IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
- open session1 on tcp connection conn1
- open a durable handle on a session1
- do a session reconnect on a new tcp connection conn2
- doing a durable reconnect on session1 gives
USER_SESSION_DELETED
- doing a durable reconnect on session2 succeeds
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Dec 6 15:59:15 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
- open session1 on tcp connection conn1
- open a durable handle on a session1
- do a session reconnect on a new tcp connection conn2
- doing a durable reconnect on session1 gives
USER_SESSION_DELETED
- doing a durable reconnect on session2 succeeds
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
test_fsrvp_bad_id() issues DeleteShareMapping requests with invalid
shadow copy IDs, expect Windows Server 2012 return codes.
Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
MS-FSRVP 3.1.4.4 documents the requirement for failure when duplicate
volume names are encountered on AddToShadowCopySet.
Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Not fetching the latest modification time on a folder if we have read locks on it.
Prove we should just rely on the mtime value from the underlying
filesystem, even with an open handle.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9870
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Dec 5 10:05:06 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
Issue an SMB2 ENUM_SNAPSHOTS ioctl following FSRVP snapshot creation to
cover Explorer previous file version use-cases.
This test will fail against Windows Server 2012, as FSRVP created
snapshots are not exposed via the ENUM_SNAPSHOTS ioctl.
Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Windows Server 2012[r2] exhibits some strange behaviour with regard
to handling the compression fsctls.
[READ/WRITE]_ATTR permissions are not required for the corresponding
get/set compression ioctls. WRITE_DATA is required for set compression.
Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Nov 22 19:57:48 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
Doing so should give a successful SetInfo response, however the
attribute should not be set in subsequent GetInfo / ioctl responses.
Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Also add a note reguarding Windows 2008GM copy-chunk note:
Windows 2008GM (non-R2) fails the copy-chunk src=dest overlap test, as
it appears to use a different chunk copy algorithm to 208R2.
Takeaway advice is to avoid using copy-chunk when the source and
destination ranges overlap in the same file.
Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
The "XPS_PASS" datatype is used by Windows 8.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10267
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Nov 21 15:01:30 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
NTTIME has a nanosecond resolution. We should be tolerate if the system
is busy writing and reading the value. To reproduce this problem just
run the test under valgrind.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Nadezhda Ivanova <nivanova@symas.com>
se enter the commit message for your changes. Lines starting
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Nov 12 00:57:19 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
This patch moves the udp netlogon tests from cldap.c
to netlogon.c and passes a generic netlogon-send
function as parameter.
Therefore a tcp replacement for cldap_netlogon is also added.
The two variants tcp and udp are added as 2 new torture tests:
ldap.netlogon-udp & ldap.netlogon-tcp
Both tests succeed.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Nadezhda Ivanova <nivanova@symas.com>
Test what upgrades work when there is another lease already held,
in addition to the lease to be upgraded.
The summary of the behaviour is this:
-------------------------------------
If we have two leases (lease1 and lease2) on the same file,
then attempt to upgrade lease1 results in a change if and only
if the requested lease state:
- is valid,
- is strictly a superset of lease1, and
- can held together with lease2.
In that case, the resuling lease state of the upgraded lease1
is the state requested in the upgrade. lease2 is not broken
and remains unchanged.
Note that this contrasts the case of directly opening with
an initial requested lease state, in which case you get that
portion of the requested state that can be shared with the
already existing leases (or the states that they get broken to).
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Nov 11 18:04:47 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
The summary of the behaviour is this:
-------------------------------------
An uncontended lease upgrade results in a change
if and only if the requested lease state is
- valid, and
- strictly a superset of the lease state already held.
In that case the resulting lease state is the one
requested in the upgrade.
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Checks against a file with attribute READONLY, and
a security descriptor denying WRITE_DATA access.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Nov 4 23:10:10 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
This is a little benchmark test excercising parallel directory renames. With
lots of open files directory renames get pretty slow against some SMB server
implementations.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Check that FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK_WRITE succeeds when the copy-chunk target
is opened with SEC_RIGHTS_FILE_WRITE only.
Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Oct 25 22:48:59 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Oct 24 16:15:50 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
smbd broke to none twice. Make sure this won't happen again :-)
This used to happen before the MSG_SMB_BREAK_RESPONSE merge. In
process_oplock_break_message we did not call remove_oplock, which would
have prevented this.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Oct 23 14:06:13 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
The level we have to break to depends on the create disposition of the
second opener. If it's overwriting, break to none. If it's not, break
to level2.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This is what Windows does in this case, we don't survive that. We break
to LEVEL2 here. Fixes and more precise test to follow.
We don't survive this anymore. Re-enable later.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
We can directly use smb_raw_open() to open a handle to a named pipe.
This avoids the need for the layer violation functions
dcerpc_smb_tree() and dcerpc_smb_fnum().
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We now use smbXcli_conn_is_connected() and
dcerpc_binding_handle_is_connected() to verify only the dcerpc layer
got an error. The expected error is EIO mapped to NT_STATUS_IO_DEVICE_ERROR.
NT_STATUS_INVALID_HANDLE should only be visible at the SMB layer,
but we keep this as allowed return value for now, until
the dcerpc layer is fixed.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Some code uses the low level smbXcli_session structure instead of
the smbcli_session structure and doesn't 'see' updates to the
smbcli_session structure.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This attempts reauth with invalid creds, hence
triggering the error path in the reauth code.
This invalidates the session and subsequente requests
on that connection fail.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10208
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Oct 15 22:50:27 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
With FAKE_LEVEL_II_OPLOCKS around we did not grant LEVEL2 after
a NO_OPLOCK file got written to. Windows does grant LEVEL2 in this
case. With the have_level2_oplocks in brlocks.tdb we can now grant LEVEL2
in this case as well.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
If delete_on_close is set, there is no oplock break. Check that.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
If delete_on_close is set, there is no oplock break. Check that.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Patch from the SDC plugfest. Not every implementation supports every
infolevel, and we want to be able to test buffersize error behaviour
for all supported infolevels
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
