IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
All other fragments blindly inherit it.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14875
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Cabrero <scabrero@samba.org>
This means yet another library, but having to depend on gensec just
for dcerpc_parse_binding() and basic packet parsing seems like a bit
overkill to me.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Apr 6 23:33:14 UTC 2021 on sn-devel-184
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14875
(cherry picked from commit 4d3b6506d30e4bf302f832493dad00a83b73d370)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14564
If one of the objectClass checks passed, samldb_add() could return
through one of the samldb_fill_*() functions and skip the
servicePrincipalName uniqueness checking.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
This is tested in other places already, but this ensures a global
check that a TGS-REP has a PAC, regardless.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14561
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
This reverts an earlier commit that was incorrect.
It is not Samba practice to include a revert, but at this point in
the patch preperation the ripple though the knownfail files is
more trouble than can be justified.
It is not correct to refuse to parse all tickets with no authorization
data, only for the KDC to require that a PAC is found, which is done
in "heimdal:kdc: Require PAC to be present"
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
This allows us to use it when validating user-to-user.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14873
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
If the structural objectclass is allowed to change, then the restrictions
locking an object to remaining a user or computer will not be enforcable.
Likewise other LDAP inheritance rules, which allow only certain
child objects can be bypassed, which can in turn allow creation of
(unprivileged) users where only DNS objects were expected.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14753
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14889
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Looking up the DB twice is subject to a race and is a poor
use of resources, so instead just pass in the record we
already got when trying to confirm that the server in
S4U2Self is the same as the requesting client.
The client record has already been bound to the the
original client by the SID check in the PAC.
Likewise by looking up server only once we ensure
that the keys looked up originally are in the record
we confirm the SID for here.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14686
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
These common routines will assist the KDC to do the same access
checking as the RPC servers need to do regarding which accounts
a RODC can act with regard to.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14558
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
These are added for the uncommon cases.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14558
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
In particular the objectGUID is no longer used, and in the NETLOGON case
the special case for msDS-KrbTgtLink does not apply.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14558
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
This shares the lookup of the tokenGroups attribute.
There will be a new caller that does not want to do this step,
so this is a wrapper of samdb_confirm_rodc_allowed_to_repl_to_sid_list()
rather than part of it
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14558
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
While these checks were not in the NETLOGON case, there is no sense where
an RODC should be resetting a bad password count on either a
UF_INTERDOMAIN_TRUST_ACCOUNT nor a RODC krbtgt account.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14558
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
This will allow the creation of a common helper routine that
takes the token SID list (from tokenGroups or struct auth_user_info_dc)
and returns the allowed/denied result.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14558
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
This is instead of an array of struct dom_sid *.
The reason is that auth_user_info_dc has an array of struct dom_sid
(the user token) and for checking if an RODC should be allowed
to print a particular ticket, we want to reuse that a rather
then reconstruct it via tokenGroups.
This also avoids a lot of memory allocation.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14558
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
This does the same check as the hdb plugin now. The client check is already
done earlier.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14561
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Nobody uses it now. It never really did what it said it did. Almost
every use was wrong. It was a trap.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14876
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This tightens the logic a bit, in that a message with trailing DELETE
elements is no longer accepted when the bypass flag is set. In any case
this is an unlikely scenario as this is an internal flag set by a private
control in pdb_samba_dsdb_replace_by_sam().
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14876
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
