IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglasbagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Autobuild-User(master): Garming Sam <garming@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Sep 1 09:38:47 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
This requires a significant rework, as we can no longer
do a one-level search and hope to find most of the deleted
objects. Therefore we fall back to a full scan, but less often.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
This will allow it to be specified by the caller when we add python bindings
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
This is so that in a future commit, we can wrap this in python and allow it to be called
from outside the samba server processs.
This requires that we rework the callers and internals to avoid reference to
private data structures of the KCC service.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
This is in preperation for a python binding for this function
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
These test a variety of simple AD DC operations.
These tests are NOT independent of each other and must be run in the
right order (alphabetically, which is guaranteed by Python's unittest
module) -- the running of each test is part of the set-up for later
modules. This means we have to subvert unittest a bit, but it saves
hours of repeated set-up.
These tests are not intended to push edge cases, but to hammer common
operations that should work on all versions of Samba. The tests have
been tested back to Samba 4.0.26.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
dbcheck of the rid pool (CN=RID Set) for another server will otherwise fail because
rIDNextRid is not replicated, and so it not present
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12178
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
We already do that for objects in dsdb_convert_object_ex().
We need to be consistent and do the same for linked attributes.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12128
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
dsdb_create_prefix_mapping() should be the only place that calls
dsdb_schema_pfm_make_attid().
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12128
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
We may not have a prefix mapping for the new attribute definition,
it will be added later.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12128
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
We should create the working_schema prefix map before we try to
resolve the schema. This allows getting the same mapping (if there's not already
a conflict) and allows us to remove the implicit prefix mapping creation
in the prefix mapping lookup functions.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12128
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
We allow a hint for the id from the remote prefix map.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12128
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This avoids confusion when reading the talloc dump from a ldb context that has
been the target of replication, as the dsdb_schema_copy_shallow() memory was
still around, if unused.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12115
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This attempts to make it clear what memory is short term and what memory is long term
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12115
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
It's perfectly valid to replicate from a partner with an older schema
version, otherwise schema changes would block any other replication
until every dc in the forest has the schema changes.
The avoids an endless loop trying to get schema in sync with the partner.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12115
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This will simplify the schema checking in future.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12115
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Otherwise dreplsrv_op_pull_source_get_changes_trigger() could infinitely recurse.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Aug 6 01:24:05 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
There were no users of the data, and it added additional complexity
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We should propagate resolved conflicts immediately.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Jul 23 03:18:58 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
The caller needs to know about them in order to decide about possible
notifications.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
When UF_SMARTCARD_REQUIRED is set to an account we need to remove
the current password and add random NT and LM hashes (without updating
the pwdLastSet field.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11441
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Bokovoy <ab@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Jul 22 19:51:09 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
It's important that Primary:SambaGPG is added as the last element.
This is the indication that it matches the current password.
When a password change happens on a Windows DC,
it will keep the old Primary:SambaGPG value, but as the first element.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Bokovoy <ab@samba.org>
This will be used to store the cleartext utf16 password
GPG encrypted as 'Primary:SambaGPG' in the
supplementalCredentials attribute.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Bokovoy <ab@samba.org>
