IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Only use POSIX O_APPEND flag if the client requested FILE_APPEND_DATA without
FILE_WRITE_DATA.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15751
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
The index code (lib/ldb_key_value/ldb_kv_index.c) recapitulates LDB
expression logic, and it seemed less than completely obvious that it
would never make a mistake and return a different result than an
unindexed search.
Here we run the same search on an unindexed database and on some that
have been indexed with a variety of options. We assert that the
results are identical over a number of searches.
By default, when run from the command line, that number is 495161,
which takes a couple of minutes. But if the SKIP_SLOW_TESTS
environment variable is set, the number is 33569, which takes 20
seconds or so. In selftest we set the variable and run the smaller
number.
The tests will print the cumulative search time for each database for
each testsuite, like this:
$ python3 lib/ldb/tests/python/index_transparency.py
..........................................................[...]
<class '__main__.SearchTest'>
25.78186821937561 <ldb connection tdb:///tmp/tmpf1x72x7l/tdb-indexed-dn.ldb>
17.73349642753601 <ldb connection tdb:///tmp/tmpf1x72x7l/tdb-half-indexed.ldb>
15.14864206314087 <ldb connection tdb:///tmp/tmpf1x72x7l/tdb-indexed-guid.ldb>
13.107165575027466 <ldb connection mdb:///tmp/tmpf1x72x7l/mdb-indexed.ldb>
Like all benchmarks it is interesting but misleading. One caveat here
is that you have (probably) compiled tdb in developer mode without
optimisation, while lmdb is probably a system package compiled with -O2,
though perhaps not tuned to your exact architecture.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Maybe we could look also at other -X options and -v.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
While we have no sane reason to use
VALGRIND_PROVISION=1 GDB_PROVISION=1 make test...
we will soon gain PY_DEV_PROVISION, which could be useful in tandem
with valgrind, rr, or gdb, and this will allow that.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Dec 12 15:00:10 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
If schannel is not used we need to return ACCESS_DENIED and discard
the effect of netlogon_creds_server_step_check().
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Works against Windows 2025 preview:
SMB_CONF_PATH=/dev/null \
SERVER=172.31.9.115 DC_SERVER=w2025p-115.w2025p-l8.base \
DOMAIN="W2025P-L8" REALM="W2025P-L8.BASE" \
ADMIN_USERNAME="Administrator" ADMIN_PASSWORD="A1b2C3d4" \
NETLOGON_STRONG_KEY_SUPPORT=1 NETLOGON_AUTH_KRB5_SUPPORT=1 \
STRICT_CHECKING=0 python/samba/tests/krb5/netlogon.py
The code still works against Windows 2022 with the
following options:
SMB_CONF_PATH=/dev/null \
SERVER=172.31.9.118 DC_SERVER=w2022-118.w2022-l7.base \
DOMAIN="W2022-L7" REALM="W2022-L7.BASE" \
ADMIN_USERNAME="Administrator" ADMIN_PASSWORD="A1b2C3d4" \
NETLOGON_STRONG_KEY_SUPPORT=1 NETLOGON_AUTH_KRB5_SUPPORT=0 \
STRICT_CHECKING=0 python/samba/tests/krb5/netlogon.py
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
This shows that STRONG_KEY without ARCFOUR means no encryption
for ServerPasswordSet2.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Dec 5 17:46:49 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
This allows returning the POSIX type info from fsctl_get_reparse_point().
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Nov 27 19:32:45 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
This already fixes SMB2-GETINFO with POSIX infolevel to return the reparse tag
of reparse points.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Create a symlink reparse point over SMB2. Then query file info over SMB2 and
check the POSIX file type is correctly assigned in the POSIX info levels.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
This is needed for samba.tests.krb5.pkinit_tests with sha1.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
MS-SMB2 3.3.5.9.11 Handling the SMB2_CREATE_REQUEST_LEASE_V2 Create Context:
If the SMB2_LEASE_FLAG_PARENT_LEASE_KEY_SET bit is set in the Flags field of
the request, Lease.ParentLeaseKey MUST be set to the ParentLeaseKey of the
request.
Found by MS-SMB2-Prototocol-Testsuite test "Compare_Zero_LeaseFlag_ParentLeaseKey".
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
MS-SMB2 3.3.5.9.11 Handling the SMB2_CREATE_REQUEST_LEASE_V2 Create Context:
The server MUST attempt to locate a Lease by performing a lookup in the
LeaseTable.LeaseList using the LeaseKey ...
If no lease is found, one MUST be allocated with the following values set:
...
* Lease.Breaking is set to FALSE.
...
Ensures we ignore SMB2_LEASE_FLAG_BREAK_IN_PROGRESS. Found by
MS-SMB2-Prototocol-Testsuite "BreakReadLeaseV2TestCaseS0".
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Check for open files recursively when renaming a directory and wait for handle
lease breaks.
As delay_for_handle_lease_break_send() does the same check as
have_file_open_below(), remove have_file_open_below() from can_rename() so it is
not called twice for SMB2 renames, and add calls to have_file_open_below() to the
SMB1 entry rename entry points.
This is a bit ugly, but I don't see any other good way of doing this.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15608
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This ensures common cleanup code via
smbXsrv_connection_shutdown_send() ->
-> smbXsrv_session_disconnect_xconn()
-> smbXsrv_session_remove_channel()
-> smb2srv_session_shutdown_send()
is used if the last (only) connection goes away as well. In the future this
should be implemented for the
xconn->has_cluster_movable_ip
case.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15608
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
We must also break leases on other opens if the open of the rename doesn't have
a lease itself. The existing test test_lease_v2_rename() that was added
alongside the deferred rename server code didn't cover this case.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15697
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Oct 31 12:47:24 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
For a compound related request chain of eg CREATE+NOTIFY+GETINFO, the NOTIFY
will typically go async. When this is noted in smbd_smb2_request_pending_queue()
the pending async tevent_req is cancelled which means we return
NT_STATUS_CANCELLED to the client while Windows returns
NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15697
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
All tests pass against Windows 2022, we have some bugs.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15697
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15732
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Oct 14 12:23:04 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14356
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Oct 10 15:17:46 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
I know finding any real logic in reading the patch,
doesn't really show what's going on. I tried hard
to simplify it, but this is the only way I found
that fixed the test_auth_pad_ntlm_2889_auth3 test
without breaking other tests...
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14356
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
