Rusty Russell 1ab8776247 tdb: remove num_locks ... This was redundant before this patch series: it mirrored num_lockrecs exactly. It still does. Also, skip useless branch when locks == 1: unconditional assignment is cheaper anyway. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>		2010-02-17 15:01:07 +10:30
..
check.c	tdb: give a name to the invalid recovery area constant (0)	2010-02-10 16:56:13 +10:30
dump.c	tdb: rename 'struct list_struct' into 'struct tdb_record'	2009-10-23 18:27:20 +02:00
error.c	Move common libraries from root to lib/.	2008-09-17 14:11:12 +02:00
freelist.c	Spelling fixes for tdb.	2010-02-22 21:45:31 +01:00
freelistcheck.c	tdb: rename 'struct list_struct' into 'struct tdb_record'	2009-10-23 18:27:20 +02:00
io.c	tdb: cleanup: split brlock and brunlock methods.	2010-02-17 12:17:19 +10:30
lock.c	tdb: remove num_locks	2010-02-17 15:01:07 +10:30
open.c	tdb: use tdb_nest_lock() for active lock.	2010-02-24 10:44:40 +10:30
tdb_private.h	tdb: remove num_locks	2010-02-17 15:01:07 +10:30
tdb.c	tdb: use tdb_nest_lock() for seqnum lock.	2010-02-17 12:40:57 +10:30
transaction.c	tdb: use tdb_nest_lock() for open lock.	2010-02-22 13:58:07 +10:30
traverse.c	tdb: cleanup: split brlock and brunlock methods.	2010-02-17 12:17:19 +10:30