IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This uses ndr_pack/unpack in order to create a deep copy
of the given object.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
(cherry picked from commit 4627997ddae44265ad35b3234232eb74458c6c34)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
(cherry picked from commit 9ea06aaf9f57e3c7094553d9ac40fb73057a9b74)
They better represent what they are doing, we keep dacl_add_ace()
as wrapper of dacl_prepend_aces() in order to let existing callers
work as before.
In future it would be good to have a dacl_insert_aces() that
would canonicalize the ace order before storing, but that a task
for another day.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
(cherry picked from commit a1109a9bf12e020636b8d66fc54984aac58bfe6b)
This is a more generic api that can be re-used in other places
as well in future. It operates on a security descriptor object instead of
SDDL.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
(cherry picked from commit 8411e6d302e25d10f1035ebbdcbde7308566e930)
It's no longer used anywhere.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 8b4e6f7b3fb8018cb64deef9b8e1cbc2e5ba12cf)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
(cherry picked from commit b29793ffdee5d9b9c1c05830622e80f7faec7670)
Use more specific unittest methods, and remove unused code.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 2e5d08c908b3fa48b9b374279a331061cb77bce3)
The confidential_attrs test no longer uses DC_MODE_RETURN_NONE we can now
remove the complexity.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
(cherry picked from commit 82d2ec786f7e75ff6f34eb3357964345b10de091)
If the client requested FILE_OVERWRITE[_IF], we're implicitly adding
FILE_WRITE_DATA to the open_access_mask in open_file_ntcreate(), but for the
access check we're using access_mask which doesn't contain the additional
right, which means we can end up truncating a file for which the user has
only read-only access via an SD.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15439
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
We correctly handle this and just return ENOENT (NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND).
Remove knowfail.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15422
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
The raw SMB2-INVALID-PIPENAME test passes against Windows 2022,
as it just returns NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND.
Add the knownfail.
BUG:https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15422
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
For now, SMB_ASSERT() to exit the server. We will remove
this once the test code is in place.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15422
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
We now have ensured that no conflicting services attempt to start
so we do not need the runtime lookup and so avoid the risk that
the lookup may fail.
This means that any duplicates will be noticed early not just
in a race condition.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15473
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Just as we refuse to start NETLOGON except on the DC, we must refuse
to start all of the RPC services that are provided by the AD DC.
Most critically of course this applies to netlogon, lsa and samr.
This avoids the supression of these services being the result of a
runtime epmapper lookup, as if that fails these services can disrupt
service to end users by listening on the same socket as the AD DC
servers.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15473
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
The rpcecho server in source3 does have samba the sleep() feature that
the s4 version has, but the task architecture is different, so there
is not the same impact. Hoever equally this is not something that
should be enabled on production builds of Samba, so restrict to
selftest builds.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15474
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
The rpcecho server is useful in development and testing, but should never
have been allowed into production, as it includes the facility to
do a blocking sleep() in the single-threaded rpc worker.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15474
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This makes LDAP_DIRSYNC_OBJECT_SECURITY the only behaviour provided by
Samba.
Having a second access control system withing the LDAP stack is unsafe
and this layer is incomplete.
The current system gives all accounts that have been given the
GUID_DRS_GET_CHANGES extended right SYSTEM access. Currently in Samba
this equates to full access to passwords as well as "RODC Filtered
attributes" (often used with confidential attributes).
Rather than attempting to correctly filter for secrets (passwords) and
these filtered attributes, as well as preventing search expressions for
both, we leave this complexity to the acl_read module which has this
facility already well tested.
The implication is that callers will only see and filter by attribute
in DirSync that they could without DirSync.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
The aim here is to document the expected (even if not implemented)
SEARCH_FLAG_RODC_ATTRIBUTE vs SEARCH_FLAG_CONFIDENTIAL, behaviour, so
that any change once CVE-2023-4154 is fixed can be noted.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
SEARCH_FLAG_RODC_ATTRIBUTE should be like SEARCH_FLAG_CONFIDENTIAL,
but for DirSync and DRS replication. Accounts with
GUID_DRS_GET_CHANGES rights should not be able to read this
attribute.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
When we (expect to) get back a result, do not waste time against a potentially
slow server confirming we also get back results for all the other attribute
combinations.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Rather than fail, if the last run failed to reset things, just force
the DC into the required state.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
To re-use setup code, the super-class must have no test_*() methods
otherwise these will be run as well as the class-local tests.
We rename tests that would otherwise have duplicate names
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
(cherry picked from commit 2c02378029fff6636b8f19e45af78b265f2210ed)
Often it is important to insert an ace at a specific position in the
ACL. As a default we still append by default by using -1, which is the
generic version of passing the number of existing aces.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
(cherry picked from commit c3cb915a67aff6739b72b86d7d139609df309ada)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
(cherry picked from commit 9d8ff0d1e0b2ba7c84af36e1931f5bc99902a44b)
This uses ndr_pack/unpack in order to create a deep copy
of the given object.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
(cherry picked from commit 4627997ddae44265ad35b3234232eb74458c6c34)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
(cherry picked from commit 9ea06aaf9f57e3c7094553d9ac40fb73057a9b74)
They better represent what they are doing, we keep dacl_add_ace()
as wrapper of dacl_prepend_aces() in order to let existing callers
work as before.
In future it would be good to have a dacl_insert_aces() that
would canonicalize the ace order before storing, but that a task
for another day.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
(cherry picked from commit a1109a9bf12e020636b8d66fc54984aac58bfe6b)
This is a more generic api that can be re-used in other places
as well in future. It operates on a security descriptor object instead of
SDDL.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
(cherry picked from commit 8411e6d302e25d10f1035ebbdcbde7308566e930)
It's no longer used anywhere.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 8b4e6f7b3fb8018cb64deef9b8e1cbc2e5ba12cf)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
(cherry picked from commit b29793ffdee5d9b9c1c05830622e80f7faec7670)
Use more specific unittest methods, and remove unused code.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 2e5d08c908b3fa48b9b374279a331061cb77bce3)
The confidential_attrs test no longer uses DC_MODE_RETURN_NONE we can now
remove the complexity.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
(cherry picked from commit 82d2ec786f7e75ff6f34eb3357964345b10de091)
If the client requested FILE_OVERWRITE[_IF], we're implicitly adding
FILE_WRITE_DATA to the open_access_mask in open_file_ntcreate(), but for the
access check we're using access_mask which doesn't contain the additional
right, which means we can end up truncating a file for which the user has
only read-only access via an SD.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15439
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
We correctly handle this and just return ENOENT (NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND).
Remove knowfail.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15422
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
The raw SMB2-INVALID-PIPENAME test passes against Windows 2022,
as it just returns NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND.
Add the knownfail.
BUG:https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15422
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
For now, SMB_ASSERT() to exit the server. We will remove
this once the test code is in place.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15422
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
I’m not sure exactly how this check was supposed to work. But in any
case, within fast_unwrap_request() the Heimdal KDC replaces the outer
padata with the padata from the inner FAST request. Hence, this check
does not accomplish anything useful: at no point should the KDC plugin
see the outer padata.
A couple of unwanted consequences resulted from this check. One was that
a client who sent empty FX‐FAST padata within the inner FAST request
would receive the *Authentication Authority* Asserted Identity SID
instead of the *Service* Asserted Identity SID. Another consequence was
that a client could in the same manner bypass the restriction on
performing S4U2Self with an RODC‐issued TGT.
Overall, samba_wdc_is_s4u2self_req() is somewhat of a hack. But the
Heimdal plugin API gives us nothing better to work with.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 5c580dbdb3e6a70c8d2f5059e2b7293a7e780414)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15477
krb5_pac_add_buffer() makes its own copy of the data we pass in. We
don't need to make yet another copy.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit fa901e7346d36ae64a7ceab5dcf76bc210a67c93)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15476
Heimdal contains an assertion that the data pointer is not NULL. We need
to pass in a pointer to some dummy data instead.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 47ef49fd91f050ce4a79a8471b3e66c808f48752)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15476
