IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
we must always restart the lockmanager when the cluster has been
reconfigured and ip addresses has changed. This is to make sure we get a
clusterwide grace period for nfs locking.
if we dont do this and only restart locking on the nodes that were
direclty affected, a different client can take out a conflicting lock
from a different node before affected clients has had a chance to
reclaim all the locks lost during reconfigure.
grace period on rhel5 kernel has bene increased to 90 seconds!
statd-callout:
we must restart lockmanager to ensure a clusterwide grace period for
nfs. this makes locking "more correct" for nfs clients and prevents
other clients/nodes from taking out a conflicting lock while a different
client/node tries to reclaim lost locks.
This makes it "almost consistent" for NFS clients but there is still
the possibility that a cifs client can take out a conflicting lock
before an nfs client has had a chance to reclaim an existing lock.
This can not be solved with anything less than making the kernel nfs
lock manager "samba aware" and making samba aware of the internal state
of the kernel lock manager so that they can cooperate.
we can not just stop/start the lockmanager back to back in rhel5 since
if they are stopped/started too close to eachother then when the new
lockmanager upon starting up sends out statd notifications two things
can happen:
1, new lockmanager sends out notification BEFORE it has registered with
portmapper leading to
lockmanager starts
lockmanager sends notification to the client
client tries to recover the lock and tries to portmap the lockmanager
port on the server.
server is not (yet) registered with portmapper and server responds
"no such program" to hte clients request to discover where lockmanager
is.
client then just completely gives up reclaiming the lock and doesnt
even reattempt the portmapper call after some timeout.
==> lock reclaim failed.
2, if they are started back to back, and a client tries to reclaim the
lock the lockmanager sometimes sends two responses back to back
to the client. one with status NLM_GRANTED (==you got the lock
reclaimed) and one with status NLM_DENIED (==you could not get the lock
reclaimed)
This confuses the client and leads to the server thinking that the
client does have the lock and the client thinking it has not got the
lock and orphaned locks result.
We also send out additional notification messages of different formats
to allow more legacy clients to interoperate with locking.
(This used to be ctdb commit 13208c1aab2942e28dff87e38e6794bf0c026033)
overkill since
1, we now kill the tcpconnections for lockd in 60.nfs
2, rpc.statd on linux sends out the notifications using the wrong
interface anyway which breaks a lot of clients including linux !
use our own smnotify tool instead of sm-notify
(This used to be ctdb commit 0163ad0ec01be6189a98ea91e5cec40f6750218f)
