1
0
mirror of https://github.com/samba-team/samba.git synced 2024-12-23 17:34:34 +03:00
samba-mirror/source3/tdb/traverse.c
Volker Lendecke 4d6d92400c r17460: First step at fixing the build breakage with the groupmapping test. On Linux,
F_RDLCK is defined to 0, for example NetBSD has it at 1.

Still does not work fully though. Still investigating.

This might also be interesting to Samba4.

Volker
(This used to be commit a1c3774e01)
2007-10-10 11:38:35 -05:00

336 lines
10 KiB
C

/*
Unix SMB/CIFS implementation.
trivial database library
Copyright (C) Andrew Tridgell 1999-2005
Copyright (C) Paul `Rusty' Russell 2000
Copyright (C) Jeremy Allison 2000-2003
** NOTE! The following LGPL license applies to the tdb
** library. This does NOT imply that all of Samba is released
** under the LGPL
This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
Lesser General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
*/
#include "tdb_private.h"
/* Uses traverse lock: 0 = finish, -1 = error, other = record offset */
static int tdb_next_lock(struct tdb_context *tdb, struct tdb_traverse_lock *tlock,
struct list_struct *rec)
{
int want_next = (tlock->off != 0);
/* Lock each chain from the start one. */
for (; tlock->hash < tdb->header.hash_size; tlock->hash++) {
if (!tlock->off && tlock->hash != 0) {
/* this is an optimisation for the common case where
the hash chain is empty, which is particularly
common for the use of tdb with ldb, where large
hashes are used. In that case we spend most of our
time in tdb_brlock(), locking empty hash chains.
To avoid this, we do an unlocked pre-check to see
if the hash chain is empty before starting to look
inside it. If it is empty then we can avoid that
hash chain. If it isn't empty then we can't believe
the value we get back, as we read it without a
lock, so instead we get the lock and re-fetch the
value below.
Notice that not doing this optimisation on the
first hash chain is critical. We must guarantee
that we have done at least one fcntl lock at the
start of a search to guarantee that memory is
coherent on SMP systems. If records are added by
others during the search then thats OK, and we
could possibly miss those with this trick, but we
could miss them anyway without this trick, so the
semantics don't change.
With a non-indexed ldb search this trick gains us a
factor of around 80 in speed on a linux 2.6.x
system (testing using ldbtest).
*/
tdb->methods->next_hash_chain(tdb, &tlock->hash);
if (tlock->hash == tdb->header.hash_size) {
continue;
}
}
if (tdb_lock(tdb, tlock->hash, tlock->lock_rw) == -1)
return -1;
/* No previous record? Start at top of chain. */
if (!tlock->off) {
if (tdb_ofs_read(tdb, TDB_HASH_TOP(tlock->hash),
&tlock->off) == -1)
goto fail;
} else {
/* Otherwise unlock the previous record. */
if (tdb_unlock_record(tdb, tlock->off) != 0)
goto fail;
}
if (want_next) {
/* We have offset of old record: grab next */
if (tdb_rec_read(tdb, tlock->off, rec) == -1)
goto fail;
tlock->off = rec->next;
}
/* Iterate through chain */
while( tlock->off) {
tdb_off_t current;
if (tdb_rec_read(tdb, tlock->off, rec) == -1)
goto fail;
/* Detect infinite loops. From "Shlomi Yaakobovich" <Shlomi@exanet.com>. */
if (tlock->off == rec->next) {
TDB_LOG((tdb, 0, "tdb_next_lock: loop detected.\n"));
goto fail;
}
if (!TDB_DEAD(rec)) {
/* Woohoo: we found one! */
if (tdb_lock_record(tdb, tlock->off) != 0)
goto fail;
return tlock->off;
}
/* Try to clean dead ones from old traverses */
current = tlock->off;
tlock->off = rec->next;
if (!(tdb->read_only || tdb->traverse_read) &&
tdb_do_delete(tdb, current, rec) != 0)
goto fail;
}
tdb_unlock(tdb, tlock->hash, tlock->lock_rw);
want_next = 0;
}
/* We finished iteration without finding anything */
return TDB_ERRCODE(TDB_SUCCESS, 0);
fail:
tlock->off = 0;
if (tdb_unlock(tdb, tlock->hash, tlock->lock_rw) != 0)
TDB_LOG((tdb, 0, "tdb_next_lock: On error unlock failed!\n"));
return -1;
}
/* traverse the entire database - calling fn(tdb, key, data) on each element.
return -1 on error or the record count traversed
if fn is NULL then it is not called
a non-zero return value from fn() indicates that the traversal should stop
*/
static int tdb_traverse_internal(struct tdb_context *tdb,
tdb_traverse_func fn, void *private_data,
struct tdb_traverse_lock *tl)
{
TDB_DATA key, dbuf;
struct list_struct rec;
int ret, count = 0;
/* This was in the initializaton, above, but the IRIX compiler
* did not like it. crh
*/
tl->next = tdb->travlocks.next;
/* fcntl locks don't stack: beware traverse inside traverse */
tdb->travlocks.next = tl;
/* tdb_next_lock places locks on the record returned, and its chain */
while ((ret = tdb_next_lock(tdb, tl, &rec)) > 0) {
count++;
/* now read the full record */
key.dptr = tdb_alloc_read(tdb, tl->off + sizeof(rec),
rec.key_len + rec.data_len);
if (!key.dptr) {
ret = -1;
if (tdb_unlock(tdb, tl->hash, tl->lock_rw) != 0)
goto out;
if (tdb_unlock_record(tdb, tl->off) != 0)
TDB_LOG((tdb, 0, "tdb_traverse: key.dptr == NULL and unlock_record failed!\n"));
goto out;
}
key.dsize = rec.key_len;
dbuf.dptr = key.dptr + rec.key_len;
dbuf.dsize = rec.data_len;
/* Drop chain lock, call out */
if (tdb_unlock(tdb, tl->hash, tl->lock_rw) != 0) {
ret = -1;
SAFE_FREE(key.dptr);
goto out;
}
if (fn && fn(tdb, key, dbuf, private_data)) {
/* They want us to terminate traversal */
ret = count;
if (tdb_unlock_record(tdb, tl->off) != 0) {
TDB_LOG((tdb, 0, "tdb_traverse: unlock_record failed!\n"));;
ret = -1;
}
SAFE_FREE(key.dptr);
goto out;
}
SAFE_FREE(key.dptr);
}
out:
tdb->travlocks.next = tl->next;
if (ret < 0)
return -1;
else
return count;
}
/*
a write style traverse - temporarily marks the db read only
*/
int tdb_traverse_read(struct tdb_context *tdb,
tdb_traverse_func fn, void *private_data)
{
struct tdb_traverse_lock tl = { NULL, 0, 0, F_RDLCK };
int ret;
/* we need to get a read lock on the transaction lock here to
cope with the lock ordering semantics of solaris10 */
if (tdb->methods->tdb_brlock(tdb, TRANSACTION_LOCK, F_RDLCK, F_SETLKW, 0) == -1) {
TDB_LOG((tdb, 0, "tdb_traverse_read: failed to get transaction lock\n"));
tdb->ecode = TDB_ERR_LOCK;
return -1;
}
tdb->traverse_read++;
ret = tdb_traverse_internal(tdb, fn, private_data, &tl);
tdb->traverse_read--;
tdb->methods->tdb_brlock(tdb, TRANSACTION_LOCK, F_UNLCK, F_SETLKW, 0);
return ret;
}
/*
a write style traverse - needs to get the transaction lock to
prevent deadlocks
*/
int tdb_traverse(struct tdb_context *tdb,
tdb_traverse_func fn, void *private_data)
{
struct tdb_traverse_lock tl = { NULL, 0, 0, F_WRLCK };
int ret;
if (tdb->read_only || tdb->traverse_read) {
return tdb_traverse_read(tdb, fn, private_data);
}
if (tdb->methods->tdb_brlock(tdb, TRANSACTION_LOCK, F_WRLCK, F_SETLKW, 0) == -1) {
TDB_LOG((tdb, 0, "tdb_traverse: failed to get transaction lock\n"));
tdb->ecode = TDB_ERR_LOCK;
return -1;
}
ret = tdb_traverse_internal(tdb, fn, private_data, &tl);
tdb->methods->tdb_brlock(tdb, TRANSACTION_LOCK, F_UNLCK, F_SETLKW, 0);
return ret;
}
/* find the first entry in the database and return its key */
TDB_DATA tdb_firstkey(struct tdb_context *tdb)
{
TDB_DATA key;
struct list_struct rec;
/* release any old lock */
if (tdb_unlock_record(tdb, tdb->travlocks.off) != 0)
return tdb_null;
tdb->travlocks.off = tdb->travlocks.hash = 0;
tdb->travlocks.lock_rw = F_RDLCK;
if (tdb_next_lock(tdb, &tdb->travlocks, &rec) <= 0)
return tdb_null;
/* now read the key */
key.dsize = rec.key_len;
key.dptr =tdb_alloc_read(tdb,tdb->travlocks.off+sizeof(rec),key.dsize);
if (tdb_unlock(tdb, BUCKET(tdb->travlocks.hash), F_WRLCK) != 0)
TDB_LOG((tdb, 0, "tdb_firstkey: error occurred while tdb_unlocking!\n"));
return key;
}
/* find the next entry in the database, returning its key */
TDB_DATA tdb_nextkey(struct tdb_context *tdb, TDB_DATA oldkey)
{
u32 oldhash;
TDB_DATA key = tdb_null;
struct list_struct rec;
char *k = NULL;
/* Is locked key the old key? If so, traverse will be reliable. */
if (tdb->travlocks.off) {
if (tdb_lock(tdb,tdb->travlocks.hash,F_WRLCK))
return tdb_null;
if (tdb_rec_read(tdb, tdb->travlocks.off, &rec) == -1
|| !(k = tdb_alloc_read(tdb,tdb->travlocks.off+sizeof(rec),
rec.key_len))
|| memcmp(k, oldkey.dptr, oldkey.dsize) != 0) {
/* No, it wasn't: unlock it and start from scratch */
if (tdb_unlock_record(tdb, tdb->travlocks.off) != 0) {
SAFE_FREE(k);
return tdb_null;
}
if (tdb_unlock(tdb, tdb->travlocks.hash, F_WRLCK) != 0) {
SAFE_FREE(k);
return tdb_null;
}
tdb->travlocks.off = 0;
}
SAFE_FREE(k);
}
if (!tdb->travlocks.off) {
/* No previous element: do normal find, and lock record */
tdb->travlocks.off = tdb_find_lock_hash(tdb, oldkey, tdb->hash_fn(&oldkey), F_WRLCK, &rec);
if (!tdb->travlocks.off)
return tdb_null;
tdb->travlocks.hash = BUCKET(rec.full_hash);
if (tdb_lock_record(tdb, tdb->travlocks.off) != 0) {
TDB_LOG((tdb, 0, "tdb_nextkey: lock_record failed (%s)!\n", strerror(errno)));
return tdb_null;
}
}
oldhash = tdb->travlocks.hash;
/* Grab next record: locks chain and returned record,
unlocks old record */
if (tdb_next_lock(tdb, &tdb->travlocks, &rec) > 0) {
key.dsize = rec.key_len;
key.dptr = tdb_alloc_read(tdb, tdb->travlocks.off+sizeof(rec),
key.dsize);
/* Unlock the chain of this new record */
if (tdb_unlock(tdb, tdb->travlocks.hash, F_WRLCK) != 0)
TDB_LOG((tdb, 0, "tdb_nextkey: WARNING tdb_unlock failed!\n"));
}
/* Unlock the chain of old record */
if (tdb_unlock(tdb, BUCKET(oldhash), F_WRLCK) != 0)
TDB_LOG((tdb, 0, "tdb_nextkey: WARNING tdb_unlock failed!\n"));
return key;
}