IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Apr 10 06:15:46 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
(cherry picked from commit 60df2a09a4)
Here NTLM is disabled, so failure is intended.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Where NETLOGON is disabled, the failure is intended.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
From the file itself:
> # The fl2000dc environment is provisioned with the --plaintext-secrets option
> # running the ecnrypted secrets tests on it and expecting them to fail.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
These tests have been set up to fail by smb.conf options, partly
in order to test those options.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
These tests are expected to fail because the handling of GET_ANC has
deliberately been degraded in this environment (in order to test an
upgrade path, long story).
> We now show this is in effect by the fact that tests now fail.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
To quote the original commit:
> Note that the rpc.echo tests for the testallowed and testdenied users
> fail, because we don't backup the secrets for these users. So these
> tests failing proves that the lab-DC testenv is correct.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We have some tests that are not only known to fail, but which are
intended to fail.
For example, to quote selftest/knownfail.d/dns:
> # These tests are expected to fail because we want to ensure that
> # unauthenticated updates are not permitted against the default
> # configuration, nor against an RODC
In contrast to selftest/knownfail.d/uac_objectclass_restrict, which
says:
> # All these tests need to be fixed and the entries here removed
That one should stay in selftest/knownfail.d.
Some files are mixed. For example, there are lines in
selftest/knownfail.d/smb1-tests which were added in *commits* that say
> We also need to add a knownfail (which will not be removed) for the
> new test which will fail in smb1 envs
but it is not clear to me that the whole file is expected to always
fail.
By moving some knownfails here, we allow selftest/knownfail.d to be a
bit more like a TODO list, containing things that actually constitute
failure.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
