IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
If you happen to talloc_free(run_ctx) before all the tevent_req's
hanging off it, you run into the following:
==495196== Invalid read of size 8
==495196== at 0x10D757: run_proc_state_destructor (run_proc.c:413)
==495196== by 0x488F736: _tc_free_internal (talloc.c:1158)
==495196== by 0x488FBDD: _talloc_free_internal (talloc.c:1248)
==495196== by 0x4890F41: _talloc_free (talloc.c:1792)
==495196== by 0x48538B1: tevent_req_received (tevent_req.c:293)
==495196== by 0x4853429: tevent_req_destructor (tevent_req.c:129)
==495196== by 0x488F736: _tc_free_internal (talloc.c:1158)
==495196== by 0x4890AF6: _tc_free_children_internal (talloc.c:1669)
==495196== by 0x488F967: _tc_free_internal (talloc.c:1184)
==495196== by 0x488FBDD: _talloc_free_internal (talloc.c:1248)
==495196== by 0x4890F41: _talloc_free (talloc.c:1792)
==495196== by 0x10DE62: main (run_proc_test.c:86)
==495196== Address 0x55b77f8 is 152 bytes inside a block of size 160 free'd
==495196== at 0x48399AB: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:538)
==495196== by 0x488FB25: _tc_free_internal (talloc.c:1222)
==495196== by 0x488FBDD: _talloc_free_internal (talloc.c:1248)
==495196== by 0x4890F41: _talloc_free (talloc.c:1792)
==495196== by 0x10D315: run_proc_context_destructor (run_proc.c:329)
==495196== by 0x488F736: _tc_free_internal (talloc.c:1158)
==495196== by 0x488FBDD: _talloc_free_internal (talloc.c:1248)
==495196== by 0x4890F41: _talloc_free (talloc.c:1792)
==495196== by 0x10DE62: main (run_proc_test.c:86)
==495196== Block was alloc'd at
==495196== at 0x483877F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==495196== by 0x488EAD9: __talloc_with_prefix (talloc.c:783)
==495196== by 0x488EC73: __talloc (talloc.c:825)
==495196== by 0x488F0FC: _talloc_named_const (talloc.c:982)
==495196== by 0x48925B1: _talloc_zero (talloc.c:2421)
==495196== by 0x10C8F2: proc_new (run_proc.c:61)
==495196== by 0x10D4C9: run_proc_send (run_proc.c:381)
==495196== by 0x10DDF6: main (run_proc_test.c:79)
This happens because run_proc_context_destructor() directly does a
talloc_free() on the struct proc_context's and not the enclosing
tevent_req's. run_proc_kill() makes sure that we don't follow
proc->req, but it forgets the "state->proc", which is free()'ed, but
later dereferenced in run_proc_state_destructor().
This is an attempt at a quick fix, I believe we should convert
run_proc_context->plist into an array of tevent_req's, so that we can
properly TALLOC_FREE() according to the "natural" hierarchy and not
just pull an arbitrary thread out of that heap.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Oct 6 15:10:20 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
If a script times out the caller can talloc_free() the script_list
output of run_event_recv, which talloc_free's proc->output from
run_proc.c as well. If the script generates further output after the
timeout and then exits after a while, the SIGCHLD handler in the
eventd tries to read into proc->output, which was already free'ed.
Fix this by not doing just a talloc_steal but a talloc_move. This way
proc_read_handler() called from run_proc_signal_handler() does not try
to realloc the stale reference to proc->output but gets a NULL
reference.
I don't really know how to do a knownfail in ctdb, so this commit
actually activates catching the signal by waiting long enough for
22.bar to exit and generate the SIGCHLD.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14475
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13895
In run_proc, there was an implicit assumption that when a process exits,
fd event (pipe between parent and child) would be processed first and
signal event (SIGCHLD for the child) would be processed later.
However, that is not the case. SIGCHLD can be received asynchronously
any time even when the pipe data has not fully been read. This causes
run_proc to miss some of the output from child process in tests.
When SIGCHLD is being processed, if the pipe between parent and child is
still open, then do an explict read from the pipe to ensure we read any
data still in the pipe before closing the pipe.
Signed-off-by: Amitay Isaacs <amitay@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Autobuild-User(master): Amitay Isaacs <amitay@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Apr 12 08:19:29 UTC 2019 on sn-devel-144
The way run_proc abstraction is used in run_event, there can be maximum
of 2 processes active at any given time. So the memory requirements
can be reduced by using a linked list.
New eventd will have multiple run_event instances but will be limited to
3 or 4. Even then the total number of processes will be less than 10.
Signed-off-by: Amitay Isaacs <amitay@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
This allows to pass data to a child process via stdin.
Signed-off-by: Amitay Isaacs <amitay@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
