IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
place to do this, not in smbd/passwd.c
Please don't change this without asking first, I have run this past
Andrew so talk to him (I'm on vacation next week).
I also removed the g_newXXX macros. There are essentially a private C extension,
not used anywhere else in the code, and add no functionality over malloc(XX)
and make the code harder to understand (everyone knows what malloc does).
Jeremy.
jeremy, the intent is to call se_access_check() with usr-sid, grp-sid,
array-of-group-rids (but array-of-group-sids would do).
please do look at smbd/lanman.c's api_NetWkstaGetInfo, it will show you
that we really do need to store the entire NET_USER_INFO_3 structure.
then again, api_NetWkstaGetInfo is only used by win9x so who cares :)
#ifdef'd driver-code out with define RELIES_ON_SMBD_SPECIFIC_CODE because
spoolssd doesn't link with smbd/*.c (find_service("print$") is not
possible).
Problem in prs_set_buffer_size() was Realloc returns a NULL when newsize is zero (equivalent to a free()). We were returning a failure here without resetting the buffer_size or the data_p pointer in the prs_struct. And we weren't checking for a failure from prs_set_buffer_size(). So realloc's to zero size were not reflected in the prs_struct: memory leak.
thsi function and the associated header structure were autogenerated
using a little awk based code geerator I wroe ths evening. I'll commit
that next ...
head/tng merge.
It goes something like this:
- headers from tng get copied over one at a time
- the old headers get renamed to *_old.h
- server side code that used the old headers gets a
#define OLD_NTDOMAIN 1
#undef OLD_NTDOMAIN
at the start and end of the code
- mkproto.awk recognises these special defines and does magic stuff so
that each .c file sees the right headers
- we start moving the rpc client libraries from tng to head.
if this goes OK then, in theory, we should be able to move the client
side rpc code from tng to head without disturbing the existing head
server side code. Then when that works we can consider merging the
server side.
it remains to be seen if this scheme will work. So far I've moved
rpc_samr.h and don't seem to have broken anything.
Note this this is still a very delicate operation, as at every step of
the way I want to keep head fully functional. Please don't take part
unless you discuss it with me first.
wrong in the spoolss case.
fxed a bug in the job notify code (that's the polite answer), the truth is
different: there is a bug in the NT spooler service, including SP6a and
NT2K.
changed the default lpcommand in the LPRNG case.
J.F.
include/byteorder.h: Added alignment macros.
include/nameserv.h: Added defines for msg_type field options - from rfc1002.
lib/time.c: Typo fix.
lib/util_unistr.c: Updates from UNICODE branch.
printing/nt_printing.c: bzero -> memset.
smbd/connection.c: Added check for UT_SYSLEN for utmp code.
Other fixes : Rollback of unapproved commit from Luke.
Please *ask* next time before doing large changes to HEAD.
Jeremy.
the spoolss code (it's cut from TNG) and the smb-dce/rpc interface
code that jeremy has been working up to TNG-functionality.
i also want this message to go into SAMBA_2_0 and SAMBA_2_0_RELEASE,
because it is intolerable that potentially good modifications be made
to code that is going to be thrown away, and people waste their time
fixing bugs and adding enhancements that have already been carried
out already, up to two years ago in the TNG branch.
/*
* THIS CODE IS OUT-OF-DATE BY TWO YEARS, IS LEGACY DESIGN AND VERY, VERY,
* INCOMPLETE. PLEASE DO NOT MAKE ANY FURTHER ENHANCEMENTS TO THIS CODE
* UNLESS THEY ARE ALSO CARRIED OUT IN THE SAMBA_TNG BRANCH.
*
* PLEASE DO NOT TREAT THIS CODE AS AUTHORITATIVE IN *ANY* WAY.
*
* REPEAT, PLEASE DO NOT MAKE ANY MODIFICATIONS TO THIS CODE WITHOUT
* FIRST CHECKING THE EQUIVALENT MODULE IN SAMBA_TNG, UPDATING THAT
* FIRST, *THEN* CONSIDER MAKING THE SAME MODIFICATION IN THIS BRANCH
*
* YOU WILL, ALMOST GUARANTEED, FIND THAT THE BUG-FIX OR ENHANCEMENT THAT
* YOU THINK IS NECESSARY, HAS ALREADY BEEN IMPLEMENTED IN SAMBA_TNG.
* IF IT HAS NOT, YOUR BUG-FIX OR ENHANCEMENT *MUST* GO INTO SAMBA_TNG
* AS THE SAMBA_TNG CODE WILL REPLACE THIS MODULE WITHOUT REFERENCE TO
* ANYTHING IN IT, WITH THE POSSIBLE RISK THAT THE BUG-FIX OR ENHANCEMENT
* MAY BE LOST.
*
* PLEASE OBSERVE AND RESPECT THIS SIMPLE REQUEST.
*
* THANK YOU.
*
* lkcl@samba.org
*/
