IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Currently the only backend which works is smbpasswd (tdb, LDAP, and NIS+)
are broken, but they were somewhat broken before. :)
The following functions implement the storage manipulation interface
/*The following definitions come from passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c */
BOOL pdb_setsampwent (BOOL update);
void pdb_endsampwent (void);
SAM_ACCOUNT* pdb_getsampwent (void);
SAM_ACCOUNT* pdb_getsampwnam (char *username);
SAM_ACCOUNT* pdb_getsampwuid (uid_t uid);
SAM_ACCOUNT* pdb_getsampwrid (uint32 rid);
BOOL pdb_add_sam_account (SAM_ACCOUNT *sampass);
BOOL pdb_update_sam_account (SAM_ACCOUNT *sampass, BOOL override);
BOOL pdb_delete_sam_account (char* username);
There is also a host of pdb_set..() and pdb_get..() functions for
manipulating SAM_ACCOUNT struct members. Note that the struct
passdb_ops {} has gone away. Also notice that struct smb_passwd
(formally in smb.h) has been moved to passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c
and is not accessed outisde of static internal functions in this
file. All local password searches should make use of the the SAM_ACCOUNT
struct and the previously mentioned functions.
I'll write some documentation for this later. The next step is to fix
the TDB passdb backend, then work on spliting the backends out into
share libraries, and finally get the LDAP backend going.
What works and may not:
o domain logons from Win9x works
o domain logons from WinNT 4 works
o user and group enumeration
as implemented by Tim works
o file and print access works
o changing password from
Win9x & NT ummm...i'll fix this tonight :)
If I broke anything else, just yell and I'll fix it. I think it
should be fairly quite.
-- jerry
And we create the disabled account. That means we can create user and
trust accounts remotely !
ifdef out a return in passdb/smbpass.c. I think I didn't break any
security. Jeremy could you check if I didn't make any mistakes ???
J.F.
libsmb/clientgen.c: Fixes for Win2k smbclient browsing.
Other fixes implement smbpasswd -x user to delete users. Also allows swat
to do the same.
Jeremy.
weird unixware stuff) into _Get_Pwnam() to fix a memory allocation bug.
Note that the Get_Pwnam() function now returns a const struct passwd *
as a hint to other developers not to change entries in the struct
passwd.
of a private/smbpasswd file, this will not be the case for other
database APIs. removed startsmbdb and endsmbpwdb calls because
add_smbpwd_entry() and mod_smbpwd_entry() don't need them.
- split sam_passwd and smb_passwd into separate higher-order function tables
- renamed struct smb_passwd's "smb_user" to "unix_user". added "nt_user"
plus user_rid, and added a "wrap" function in both sam_passwd and smb_passwd
password databases to fill in the blank entries that are not obtained
from whatever password database API instance is being used.
NOTE: whenever a struct smb_passwd or struct sam_passwd is used, it MUST
be initialised with pwdb_sam_init() or pwd_smb_init(), see chgpasswd.c
for the only example outside of the password database APIs i could find.
- added query_useraliases code to rpcclient.
- dealt with some nasty interdependencies involving non-smbd programs
and the password database API. this is still not satisfactorily
resolved completelely, but it's the best i can do for now.
- #ifdef'd out some password database options so that people don't
mistakenly set them unless they recompile to _use_ those options.
lots of debugging done, it's still not finished. the unix/NT uid/gid
and user-rid/group-rid issues are better, but not perfect. the "BUILTIN"
domain is still missing: users cannot be added to "BUILTIN" groups yet,
as we only have an "alias" db API and a "group" db API but not "builtin-alias"
db API...
Tidied up some of the mess (no other word for it). Still doesn't
compile cleanly. There are calls with incorrect parameters that
don't seem to be doing the right thing.
This code still needs surgery :-(.
Jeremy.
