IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This is a follow up to 69d61453df6019caef4e7960fa78c6a3c51f3d2a to
adjust the API to allow the lower layers allocate memory. Now the
memory can explicitly be freed rather than relying on talloc_tos().
Signed-off-by: Tim Prouty <tprouty@samba.org>
These were found interally via code inspection.
1) fake_sendfile was incorrectly writing zeros over real data on a
short read.
2) sendfile_short_send was doing 4 byte writes instead of 1024 byte
writes due to an incorrect sizeof usage.
Jermey, Vl please check
Inspired by lsa server from Samba 4.
Just removing a user in SAMR does not remove a user in LSA. If you use
usermanager from windows, the "User Rights" management gui gets unaccessable as
soon as you delete a user that had privileges granted. With this fix, that
no longer existing user would properly appear as an unknown account in the GUI
(as it does while using usermanager with windows domains).
This almost makes Samba3 pass the RPC-SAMR-USERS-PRIVILEGES test.
Guenther
The aio_fork module does not need this, as it does not communicate via signals
but with pipes. Watching a strace log with those become_root() calls in aio.c
is absolutely awful, and it does affect performance.
Jeremy as far as I can see there is no real technical reason to limit the
number of interfaces. If you like this patch, can you please merge it to 3.4?
If you don't please tell me :-)
Thanks,
Volker
Metze is right: If we have *any* error at the socket level, we just can
not continue.
Also, apply some defensive programming: With this async stuff someone else
might already have closed the socket.
This module didn't have any functionality that we actually used yet, and
it was quite small.
Tevent is quite low level and perhaps doesn't make much sense to expose
directly as a Python module. It was also causing build problems when used with a
system-tevent. We can always back later if necessary.
