IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Creating a user is CPU intensive, particularly when a password is set
so avoid doing so if not required.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Previously, if either of the rIDPreviousAllocation and rIDNextRID
attributes were not present in a RID Set, the first RID in
rIDAllocationPool was skipped over when determining their values.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14669
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
TestCase.assertEquals() is an alias for TestCase.assertEqual() and
has been deprecated since Python 2.7.
When we run our tests with in python developer mode (`PYTHONDEVMODE=1
make test`) we get 580 DeprecationWarnings about this.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Noel Power <npower@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
We should add some other more complex operations here.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13448
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
[MS-ADTS] 3.1.1.5.2.3 Special Classes and Attributes claims:
FPO-enabled attributes:
member, msDS-MembersForAzRole, msDS-NeverRevealGroup,
msDS-NonMembers, msDS-RevealOnDemandGroup, msDS-ServiceAccount.
'msDS-NonMembers' always generates NOT_SUPPORTED.
'msDS-ServiceAccount' is not defined in any schema
(only msDS-HostServiceAccount).
'msDS-HostServiceAccount' is not an FPO-enabled attribute
and behaves as the 'manager' attribute.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13300
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Dec 13 08:47:05 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
The check for the final digit in the SID was wrong, any domain SID
ending with a zero would fail the test.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
It is possible for foreign security principals to have duplicate object
sids, this can be the result of:
a replication race condition generating conflict resolution objects
or the foreign security principal being deleted and then re-added on a
join.
Rather than remove unique check on all objectSIDs we wish to allow
duplicate objectSIDs for foreign security principals. But enforce the
unique constraint for local objects.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13004
Signed-off-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
This avoids running the test while samba is modifying and locking the same database,
as this can lead to a deadlock.
The deadlock is not seen in production as the LDB read lock is not held while
waiting for another process, but this test needs to do this to demonstrate
the locking safety.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Dec 8 21:47:55 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
We should never taint the Administrator account as we don't shut down
target envionments!
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Nov 25 14:13:24 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
If we do not call ldb_module_done() then we do not know that up_req->callback()
has been called, and ldb_next_request() will call the callback again.
If called twice, the new ldb_lock_backend_callback() in ldb 1.2.0 will segfault.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12904
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Aug 1 07:52:38 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
This shows that locks are made on this file as well
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
These extended tests allow us to show that a search (read) blocks a
transaction commit (write), and that a transaction commit blocks a
search.
Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Pair-programmed-with: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Pair-programmed-with: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Load the test environment specific parameters
Signed-off-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Apr 6 10:06:05 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
Unknown attributeID values would cause an exception previously, and
unsorted attributes cause a failure to replicate with Samba 4.2.
In commit 61b978872f we started
to sort these values correctly, but previous versions of Samba
did not sort them correctly (we sorted high-bit-set values as
negative), and then after 9c9df40220
we stoped accepting these.
To ensure we are allowed to make this unusual change to the
replPropertyMetaData, a new OID is allocated and checked
for in repl_meta_data.c
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10973
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Mar 2 03:57:34 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
