IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
link from Seattle is having problems.
I've added 3 things here to work on the fcntl spin
problem.
1). Check *all* tdb return codes... :-).
2). If we're asking ourselves to break an oplock, and we can't
find a fsp pointer that matches the entry, this is a *logic bug*
and we should abort and panic so someone with gdb can pick up
the pieces.
3). After we've broken an oplock, ensure that the entry itself
has been removed, and if not remove it ourselves. This should
not be neccessary in a correctly working environmen,t, but will
provide an added layer of robustness in error situations.
4). I hate german keyboards :-) :-).
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 1c94fa80646f9e31377fbb41332fe4780f550cab)
in particular:
- fixed NT status code for a bunch of ops
- fixed handling of protocol levels in ms_fnmatch
(This used to be commit 3eba9606f71f90bfd9820af26f8676277ed22390)
smbd/password.c: We don't use globals here anymore
smbd/reply.c: Tidyness, global_myworkgroup must die!
smbd/service.c: Move some of the make_connection code into a helper
function.
(This used to be commit 15c87e404fcaff9e360a40b8b673938c6e611daf)
Style, doco and DEBUG() fixes for auth_smbpasswd.c
(In particular for the account control call).
Andrew Bartlett
(This used to be commit 3d91c119420973d7dd1af416a1e26efa113dc626)
many possible mem leaks, and segfaults fixed.
someone should port this fix to 2.2 also.
(This used to be commit fa8e55b8b465114ce209344965c1ca0333b84db9)
In particuar, it moves the domain_client_validate stuff out of
auth_domain.c to somwhere where they (I hope) they can be shared
with winbind better. (This may need some work)
The main purpose of this patch was however to improve some of the
internal documentation and to correctly place become_root()/unbecome_root()
calls within the code.
Finally this patch moves some more of auth.c into other files, auth_unix.c
in this case.
Andrew Bartlett
(This used to be commit ea1c547ac880def29f150de2172c95213509350e)
which I will confirm once I can find a box it would break on in the first place.
(this is the pam accounts as nobody thing we had with 2.2.0)
Andrew Bartlett
(This used to be commit 9746ad12bd2d310e5c255c7ea491b87170b807af)
samba-technical a few weeks ago.
The idea here is to standardize the checking of user names and passwords,
thereby ensuring that all authtentications pass the same standards. The
interface currently implemented in as
nt_status = check_password(user_info, server_info)
where user_info contains (mostly) the authentication data, and server_info
contains things like the user-id they got, and their resolved user name.
The current ugliness with the way the structures are created will be killed
the next revision, when they will be created and malloced by creator functions.
This patch also includes the first implementation of NTLMv2 in HEAD, but which
needs some more testing. We also add a hack to allow plaintext passwords to be
compared with smbpasswd, not the system password database.
Finally, this patch probably reintroduces the PAM accounts bug we had in
2.2.0, I'll fix that once this hits the tree. (I've just finished testing
it on a wide variety of platforms, so I want to get this patch in).
(This used to be commit b30b6202f31d339b48d51c0d38174cafd1cfcd42)
break code path that was invalid (ie. we were assuming
we could infer a non-levelII oplock when such an oplock
was detected - this may no longer be valid once we've
processed the break process dealing with the break will
change the state of it anyway.
This prevents the state where we get the following packet
trace :
client server
NTcreate ->
<- NTcreate resp
NTcreate ->
<- break to level II
ok - broken ->
<- break to none
Thanks to Alan Romeril for providing the trace that allowed
me to track this down.
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit c343e4f49070011986fc2ed4acd4ce690d5f1d71)
on username we already know are perfectly valid, and in their final form. In
particular we don't want to do a lookup for DOMAIN\nobody, it just does not
make sense, nor should we do map_username and the like if the username is as
specified in the vuid - we have done it already.
Andrew Bartlett
(This used to be commit 7cb517329b0fa2dec427a890a985c75cd467a3b0)