IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Calling tdb_traverse inside a transaction led to the transaction lock being
held indefinitely. This was caused by the tdb_transaction_lock/unlock inside
tdb_traverse: The transaction code holds the global lock at offset
TRANSACTION_LOCK. The call to tdb_transaction_lock does nothing because the
transaction_lock is already being held. tdb_transaction_unlock inside tdb_wrap
resets tdb->have_transaction_lock but does not release the kernel-level fcntl
lock. transaction_commit later on does not release that fcntl lock either,
because tdb->have_transaction_lock was already reset by tdb_transaction().
This patch does fix that problem for me. An alternative would be to make
tdb->have_transaction_lock a counter that can cope with proper nesting, maybe
in other places as well.
Volker
(This used to be commit 80e700e3bd)
Mainly this is the svn changes :
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r23238 | tridge | 2007-05-30 01:15:49 -0700 (Wed, 30 May 2007) | 6 lines
merged transaction lock changes from ctdb
this ensures that having the global lock also implies the transaction
lock
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r22832 | tridge | 2007-05-13 18:00:06 -0700 (Sun, 13 May 2007) | 3 lines
merged the latest tdb changes from ctdb to Samba4
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit ab11c00557)
an alarm sig would not terminate and could lead
to runaway smbd processes.
Thanks to Dave Daugherty @ Centrify for pointing
this out to us.
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit ef8da16983)
error condition to write. This is in tdb_new_database.
Fix one call to tdb_new_database in tdb_open_ex to not
overwrite the newly propagated errno (typically ENOSPC).
Michael
(This used to be commit 24fed55d72)
* prevent infinite loops due to 0 bytes written:
try once more. if we still get 0 as return,
set errno to ENOSPC and return -1 (error)
* replace int by correct types (ssize_t and size_t).
* print a warning log message in case "written < requested to write"
usually this means, that the next call to pwrite will fail
with return value -1 and set errno accordingly.
Note that the former error condition "written != requested to write"
is not a correct error condition of write/pwrite. If this is due
to an error, a subsequent call to (p)write will reveal the cause
(typically "no space left on device" - ENOSPC).
Michael
(This used to be commit 5b8d53dfe1)
travlocks.lock_rw for lock read/write types, it
was sometimes using it (tdb_next_lock) and
sometimes explicitly using F_WRLCK instead.
Change this to consistently use travlocks.lock_rw
only.
I'm pretty sure about this fix (else I woudn't
be checking this in :-) but tridge and Volker
please review.
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit d0b6456763)
