IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
These will be removed anyway and any change on them risks to
be an originating update that causes replication problems.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13816
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Mar 14 03:12:27 UTC 2019 on sn-devel-144
(cherry picked from commit a2c5f8cf41c2dfdc4f122e8427d1dfeabb6ba311)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13816
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit b096a3117ed9249fd6f65f3221a26c88efbba3b8)
These tests operate on provision dumps created long ago, they still
want to run tests on deleted objects, when the next commits remove
processing expired tombstone objects in dbcheck.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13816
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 5fccc4e9044d2e57be33471f5e6b9be7cc37ac3a)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13816
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 1ccc21a34d295be3bb2ab481a5918003eae88bf4)
When a parent object is removed during the tombstone garbage collection
before a child object and samba-tool dbcheck runs at the same time, the
following can happen:
- If the object child had DISALLOW_MOVE_ON_DELETE in systemFlags,
samba-tool dbcheck moves the object under the LostAndFound[Config]
object (as an originating update!)
- The lastKnownParent attribute is removed (as an originating update!)
These originating updates cause the object to have an extended time
as tombstone. And these changes are replicated to other DCs,
which very likely already removed the object completely!
This means the destination DC of replication has no chance to handle
the object it gets from the source DC with just 2 attributes (name, lastKnownParent).
The destination logs something like:
No objectClass found in replPropertyMetaData
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13816
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 5357f591accffbf8c62335c308b985811b66f0b5)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13571
Signed-off-by: Isaac Boukris <iboukris@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
By fixing bindir variable name.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13571
Signed-off-by: Isaac Boukris <iboukris@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13418
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Oct 30 10:32:51 CET 2018 on sn-devel-144
(cherry picked from commit 852e1db12b0afa04a738c03bb2609c084fe96a7f)
Autobuild-User(v4-8-test): Karolin Seeger <kseeger@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(v4-8-test): Mon Nov 5 14:28:49 CET 2018 on sn-devel-144
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13418
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit f81771c8593327e058b9cb4330d7e77083df3ea9)
This demonstrates the bug, that happens when the primaryGroupID
of a user is changed.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13418
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 364ed537e0bcb3a97cae0f2d1ff72de9423ce0e6)
dbcheck would fail to fix up attributes where the extended DN's GUID is
correct, but the DN itself is incorrect. The code failed attempting to
remove the old/incorrect DN, e.g.
NOTE: old (due to rename or delete) DN string component for
objectCategory in object CN=alice,CN=Users,DC=samba,DC=example,DC=com -
<GUID=7bfdf9d8-62f9-420c-8a71-e3d3e931c91e>;
CN=Person,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=samba,DC=bad,DC=com
Change DN to <GUID=7bfdf9d8-62f9-420c-8a71-e3d3e931c91e>;
CN=Person,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=samba,DC=example,DC=com?
[y/N/all/none] y
Failed to fix old DN string on attribute objectCategory : (16,
"attribute 'objectCategory': no matching attribute value while deleting
attribute on 'CN=alice,CN=Users,DC=samba,DC=example,DC=com'")
The problem was the LDB message specified the value to delete with its
full DN, including the GUID. The LDB code then helpfully corrected this
value on the way through, so that the DN got updated to reflect the
correct DN (i.e. 'DC=example,DC=com') of the object matching that GUID,
rather than the incorrect DN (i.e. 'DC=bad,DC=com') that we were trying
to remove. Because the requested value and the existing DB value didn't
match, the operation failed.
We can avoid this problem by passing down just the DN (not the extended
DN) of the value we want to delete. Without the GUID portion of the DN,
the LDB code will no longer try to correct it on the way through, and
the dbcheck operation will succeed.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13495
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Pair-programmed-with: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 22208f52e6096fbe9413b8ff339d9446851e0874)
This is needed otherwise pdbedit fails to initialize messaging in
autobuild.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13465
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 10e1a6ebb3d95b8a1584a9b90c2584536aa9c96d)
This demonstrates the bug we currently have.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13539
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 1b31fa62567ec549e32c9177b322cfbfb3b6ec1a)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13539
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 8526feb100e59bc5a15ceb940e6cecce0de59247)
To test it, add a blackbox test that ensures we pass a keytab-based
authentication with the trust user account for a trusted domain.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13539
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Bokovoy <ab@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 7df505298f71432d5adbcffccde8f97c117a57a6)
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13286
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 475a761637bbcc93edbe8d83fc13037e1087941a)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13228
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 52bd0b09804621e6de9ee0a377a442a42e07ee05)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13228
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit c34c2dd55545b99fba46cf374a1653bad96cea9e)
This fixes us to have the official adminDescription etc. While both schema were provided by
Microsoft this is a better quality one, but still under the same licence.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
This number had been mistakenly updated alongside the standard forest
updates revision. This version number appears to be independent of the
other revision levels.
Also add the change to a new .ldf file, which can be used to apply
the schema change to an existing Samba 4.7 (or earlier) instance.
Update the provision/upgrade test to do just this (otherwise it
complains about differences between a new provision and an older Samba
4.0.0 instance).
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This tests that we can provision using both the 2008 and 2012 schema,
that we can upgrade a 2008 Samba instance to use the 2012 schema, and
that when we do that the result (more or less) matches a straight
2012 provision.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This tool (and the corresponding test) is designed to migrate a Samba DC
from a pre-4.0.0 release up to a more recent schema (i.e. Windows 2008R2).
Going further than 2008R2 turns this test into a bit of a nightmare. We
now have a better adprep/'samba-tool domain schemaupgrade' option for
upgrading from 2008R2 to a more recent schema.
It seems to make most sense to leave this tests just running against
2008R2 schema provisions and add new tests to migrate from 2008R2 to
2012R2.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
The recent schema changes mean that the upgradeprovision test starts
failing. This is because it's using an old 4.0.0 schema (that doesn't
have these schema changes), but it's comparing it against a fresh
provision (which does have the changes). We can avoid this failure by
using the 'samba-tool domain schemaupgrade' to bring the old 4.0.0 schema
in line with a fresh provision. Note that the 'upgradeprovision --full'
test doesn't need this change as it seems to more aggressively copy over
any schema differences with a fresh provision.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Add the changes needed to provision a 2012 DC (mostly this just affects
the Extended Rights objects) by moving to the new extended-rights.ldif
The localizationDisplayId is not documented in MS-ATDS so these values
are moved to provision_configuation_modify.ldif and applied after the
display-specifiers.ldif
We don't enable the 2012R2 mode yet. The ${INC2012} variable
just gets replaced with '#' so the lines get commented out and not
applied.
This approach allows us to support provisioning both a 2008R2 DC or
a 2012R2 DC (so that we can test we can upgrade a 2008 DC to 2012).
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Nov 30 01:47:24 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
Test that correct keytab is picked up.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13166
Signed-off-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
These tests now confirm we can handle these issues at runtime
as well as at dbcheck
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13095
Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This will allow us to test other run-time behaviour with broken
databases.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This validates some more combinations and ensures that the changes
in 962a1b32201fce0a49c6be55943d4fbb57ed781e are tested.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This has been fixed with b81ca4f9dcbb378a95fb3ac31bfd9a1cbe505d7d
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Oct 27 15:22:43 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
The GUID index code will change the returned results order
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Modifying the backend DB is not a supported operation, but helps us create test
situations.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Previously Samba would just drop cross-partition links where the link
target object is unknown. Instead, what we want to do is try to add the
forward link for the GUID specified. We can't add the backlink because
we don't know the target, however, dbcheck should be able to fix any
missing backlinks.
The new behaviour should now mean dbcheck will detect the problem and be
able to fix it. It's still not ideal, but it's better than dropping the
link completely.
I've updated the log so that it has higher severity and tells the user
what they need to do to fix it.
These changes now mean that the selftests now detect an error - instead
of completely dropping the serverReference, we now have a missing
backlink. I've updated the selftests to fix up any missing
serverReference backlinks before running dbcheck.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12972
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Aug 17 00:53:48 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
BUG: BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12956
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Aug 11 22:09:27 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
Long story: This was triggered by the addition of the test_trust_ntlm.sh
script in commits 3caca9b and 2de1994. test_trust_ntlm.sh creates a
variable CREDS="$REALM\\$USERNAME%$PASSWORD" that is then used as part
of the test name. subunit.sh uses echo to print the name that is then
picked up by subunithelper.py. test_trust_ntlm.sh also uses /bin/sh as
shell which can be a POSIX compliant shell like dash.
This combination broke 'make test' for any username starting with the
letter c. In this case CREDS contains the escape sequence \c that is
defined to stop producing further output at this point. dash implements
this feature and the echo in subunit.sh as a result skips the output
after \c, including skipping the newline. This means that the data
received by subunithelper.py contains the timestamp from the next line
in the test name, which then breaks the testcase tracking.
Fix this by replacing the echo in subunit.sh with a printf that does not
trigger the special handling of escape characters.
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri May 5 23:44:16 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144