), sees that the file lease was not changed
and does not reschedule open.
and is no longer needed now vfs_streams_xattr.c no longer opens
the base file internally.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
If the caller passes O_DIRECTORY we just try to chdir() to smb_fname
directly, not to the parent directory.
The security check in check_reduced_name() will continue to work, but
this fixes the case of an open() for a previous version of a
subdirectory that contains snapshopt.
Eg:
[share]
path = /shares/test
vfs objects = shadow_copy2
shadow:snapdir = .snapshots
shadow:snapdirseverywhere = yes
Directory tree with fake snapshots:
$ tree -a /shares/test/
/shares/test/
├── dir
│ ├── file
│ └── .snapshots
│ └── @GMT-2017.07.04-04.30.12
│ └── file
├── dir2
│ └── file
├── file
├── .snapshots
│ └── @GMT-2001.01.01-00.00.00
│ ├── dir2
│ │ └── file
│ └── file
└── testfsctl.dat
./bin/smbclient -U slow%x //localhost/share -c 'ls @GMT-2017.07.04-04.30.12/dir/*'
NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND listing \@GMT-2017.07.04-04.30.12\dir\*
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12885
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Jul 1 07:20:28 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
The errno returned by open() is ambiguous when called with flags O_NOFOLLOW and
O_DIRECTORY on a symlink. With ELOOP, we know for certain that we've tried to
open a symlink. With ENOTDIR, we might have hit a symlink, and need to perform
further checks to be sure. Adjust non_widelink_open() accordingly. This fixes
a regression where symlinks to directories within the same share were no
longer followed for some call paths on systems returning ENOTDIR in the above
case.
Also remove the knownfail added in previous commit.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12860
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kobras <d.kobras@science-computing.de>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Requires a few extra cleanups in calling code.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Add an extra paramter to cwd_name to check_reduced_name().
If cwd_name == NULL then fname is a client given path relative
to the root path of the share.
If cwd_name != NULL then fname is a client given path relative
to cwd_name. cwd_name is relative to the root path of the share.
Not yet used, logic added in the next commit.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12721
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12496
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Uri Simchoni <uri@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Karolin Seeger <kseeger@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Mar 23 22:55:04 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
I noticed smbd can get stuck in an open() call with kernel oplocks
enabled and named streams (provided by vfs_streams_xattr):
- client opens a file and with an exclusive oplock
- client starts writing to the file
- client opens an existing stream of the file
- the smbd process gets stuck in an open()
What happens is:
we had setup a locking.tdb record watch in defer_open(), the watch was
triggered, we reattempted the open and got stuck in a blocking open
because the oplock holder (ourselves) hadn't given up the oplock yet.
Cf e576bf5310 for the commit that added
the kernel oplock retry logic. tldr: with kernel oplocks the first open
is non-blocking, but the second one is blocking.
Detailed analysis follows.
When opening a named stream of a file, Samba internally opens the
underlying "base" file first. This internal open of the basefile suceeds
and does *not* trigger an oplock break (because it is an internal open
that doesn't call open() at all) but it is added as an entry to the
locking.tdb record of the file.
Next, the stream open ends up in streams_xattr where a non-blocking
open() on the base file is called. This open fails with EWOULDBLOCK
because we have another fd with a kernel oplock on the file.
So we call defer_open() which sets up a watch on the locking.tdb record.
In the subsequent error unwinding code in open_file_ntcreate() and
callers we close the internal open file handle of the basefile which
also removes the entry from the locking.tdb record and so *changes the
record*.
This fires the record watch and in the callback defer_open_done() we
don't check whether the condition (oplock gone) we're interested in is
actually met. The callback blindly reschedules the open request with
schedule_deferred_open_message_smb().
schedule_deferred_open_message_smb() schedules an immediate tevent event
which has precedence over the IPC fd events in messaging, so the open is
always (!) reattempted before processing the oplock break message.
As explained above, this second open will be a blocking one so we get
stuck in a blocking open.
It doesn't help to make all opens non-blocking, that would just result
in a busy loop failing the open, as we never process the oplock break
message (remember, schedule_deferred_open_message_smb() used immediate
tevent events).
To fix this we must add some logic to the record watch callback to check
whether the record watch was done for a kernel oplock file and if yes,
check if the oplock state changed. If not, simply reschedule the
deferred open and keep waiting.
This logic is only needed for kernel oplocks, not for Samba-level
oplocks, because there's no risk of deadlocking, the worst that can
happen is a rescheduled open that fails again in the oplock checks and
gets deferred again.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7537
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
No change in behaviour. Update the function comment explaining how it
works and relies on lck for a record watch.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7537
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
schedule_async_open() was calling defer_open with sharemode lock = NULL,
as a result there was never an active 20 s timeout.
This has been broken since the commits in
$ git log --reverse -p -10 8283fd0e00
Just roll our own deferred record instead of calling defer_open() and
also set up timer that, as a last resort, catches stuck opens and just
exits for now.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7537
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Add a new function that does an immediate open rescheduling.
The first deferred open this commit changes was never scheduled, as the
scheduling relies on a timeout of the watch on the sharemode lock.
This has been broken since the commits in
$ git log --reverse -p -10 8283fd0e00
That patchset added the dbwrap watch record logic to defer_open() and
removed the timers.
I'm doing this mainly to untangle the defer_open() logic which is
complicated by the lck arg.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7537
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Add a helper function deferred_open_record_create() that creates a
deferred_open_record and let all callers pass all needed arguments
individually.
While we're at it, enhance the debug message in defer_open() to print
all variables.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7537
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
