IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
include/byteorder.h: Added alignment macros.
include/nameserv.h: Added defines for msg_type field options - from rfc1002.
lib/time.c: Typo fix.
lib/util_unistr.c: Updates from UNICODE branch.
printing/nt_printing.c: bzero -> memset.
smbd/connection.c: Added check for UT_SYSLEN for utmp code.
Other fixes : Rollback of unapproved commit from Luke.
Please *ask* next time before doing large changes to HEAD.
Jeremy.
the spoolss code (it's cut from TNG) and the smb-dce/rpc interface
code that jeremy has been working up to TNG-functionality.
i also want this message to go into SAMBA_2_0 and SAMBA_2_0_RELEASE,
because it is intolerable that potentially good modifications be made
to code that is going to be thrown away, and people waste their time
fixing bugs and adding enhancements that have already been carried
out already, up to two years ago in the TNG branch.
/*
* THIS CODE IS OUT-OF-DATE BY TWO YEARS, IS LEGACY DESIGN AND VERY, VERY,
* INCOMPLETE. PLEASE DO NOT MAKE ANY FURTHER ENHANCEMENTS TO THIS CODE
* UNLESS THEY ARE ALSO CARRIED OUT IN THE SAMBA_TNG BRANCH.
*
* PLEASE DO NOT TREAT THIS CODE AS AUTHORITATIVE IN *ANY* WAY.
*
* REPEAT, PLEASE DO NOT MAKE ANY MODIFICATIONS TO THIS CODE WITHOUT
* FIRST CHECKING THE EQUIVALENT MODULE IN SAMBA_TNG, UPDATING THAT
* FIRST, *THEN* CONSIDER MAKING THE SAME MODIFICATION IN THIS BRANCH
*
* YOU WILL, ALMOST GUARANTEED, FIND THAT THE BUG-FIX OR ENHANCEMENT THAT
* YOU THINK IS NECESSARY, HAS ALREADY BEEN IMPLEMENTED IN SAMBA_TNG.
* IF IT HAS NOT, YOUR BUG-FIX OR ENHANCEMENT *MUST* GO INTO SAMBA_TNG
* AS THE SAMBA_TNG CODE WILL REPLACE THIS MODULE WITHOUT REFERENCE TO
* ANYTHING IN IT, WITH THE POSSIBLE RISK THAT THE BUG-FIX OR ENHANCEMENT
* MAY BE LOST.
*
* PLEASE OBSERVE AND RESPECT THIS SIMPLE REQUEST.
*
* THANK YOU.
*
* lkcl@samba.org
*/
the whole task is not complete, yet. xxx_io_xxx() routines that
_call_ xxx_io_xxx() routines not done.
prs_xxxx() covered by macros. considering doing xxx_io_xxxx in the same way.
prompted by the interpret_security() dead code that Jean-Francois
pointed out I added a make target "finddead" that finds potentially
dead (ie. unused) code. It spat out 304 function names ...
I went through these are deleted many of them, making others static
(finddead also reports functions that are used only in the local
file).
in doing this I have almost certainly deleted some useful code. I may
have even prevented compilation with some compile options. I
apologise. I decided it was better to get rid of this code now and add
back the one or two functions that are needed than to keep all this
baggage.
So, if I have done a bit too much "destroying" then let me know. Keep
the swearing to a minimum :)
One bit I didn't do is the ubibt code. Chris, can you look at that?
Heaps of unused functions there. Can they be made static?
all I saw" - the book of Jeremy, chapter 1 :-).
So here is the mega-merge of the NTDOM branch server code.
It doesn't include the new client side pieces, we'll look
at that later.
This should give the same functionality, server wise, as
the NTDOM branch does, only merged into the main branch.
Any fixes to domain controler functionality should be
added to the main branch, not the NTDOM branch.
This code compiles without warnings on gcc2.8, but will
need further testing before we are sure all the working
functionality of the NTDOM server branch has been
correctly carried over.
I hereby declare the server side of the NTDOM branch
dead (and all who sail in her :-).
Jeremy.
