mirror of
https://github.com/samba-team/samba.git
synced 2025-01-07 17:18:11 +03:00
5f93ac1f6f
Added a test to simulate a user accidentally being deleted and 2 different admins trying to resolve the problem simultaneously - one by re-animating the object and one by just creating a new object with the same name. Currently this test fails on Samba because it chooses the higher version number as the winner instead of the latest change. BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13039 Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz> Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
11 lines
998 B
Plaintext
11 lines
998 B
Plaintext
# Samba currently picks a different winner of object conflicts compared to Windows.
|
|
# Samba uses the version number whereas Windows always takes the most recent change
|
|
samba4.drs.replica_sync.python\(vampire_dc\).replica_sync.DrsReplicaSyncTestCase.test_ReplConflictsRenamedVsNewRemoteWin\(vampire_dc:local\)
|
|
samba4.drs.replica_sync.python\(promoted_dc\).replica_sync.DrsReplicaSyncTestCase.test_ReplConflictsRenamedVsNewRemoteWin\(promoted_dc:local\)
|
|
samba4.drs.replica_sync.python\(vampire_dc\).replica_sync.DrsReplicaSyncTestCase.test_ReplConflictsRenamedVsNewLocalWin\(vampire_dc:local\)
|
|
samba4.drs.replica_sync.python\(promoted_dc\).replica_sync.DrsReplicaSyncTestCase.test_ReplConflictsRenamedVsNewLocalWin\(promoted_dc:local\)
|
|
samba4.drs.replica_sync.python\(vampire_dc\).replica_sync.DrsReplicaSyncTestCase.test_ReplReanimationConflict\(vampire_dc:local\)
|
|
samba4.drs.replica_sync.python\(promoted_dc\).replica_sync.DrsReplicaSyncTestCase.test_ReplReanimationConflict\(promoted_dc:local\)
|
|
|
|
|